Ever wonder why the Lame Stream Media just does not seem to show facts that pop up about Obama and what he did in Benghazi? Why did Obama "misdirect" the facts by saying it was a video? Why would he make sure all his subordinates would do the same? Why did all of those below Obama keep the lie going? Why was the lie started in the first place? We know that Obama has a long history of lying to the good people of the United States and world. But we have to look and see why he does all this lying. His lies could be traced all the way back to his high school days if we had his records opened, but we do know for a fact that Obama has lied from day one when he got into office, with Benghazi being the biggest lie.
Why have we not seen or heard of the release of information that shows Obama had a huge hand in the deaths of 4 United States citizens? Maybe because it would show that Obama himself has very close ties to the very people that he claimed were on the run. On November 3, 2012, the Shoebat Foundation wrote an article entitled "Libyan Leaks: More Secret Documents Reveal Obama's failure in Libya." Why has this not been out in the news each time the question of Benghazi pops up? Maybe because Obama and Hillary Clinton were complicit in the Benghazi cover up. No one is asking just how we can call Banghazi statements from these 2 leaders cover ups. We will now go to this article, which saw a brief light of day because of the implications at that time. We have to remember that this was first reported back in 2012 just before the reelection of Obama, so that alone is reason enough to see why it was suppressed back then.
The group stated they have come into possession of some highly classified documents that in their view, "will bring the Obama Administration down." They were not bluffing; they provided the first installments of official classified documents which we provided in some of our previous
reporting. "The rest," they say, "will be provided when Mitt Romney is in office. His election is our only hope for humanity," they said.
Obama's great pat upon his own back that as he stated, "Al-Qeada has been destroyed," would have exploded in Obama's face had this article we are showing now been allowed into the full press and not hidden deep in their archives. It also brings into question the so called news media, since this should have been exploding news—but it would also have shown the first black president is not only a Liar, but also a conspirator in Benghazi.
This information came from a group that wished to stop the real Al-Qeada and not the JV team Obama had in place. They had based their hopes on Mitt Romney being elected so they could produce the documents without fear of prosecution from Obama or his minions. One has to wonder where these people are today and if they are in deep hiding, fearing that Obama may well send a drone to kill them so their truth will never be shown. We took a look at a link from previous reporting and found some even more interesting news that was not shown to the world at the time—well, at least not by the Lame Stream Press. The link referred back to Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was in Benghazi for what seems to have been some sort of weapons deal. This has not been shown through documents yet, but we feel it will come out in future investigations.
A Libyan whistleblower who wrote to World Net Daily
The point everyone misses is that Ghadafi was not a radical Islamist, he kept Al Qaeda out of Libya. If it had not been for NATO, Obama and Clinton, Al Qaeda would not be in Libya and Chris Stevens would still be alive.
One has to wonder how Obama and Hillary Clinton kept straight faces while dishing out what they well knew was a lie especially while standing in front of the families of the 4 victims.
These documents include evidence of highly sophisticated weaponry provided to jihadists which leads them to doubt that any solutions will take place under what they called "The Obama regime."
We have come into the possession of an array of records obtained from top-level sources inside the Libyan government. They include passports of Al-Qaeda operatives and identifications of terrorists from many nations—Chad, Egypt and Pakistan to name a few—which are now all camped in Libya as they enter by crossing borders guarded and managed officially by what they called "government appointed Al-Qaeda leaders."
This explains why the drafts of two letters on September 11th expressing worry that the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was under "troubling" surveillance and that the Libyan government failed to fulfill requests for additional security. "It wasn't failure," these pro-U.S. agents said, "but the Libyan government's mafia-like system, subordinate to Al-Qaeda and installed with the blessings of the Obama administration that is responsible for the deaths of Americans in Benghazi," they said.
This group wanted to show that Obama and Hillary Clinton were behind a huge arms deal with Al-Qaeda rather than having Ambassador Stephens just sitting at the Embassy for the fun of it. This group did not like or wish for Al-Qaeda to be in their country and wished to show the world what they had on Obama and Hillary Clinton's dealings with Al-Qaeda. If this was a bombshell then, it would be a disaster for Hillary Clinton and Obama now, should this be passed on to the population of the United States and the world, as Obama and Hillary Clinton were deep into helping Al-Qaeda, not trying to destroy them.
The wealth of intelligence includes countless documents, which we will soon turn over to the National Center For Intelligence and Counter-Terrorism. They show evidence of bribes [see image to left] by the government to top-officials, weapons dealing, and bank siphoning by al-Qaeda operatives, to include copies of bank transactions that illustrate the subordination of the newly established Libyan government to Al-Qaeda. These included Bin Laden's personal driver Sufyan Gammou and Abdul Wahhab Hassan Qayed, the brother of the recently assassinated Abu Yahya al-Libi. Qayed was officially put in charge of Libyan border control. This arrangement is responsible for the passage of large amounts of Al-Qaeda operatives into Libya.
Look at the names of Al-Qaeda operatives shown here, some whom have been killed by Obama drones. Had they been captured, they would have exposed Obama—is that why Obama makes sure certain ones are killed by the drones?
Bin Laden's personal driver Sufyan Gammou and Abdul Wahhab Hassan Qayed, the brother of the recently assassinated Abu Yahya al-Libi. Qayed was officially put in charge of Libyan border control.
