This part will expose the deep-rooted connections of the Democratic Party to the Shadow Party, the Socialist Party, the Communist Party, and other anti-United States-thinking organizations. These connections reflect a Party that does not have the real intentions to help the poor, but to make more people poor and force the United States into total failure. That simple fact can be born out by showing conclusively that the Democratic Party has been against helping the poor since 1856.
We left off with the following last paragraph;
We will show more in a third article about the connections between the Socialist and Communist Parties in the Democratic Party. For now read this, pass it on, keep it in mind, and watch for the third article on this, where we will show connections to the Congressional Progressive Caucus and how that, along with a few more, aligns the Democratic Party away from the normal people and close to a dictatorship.
There is a new party built by top Democrats – in particular, by Hillary Clinton. This new party associated with and used in conjunction with the Democratic Party. Many have heard the name of this group, but many have also dismissed it as a fantasy group. Both are wrong. This party is known as “The Shadow Party.”
The “Shadow Party” is a term originally devised by journalists to describe “527” political committees promoting Democratic Partyagendas. It is here used more specifically to refer to the network of non-profit activist groups organized by George Soros and others to mobilize resources — money, get-out-the-vote drives, campaign advertising and policy iniatives — to elect Democratic candidates and guide the Democratic Party towards the left. The Internet fund-raising operation MoveOn.org is a key component. The Shadow Party in this sense was conceived and organized principally by Soros, Hillary Clinton and Harold Ickes. Its efforts are amplified by, and coordinated with, key government unions and the activist groups associated with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). The key organizers of these groups are veterans of the Sixties left. The individuals and organizations listed on this page are some of the major players, past and present, in the Shadow Party. For a comprehensive discussion of the Shadow Party, its constituent members, and its agendas and activities, click here.
Please read that until it sinks in because this shows that Hillary Rodham Clinton believes so very much in the Democratic Party that she went to see George Soros and Harold Ickes to promote left ideas that run counter to our very Constitution, and that alone brings to question why the Democratic Party has to have a “Shadow Party” as a backup. This looks more like an old science fiction movie rather than a real time happening.
Also note the most interesting person connected to the Nazi-Sympathizer George Soros, one Hillary Clinton.
Wonder why the “Shadow Party” was developed when we already had the Democratic Party? It seems that the “Shadow Party” was created in order to circumvent a law that kept big money out of elections.
“How the Ground work for the Shadow Party Had Been Laid: “Campaign Finance Reform”
George Soros had quietly laid the groundwork for the Shadow Party apparatus from 1994 to 2002. During that period, the billionaire spent millions of dollars promoting the passage of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, better known as the McCain-Feingold Act, which was ultimately signed into law in November 2002 by President Bush. Soros began working on this issue shortly after the 1994 midterm elections, when for the first time in nearly half a century, Republicans had won strong majorities in both houses of Congress.
Political analysts at the time attributed the huge Republican gains in large part to the effectiveness of television advertising, most notably the “Harry and Louise” series (which cost $14 million to produce and air) where a fictional suburban couple exposed the many hidden, and distasteful, details of Hillary Clinton’s proposals for a more socialized national health-care system.
Soros was angry that such advertisements were capable of overriding the influence of the major print and broadcast news media, which, because they were overwhelmingly sympathetic to Democrat agendas, had given Hillary’s plan a great deal of free, positive publicity for months. Three weeks after the 1994 elections, Soros announced that he intended to “do something” about “the distortion of our electoral process by the excessive use of TV advertising.” That “something” would be campaign-finance reform.
Starting in 1994, Soros’s Open Society Institute and a few other leftist foundations began bankrolling front groups and so-called “experts” whose aim was to persuade Congress to swallow the fiction that millions of Americans were clamoring for “campaign-finance reform.” This deceptive strategy was the brainchild of Sean Treglia, a former program officer with the Pew Charitable Trusts. Between 1994 and 2004, some $140 million of foundation cash was used to promote campaign-finance reform. Nearly 90 percent of this amount derived from just eight foundations, one of which was the Open Society Institute, which contributed $12.6 million to the cause. Among the major recipients of these OSI funds were such pro-reform organizations as the Alliance For Better Campaigns ($650,000); the Brennan Center for Justice (more than $3.3 million); the Center For Public Integrity ($1.7 million); the Center For Responsive Politics ($75,000); Common Cause ($625,000); Democracy 21 ($300,000); Public Campaign ($1.3 million); and Public Citizen ($275,000).
