Pastors: We Don’t Have To Obey Supreme Court On Same-Sex “Marriage”

A Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex “marriage” could be announced any day now, and pastors across the country are already saying they intend to break the law.

The Supreme Court is expected to announce a ruling on state same-sex “marriage” bans this month that could, depending on the ruling’s wording, legalize same-sex “marriage” nationwide. Anticipating the decision, religious leaders fear they’ll lose their tax exempt status and be forced to wed sodomite couples or face fines and even jail time.

A coalition of those religious leaders purchased an ad in the Washington Post Wednesday in the form of an open letter to the Supreme Court Justices, urging them to uphold traditional marriage.

Trending: Duck Duck Go’s far-left political donations and abuse of user data have users FUMING

“We are Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox Christian pastors, clergy, lay leaders and Jewish leaders, who collectively represent millions of people in our specific churches, parishes, denominations, synagogues and media ministry outreaches,” the letter reads.

take our poll - story continues below

Would You Vote for Trump If He Runs In 2024?

  • Would You Vote for Trump If He Runs In 2024?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

So far, more than 43,000 people have signed a petition supporting traditional marriage, many of them church leaders fearful that if same-sex “marriage” becomes constitutional, their refusal to participate will jeopardize their tax exempt status and even land them in legal trouble.

Pastor Robert Jeffress, who signed the letter and leads a 12,000 member congregation at First Dallas Baptist Church, compared himself to Martin Luther King for his civil disobedience.

“That may mean we experience jail time, loss of tax exempt status, but as the scripture says, we ought to obey God rather than man, and that’s our choice,” Jeffress told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Jeffress said when he announced to his congregation his decision to take a stand on the issue, they gave him a standing ovation.

Cases of legal punishment for bakers and florists who refused to serve sodomite “weddings” have fueled this fear. In Washington State, an elderly florist named Barronelle Stutzman was sued by a homosexual couple for discrimination after she refused to arrange flowers for their wedding.

She lost the legal battle and could lose everything to pay the fines. Religious leaders have warily watched Stutzman and others like her and want to preemptively protect themselves.

“We implore this court to not step outside of its legitimate authority and unleash religious persecution and discrimination against people of faith,” the letter reads. “We will be forced to choose between the state and our conscience, which is informed by clear biblical and church doctrine and the natural created order.”

During oral arguments in April, Justice Antonin Scalia raised similar concerns asking if exemptions that protected religious leaders from prosecution for discrimination would still hold if homosexual “marriage” became a constitutional right.

“But once it’s — it’s made a matter of constitutional law, those exceptions — for example, is it — is it conceivable that a minister who is authorized by the State to conduct marriage can decline to marry two men if indeed this Court holds that they have a constitutional right to marry? Is it conceivable that that would be allowed?” Scalia asked Bonauto

Scalia also questioned whether the state would give clergymen the authority to marry if they would refuse to “marry” homosexual couples.

“If you let the States do it, you can make an exception,” Scalia said. “The state can say, yes, two men can marry, but — but ministers who do not believe in same-sex marriage will still be authorized to conduct marriages on behalf of the state. You can’t do that once it is a constitutional proscription.”

These questions are the ones haunting religious leaders and driving them to have their voice heard before the ruling which is expected to come down this month.

“The Supreme Court, regardless of what they may think, is not the highest authority in the land,” Jeffress told TheDCNF.


Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like
Previous CA Vaccine Bill Passes Health Committee, Heads to Full Assembly for Final Vote
Next Famous Politician Gets Caught in His Own Web

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.

Sorry. No data so far.