Supreme Court Rules that Illegal Aliens and Non-Citizens Can be Counted in Redistricting Case


Well, let’s just chalk this up to the supreme Court ruling on an issue it has no business in once again. In much the same manner as the court ruled in the Obamacare and marriage issue, the supreme Court of the united States has clearly overstepped its authorityThe in a recent ruling regarding states redistricting.

The Washington Times reports:

A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday that illegal immigrants and other non-citizens can be counted when states draw their legislative districts, shooting down a challenge by Texas residents who said their own voting power was being diluted.

Trending: A Denver Business Is Fined For Refusing To Pick Up Homeless People’s Poop

The ruling does not grant non-citizens power to vote, but says the principle of “one person, one vote” doesn’t require localities to only count those who are actually eligible to vote.

take our poll - story continues below

Would election by popular vote be better than the electoral college?

  • Would election by popular vote be better than the electoral college?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Justice Ruth Baden Ginsburg, writing for the court, said even though only eligible voters are supposed to cast ballots, elected officials represent all people within their districts, and it is that act of representation, not the election itself, that the boundaries are drawn to.

“As the Framers of the Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment comprehended, representatives serve all residents, not just those eligible or registered to vote,” Ginsburg wrote. “Nonvoters have an important stake in many policy debates — children, their parents, even their grandparents, for example, have a stake in a strong public-education system — and in receiving constituent services, such as help navigating public-benefits bureaucracies.”

Texas had challenge the way districts were drawn in the Lone Star state.

However, due to illegal aliens and other non-citizens, the state’s legislative districts may vary as much as 40%!

Since the Constitution is not explicit concerning redistricting, it seems clear that this falls under the prevue of the states. In other words, the supreme Court should be ignored and the states develop redistricting according to their own standards, according to the Tenth Amendment.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.

Previous You Don’t Believe Government's Involvement in Weather Modification Since 1948? This Senate Document Will Change That
Next Surrendering to ISIS Is the Only Way to Defeat It?

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.