Pentagon Considers Sending Heavy Weaponry Near Russia

The specter of Russian aggression in Europe has prompted the Pentagon to draw up a proposal to ship heavy weaponry and tanks for the 5,000 U.S. troops stationed in the Baltic region and Eastern Europe.

The proposal is still in draft stage and requires approval from Defense Secretary Ash Carter and the White House, The New York Times reports. If it elects to move forward, the Pentagon will begin shipping equipment to Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, with Poland, Romania and Bulgaria potentially receiving up to a battalion’s worth of military gear.

“Over the last few years, the United States military has increased the pre-positioning of equipment for training and exercises with our NATO allies and partners,” Col. Steve Warren told Reuters.

Trending: Joe Biden Speaks Early to Set Stage for Democrat Lawyers to Mount Lawsuits to Steal Election

“The U.S. military continues to review the best location to store these materials in consultation with our allies,” he added. “At this time, we have made no decision about if or when to move to this equipment.”

take our poll - story continues below

Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?

  • Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

With U.S. presence close and heavily equipped, Russia may think twice before deciding to re-engage in Ukraine. While heavy equipment isn’t the same as full-time troop presence, the idea is to provide some amount of security to U.S. allies who have expressed trepidation about Russia’s designs on former Soviet satellite states. Still, the equipment is still nothing compared to what Moscow could muster in the event of an invasion.

“We need the prepositioned equipment because if something happens, we’ll need additional armaments, equipment and ammunition,” Raimonds Vejonis, Latvia’s minister of defense, told The New York Times.

This isn’t the first time the Pentagon has mulled moving equipment over to Eastern Europe, but officials rejected previous attempts for fear that such a move would be interpreted as a violation of the 1997 agreement between NATO and Russia. Others, however, have pointed out that the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act is not in any sense legally binding and simply expressed current political intentions.

In response to questions on whether Russia would attack NATO, President Vladimir Putin brushed off worries, saying that “only an insane person and only in a dream can imagine that Russia would suddenly attack NATO. I think some countries are simply taking advantage of people’s fears with regard to Russia.”



Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like
Previous Scientists Claim to Have Discovered the “Formula for Happiness”
Next Republican Support for Trans Pacific Partnership Treaty Shows Their True Colors

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.

Sorry. No data so far.