Look at just one of those killed by Obama's drone strikes:
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan: A Central Intelligence Agency drone strike in Pakistan's tribal belt killed Al Qaeda's deputy leader, Abu Yahya al-Libi, American officials said on Tuesday, dealing another blow to the group in a lawless area that has long been considered the global headquarters of international terrorism but the importance of which may now be slipping."
In one classified document (see image to right) it stated that, "it was commissioned that Fadlallah Haran Musa is to head the centers of the National Security Fares in Barqa [east of Libya] and to also commission Khalid Atiyeh to be his assistant." These two, according to our sources, are "Islamist operatives connected to Al-Qaeda."
How much more do WE THE PEOPLE have to be shown before we demand that Congress take quick and complete action on Obama and Hillary Clinton? Or is Congress mixed into this diabolical scheme of Obama's? It should not be a surprise, as it seems that Congress is keeping quiet while all sorts of information is out there to be seen by all.
We also have Sadik Belhaj (far left in photo) and Al-Sadeek Al-Ghaythi (near left)--leaders of Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and formerly close associates of Bin Laden--in charge of border security who were given large sums of money to create a special, separate force outside of the government's reach by the ministry of defense and by what the Obama administration considers to be a moderate leader,
Abdul Hakim Belhaj, who recently broke his silence on Radio Darnah on the Samir Shalwi program one day after Stevens was killed, according to pro-Qaddafi dissidents whose claims (here and here). This appearance was also confirmed by Congressman Mike Rogers. (CORRECTION on 1/17/13: While we correctly identified Al-Sadeek Al-Ghaythi as being in charge of border security, the photo to the left we identified as being of him, is incorrect. That photo is actually of Mokhtar Belmokhtar. We regret the error.)
On the program, Belhaj allegedly said the following:
"I am indeed a member of the fighting in Jemmah Islamiyah; I'm proud of it; I will not deny that. For this, I have spent the best years of my life in the prisons, under torture and I'm still a member of this group. I will not give up on its edicts. Everyone must know this in the West, before the East. I've committed Jihad operations in all parts of the globe from Morrocco to Yemen to Somalia to Algeria, even to Afghanistan and Pakistan. I give great respect to Sheikh Ayman al-Zawahri and to the first teacher, Abu Musaab al-Zarkawi. I was saddened when Hassan al-Qaidi in Pakistan was martyred. Me and my brothers Sheikh Khalid al-Sharif, Sheikh Al-Mahdi, Al-Haradi, Sheikh Hassem, Baher, Abdul Rauf, Karah have formed a committee in Tripoli and we will not allow any foreigner, no matter who he is, to dictate what we do. We give thanks to the Mujahed, Sheikh Ismail al-Salabi, for his daring proclamation to the Darnah television station and we tell him that we are with you in every word you spoke, that there is no place for America, Great Britain, and all the West in Libya. Libya is a nation of Islam and Jihad. The light of Islam will shine forth from it despite the noses of everyone. The weapons are here and the Mujahideen from every corner of the earth are here with us and we have all the weaponry—that was prohibited before—with us now. We will not hesitate to use it against anyone who touches the land of Libya and that is the end of this discussion."
The weapons Belhaj (at right) spoke about were referenced in a document Obama signed in March of 2011, a secret order known as a Presidential "finding" that authorized support for the rebel jihadism, which now could easily include an additional 20,000 missiles in Libya. According to our sources who were in Libya, the numbers are tenfold: "The Russian ambassador in Libya informed us it's really 200,000 missiles."
Does this show that Obama and Hillary Clinton were involved in arms deals with Al-Qaeda? It would seem to indicate that from what is shown here, but there is always more, and it is not good for Obama and Hillary Clinton.
The Washington Post
It's almost a certitude that at least part of the Libyan opposition includes members of al-Qaeda, said Bruce Riedel, a former senior CIA analyst and adviser to President Obama. Riedel said that anti-Gaddafi elements in the rebel stronghold of Benghazi have had "very close associations with al-Qaeda" dating back years. "I would hope that we now have a good sense of the opposition in Libya and can say that this is 2 percent, not 20 percent," Riedel said. "If we don't, then we are running the risk of helping to bring to power a regime that could be very dangerous."
Several documents officially tie Belhaj to the leadership in Libya, to the support of him by Qatar and Saudi Arabia, to his funding of the rebels in Syria, and more. As we reported previously, Belhaj is a known terrorist who was also in U.S. custody at Guantanamo. The Obama administration allowed him into Libya during the war to oust
Obama seemed to have no objection to Belhaj's leadership position after the revolution. The classified documents reveal that Belhaj actually controls most of the Libyan government, which are puppets under the control of the Islamists. The Obama administration is knowingly supporting Al-Qaeda control in Libya and North Africa.
There seems to be enough documentation here alone to force an impeachment vote on Obama and make life for Hillary Clinton more like that of a servant than a presidential hopeful. But, as with all other questions about Benghazi, why is it that Congress cannot find these things out, and why are they not moving this on? This has to make you wonder just who the people in Washington, D.C., are and whether or not they really have the best interest for the Citizens of the United States. These questions have to be answered if we as a nation are to survive. You decide, you look, and, most of all, you read and pass this on to all you know—make it become a viral question.Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.