Sharia Law Defense Ban Dies in South Carolina

A bill that was before the South Carolina Statehouse that would have made it illegal for Muslims to use Sharia law in defense of crimes they commit in South Carolina against our laws was narrowly defeated in the Senate on Wednesday.

Post and Courier reports:

The measure, sponsored by Charleston Republican Rep. Chip Limehouse, would have prevented an attorney from arguing that the laws of a client’s home country allow for certain actions in South Carolina.

Trending: Chinese Buying Land In US Communities All Over America

“I’m not surprised,” Limehouse said of the bill’s failure to advance. “The Senate can be the graveyard of many good ideas.”

take our poll - story continues below

Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?

  • Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Limehouse said the measure was needed to curb the advancement of terrorist organizations in the country.

“Ask the people in France,” he added. “Ask the people in Belgium what they think about laws that would limit the use of Sharia law (as a defense in court). To me a ban on Sharia law is kind of like a ban on poisonous gas. It just makes sense.”

Sharia law is the legal framework where the public and some private aspects of life are regulated under legal systems based on Islam. The bill passed the House 68-42 in January.

But the bill failed to get past the Senate Judiciary Committee, dying on a 9-10 vote Wednesday.

The bill is in essence killed for at least one year before it can be brought back up again.

According to Sen. Ronnie Sabb (D-Williamsburg), who was one of the committee members who helped defeat the bill, “I couldn’t, in good conscience, support what it represents. A law like this sends us backwards.”

Backwards? How is that? Isn’t allowing unlawful appeals to foreign gods and foreign laws going backwards? I’m talking the apostasy kind of backwards here.

Author and Islam expert Robert Spencer hit the nail on the head when he remarked on Sabb’s ridiculous comments, “Yes. What could be more forward-thinking than stonings for adultery, amputations for theft, murder of apostates, and the institutionalized subjugation of women and non-Muslims? It’s the wave of the future!”

Frankly, as one who lives in the US occupied state of South Carolina, I don’t even see why such a ban is necessary. Our laws were based upon the Law of God. As such, any attempt to appeal to other gods or laws is not only against the true and living God, but also against the laws and the people of South Carolina. Such lawlessness should be quickly and summarily by punished with justice, not allowed to be excused.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Previous Obama Issues Decree to Schools: Transgenders Use Bathrooms of Their Perceived Identity or Else
Next 77-Year-Old Montana Disabled Veteran Faces Virtual Death Sentence from EPA because He put Ponds on his Property

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.

Sorry. No data so far.