Muslim migrant Dahir Adan went on a stabbing spree at a mall in St. Cloud, Minnesota in September 2016.
Dressed in a private security uniform, Adan yelled “Islam, Islam” and “Allahu akbar,” as well as asking several people whether they were Muslim before stabbing them during the Sept. 17 attack.
This was signature jihad — we have seen jihadis separate Muslim from non-Muslims during the attacks at the Oberoi Trident hotel, the Taj Mahal Palace & Tower in Mumbai, at the Westgate in Nairobi, the beach resort in Tunisia, the gas complex attack in Algeria, etc.
A little over a year later, the City Council of the same city, St. Cloud, Minnesota, rejected a moratorium on immigration.
They already suffered a jihad attack by a Muslim migrant, but it did not teach them anything.
They still either don’t know or don’t care that it is impossible to distinguish jihadi Muslims from peaceful Muslim refugees.
They either don’t know or don’t care that any Muslim who reads and believes the Quran’s verses about making war against and killing unbelievers could go jihad at any time.
To be concerned about such things is “islamophobic.”
St. Cloud’s City Council either doesn’t know or doesn’t care that the kind of jihad attack that Dahir Adan perpetrated in their city last year could happen again. And so it will.
“St. Cloud rejects resolution calling for moratorium on immigration,” by Kelly Smith, Star Tribune, November 7, 2017:
ST. CLOUD – Amid mounting national scrutiny of federal resettlement programs, the St. Cloud City Council on Monday soundly rejected a proposal by one of its members to recommend a moratorium on refugee resettlement here.
Council Member Jeff Johnson said that his measure wasn’t intended to permanently ban refugee resettlement, but rather, temporarily stop it in 2018 until the city gets details on its cost to taxpayers. “The overall quality of life” for residents will continue to be “adversely impaired by excessive demands on local resources” by those who are resettling in the city, he stated in the resolution that he presented to the council.
After hearing from supporters and opponents, the council voted down Johnson’s measure 6-1.
The City Hall meeting drew more than 300 residents, some carrying American flags while others held signs that read “All Are Welcome” — reflecting the growing and often tense debate in this city of 67,000 residents over the resettlement issue.
Earlier this summer, dozens of residents delivered a petition to the council demanding that it limit or control resettlement. But just two weeks ago, shortly after Johnson’s proposed measure was e-mailed to his colleagues, the council did just the opposite, approving by a 5-1 vote a resolution by Council Member Jeff Goerger that stated St. Cloud is a welcoming community. Johnson cast the lone dissenting vote then. On Monday, the council reaffirmed Goerger’s resolution, with Johnson casting the lone opposing vote.
Natalie Ringsmuth, executive director of #UniteCloud, a nonprofit that promotes tolerance in central Minnesota, said the vote, while symbolic, was a pivotal moment in helping St. Cloud shed a long-held reputation for being a racist, unwelcoming area.
“St. Cloud is basically stepping out and saying ‘This is who we are — we are a welcoming community,’ ” she said. “People can point to this and say St. Cloud is moving in the right direction. They can’t say we’re bigots and racists anymore. We’re not ‘White Cloud.’ ”
East African refugees — mostly Somali — first started moving to this Mississippi River city about seven years ago. Since then, Lutheran Social Service of Minnesota, the only organization that oversees refugee resettlement in St. Cloud, has helped move an average of 189 refugees a year — a total of 1,512 — to the city. The organization expects to resettle another 225 refugees here in 2018.
That’s helped to make St. Cloud not only bigger, but more diverse.
Of the more than 59,000 residents in the city in 2010, 92 percent were white. By 2015, the city had grown to 66,000 residents, 84 percent of whom were white, according to U.S. Census data American Fact Finder.
But the rapidly changing face of the community has been unsettling for some. Anti-Muslim events here have drawn crowds, mirroring rising anti-Muslim sentiment nationally. When a 20-year-old Somali refugee stabbed and wounded 10 people at a local mall in 2016, some feared that Muslims might be targeted in retaliation.
Instead, community leaders hosted unity rallies and posted signs across neighborhoods welcoming refugees and people of different faiths.
But in August, a group of residents calling themselves “St. Cloud Citizens for Transparency” presented a petition to the City Council with nearly 300 signatures from people in Minnesota and 11 other states, asking the council to control refugee resettlement. The petition was led in part by Kathleen Virnig, a St. Cloud resident, who said in an interview that residents just want the city to have a say in how many refugees are resettled and know how much it will cost.
“I have no hatred for some of these people, it’s the religious differences about their way of life,” Virnig said.
Helena Halverson, who has lived in St. Cloud since 1977, added in an interview that a moratorium would put “a pause” on refugee resettlement as the city gets more data.
“I do not like a label that I’m racist or Islamophobic,” she said before Monday’s meeting. “I do like justice and fairness and I do like transparency.”…
Article posted with permission from Pamela GellerFacebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.