Rand Paul: “We Obey the Constitution because it Protects the Rights of All Individuals”


GOP Presidential hopeful Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) was on CBS’s This Morning on Monday defending his part in making sure that the PATRIOT Act did not get reauthorized last week. The Senate moved to bring the question up for debate last week but was stopped at every attempt – the stall tactic may succeed in stopping the PATRIOT Act altogether but that is still to be seen.

Senator Paul has been unapologetic in his drive to make sure that certain provisions in the PATRIOT Act be discarded altogether, and he shows no sign of changing his tune.

“I’m right in line with what the founders would have fought for and I am proud of the fight,” the Senator said on CBS This Morning. “The Constitution is inconvenient, but the thing is, we obey the Constitution because it protects the rights of all individuals.”

Trending: Beto compares AR-15 to bazooka in unintended support of 2A

“I think sometimes my party gets all caught up on the Second Amendment, which is fine, but we don’t protect the Fourth Amendment enough.”

take our poll - story continues below

Have smartphones made the world better or worse?

  • Have smartphones made the world better or worse?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

I, for one, have a difficult time understanding why anyone in Congress argues with Paul over this matter. The Constitution clearly says that general warrants (which were hated by our Founders) are illegal and that authorities must request specific warrants during an investigation. This does make things more difficult for the authorities, but it works to safeguard the liberty of the innocent mass of Americans. There must be a way for the government to fight terrorism without compromising the Bill of Rights or the Constitution… otherwise, what is the point of even having the Bill of Rights?

I empathize with security first politicians who want to make sure that no Americans are hurt or killed on their watch, but do they want to be known as the generation of Americans who brought about an end to our Constitutional liberties?

The NSA can redirect their efforts domestically to known terrorist sympathizers (with specific warrants) and oversees to suspected criminals, terrorists, and terrorist sympathizers. It will turn up less information, but that’s probably a good thing, as the vast majority of information the government takes in now is the useless private information of innocent American citizens. Fighting terrorism is important, but so is defending the reason we fight – our liberty.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.

You Might Like
Previous Obama Admin Went To Jeb For Common Core Tips
Next Note to 'Merica: There Is No "God-Given Right" to Worship False Gods. Repent Accordingly.

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.