Supreme Court: Freedom Of Speech Doesn't Stop At The Polling Place


Freedom of speech has paradoxically come more under attack at the polling place than anywhere else. Layers of regulations restrict the ability of Americans to support their candidates of choice with campaign contributions. And signs warn against electioneering around polling places. What does electioneering mean? It can mean wearing a t-shirt with a political slogan. Or any message.

Now in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that voters don't give up their First Amendment rights when they go to vote. And it is perverse that the very arena in which Americans are most empowered to express their will about how they are governed was also the area where they had least freedom to do so.

The case is Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky. It originated in 2010 when Andrew Cilek, the executive director of the conservative group Minnesota Voters Alliance, tried to vote while wearing a t-shirt adorned with an image of the Gadsen Flag, the phrase "Don't Tread on Me," and a Tea Party Patriots logo. Cilek was also wearing a "Please I.D. Me" button from the conservative group Election Integrity Watch.

Trending: Notre Dame Fire: Here’s What We Know About What Started It

This is a serious ruling that will have major implications across many states. And it's also a potent blow struck in defense of freedom of speech within a democratic election. It's not the end of the story. But it's an important victory.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Joe Biden drop out of the Presidential race because of his inappropriate touching of women?

  • Should Joe Biden drop out of the Presidential race because of his inappropriate touching of women?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

And the Individual Rights Foundation played a crucial role in that victory.

General counsel Manuel S. Klausner, the redoubtable defender of civil liberties at IRF, joined the Cato briefs twice on merits and certiorari.

As an arm of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, IRF continues to fight the good fight for freedom in the legal arena. Its faith in a free society leads it to combat government overreaches like this. And now voters across the country will be freer than ever due to the ruling of the Supreme Court and the work of the Individual Rights Foundation.

Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

You Might Like
Previous After Calling for Guns & Ammo Confiscation & Universal Gun Registration, the American Medical Association Should Think About Taking "American" Out of Their Name
Next Mark Sanford Lost his Primary Bid … to Trump

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.