The “research” which these groups produced in order to make a case on behalf of campaign-finance reform was largely bogus and contrived. For instance, Brennan Center political scientist Jonathan Krasno had clearly admitted in his February 19, 1999 grant proposal to the Pew Charitable Trusts that the purpose of the proposed study was political, not scholarly, and that the project would be axed if it failed to yield the desired results:
“The purpose of our acquiring the data set is not simply to advance knowledge for its own sake, but to fuel a continuous multi-faceted campaign to propel campaign reform forward. Whether we proceed to phase two will depend on the judgment of whether the data provide a sufficiently powerful boost to the reform movement.”
Why does any individual or party have to create another party that “shadows” the Democratic Party? Is this done to hide money going to Democrats? Is this because they wish to hide where money comes from? So many questions arise about this “Shadow Party,” and so few receive answers. But let us show some more of this group to allow you to discover those who not only created the Shadow Party, but also those who use it to their benefit, to the dismay of the voters who know about it and secretly use it to circumvent laws.
Clear hints of Soros’ intentions began to appear as early as the 2000 election season. It was then that Soros (shouldering about one-third of the cost) sponsored the so-called “Shadow Conventions.” Organized by author, columnist, and socialite Arianna Huffington, the Shadow Conventions were media events designed to lure news crews from the real party conventions of that year. Huffington held her “Shadow Conventions” at the same time and in the same cities as the Republican and Democratic Conventions, in Philadelphia and Los Angeles respectively, and featured leftwing critics of mainstream politics. The Shadow Conventions promoted Huffington’s view that neither Democrats nor Republicans served the interests of the American people any longer. In Huffington’s view, U.S. politics needed a third force to break the deadlock.
Among the issues highlighted at the Shadow Conventions were racism, class inequality, marijuana legalization, and campaign-finance reform. Most speakers and delegates pushed a hard-left line, accompanied by “Free Mumia” chants from the crowd and an incendiary tirade by Jesse Jackson. A former conservative, Huffington told reporters: “I have become radicalized.”
The Shadow Conventions were purely symbolic affairs; they fielded no candidates for office. However, many of Soros’activities during the 2000 campaign went beyond symbolism. It was during the 2000 election that Soros first experimented with raising campaign funds through Section 527 groups. In preparation for the 2000 election, Soros assembled a team of wealthy Democrat donors to help him push two of his pet issues — gun control and marijuana legalization. Their donations greatly exceeded the limits on political contributions stipulated by campaign-finance laws. Sorostherefore laundered their contributions through Section 527 groups — dubbed “stealth PACs,” by the media of that time.
One of Soros’ stealth PACs was an anti-gun group called Campaign for a Progressive Future (CPF). This group sought to neutralize the influence of the National Rifle Association (NRA) by targeting for defeat any political candidate, at any level, whom the NRA endorsed. Soros personally seeded CPF with $500,000. During the 2000 election season, CPF funded political ads and direct-mail campaigns in support of state initiatives favoring background checks at gun shows.
Soros similarly used other 527s to agitate in favor of pro-marijuana initiatives which appeared on the ballot in various states that year. Donors to Soros’ stealth PACs during the 2000 election cycle included insurance mogul Peter B. Lewis and InfoSeek founder Steven Kirsch, both of whom would turn up as major contributors to Soros’ Shadow Party during the 2004 election season.
For an explanation of the “527” group see 527 committees. This is but a very small example of the connection of George Soros to Hillary Clinton. It also shows that they will do what they can to use terms like racism, class inequality, marijuana legalization, and campaign reform to change and move the government more towards the George Soros ideas of old Nazi Germany. The earmarks are there for people to see, they just have to strip away the added Democratic-Shadow Party ideology to see that George Soros has changed the face of politics in a way that the founding fathers never wished it to go. The solid proof of that is the move by George Soros to use one of his “stealth PAC’s” to push the group Campaign for a Progressive Future (CPF) to “neutralize the influence of the National Rifle Association.” Today, the connection with George Soros explodes with Hillary Clinton making a statement that, “if elected, I will make the NRA useless.” Or words to that affect. This shows the direct connection to a Nazi Sympathizer who learned that taking guns from the people allows the government to take over their lives. The Nazi Rule showed that from 1932 to 1945.
If you wish to see how this “Shadow Party” is connected to the present Democratic presidential candidate, see here.
Please watch for the next article showing the connection of the Socialist Party to the Democratic Party, and how the Democratic Party has actually moved further towards the Socialists side of the left. It will be coming out soon.Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.
Become an insider!
Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.