Trump and Clinton Are Both After Our Liberties in Wake of Orlando Shooting


It is a natural reaction in the face of tragedy. We want something done. We want to feel safe. People, in every walk of life and no matter their political persuasion, want someone to ensure their protection.

So, in the wake of the Orlando Massacre, both presidential candidates have come out to speak to the things they think should be done to provide those safe feelings. But is either one of these solutions conducive to personal liberty?

The Washington Times reports:

Trending: Bombshell: Media Blackout As DOJ Announces Obama Accepted At Least $21.6 Million In Foreign Donations For 2012 Re-Election

“The Obama administration, with the support of Hillary Clinton and others, has also damaged our security by restraining our intelligence-gathering and failing to support law enforcement. They have put political correctness above common sense, above your safety and above all else,” Mr. Trump said. “I refuse to be politically correct.”

take our poll - story continues below

Do you support President Trump's plan to impose tariffs on Mexico?

  • Do you support President Trump's plan to impose tariffs on Mexico?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Now, to clarify, Trump wishes to surveil Mosques. Now, at first flash, this appears to be the right answer. But, the reason this is not unreasonable is that it is not a church or temple where you worship.

What happens if Christians are considered threats to the government? What if the Jew? Is this not the perfect precedent to watch their preaching and fellowships? But, Clinton’s solution is no better.

The Times continues:

Mrs. Clinton also took a more traditional approach during a campaign stop in Ohio by saying “today is not a day for politics” and “Americans woke up to a nightmare that’s become mind-numbingly familiar.”

The former top diplomat expressed optimism in the nation’s ability to come together in the aftermath to deal with threats and voiced her support for stricter gun control laws and beefing up online surveillance.

Again, is this the answer? Let us be frank: less liberty is never the answer. The answer to ending such acts is to make people accountable to govern themselves. Speeches like these cause me to wonder if these are not false flags to rob us of our freedoms.

Article reposted with permission from Constitution.com

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

You Might Like
Previous 2-Year-Old Boy Killed By Alligator At Disney – Are The Beasts Of The Earth Becoming More Aggressive?
Next Merkel Prepares to Slice What Is Left of Europe’s Wrists and Give Visa Free Travel to All 80 MILLION People in Turkey

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.