Obama: American Troops Can’t Defeat Islamic State


Obama just admitted today in his press conference at the Pentagon that he doesn't believe American troops can defeat ISIS:

It is not enough for us to simply send an American troops to temporarily set back organizations like ISIL, but to then, as soon as we leave see that void filled once again with extremists. It is going to be vital for us to make sure that we are preparing the kinds of local ground forces and security forces with our partners that can not only succeed against ISIL, but then sustained in terms of security and in terms of governance.

We had won the war in Iraq until Obama showed up and gave it away by pulling all of our troops out. And then ISIS happened.

Trending: CENSORED event set to take on Silicon Valley's techno-fascism with Dinesh D'Souza

Now he's suggesting that American troops can't succeed against ISIS, saying that we can only 'temporarily' set them back and that they will begin again once we leave.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you support President Trump's plan to impose tariffs on Mexico?

  • Do you support President Trump's plan to impose tariffs on Mexico?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

So why leave?

Heck, if we had destroyed them in the first place in 2014 when they were much smaller, they wouldn't exist today all over the Middle East.

Also, if Obama is so interested in partnerships, why deny weapons to the Kurds who are on the front lines against ISIS? Why deny aiding Egypt in their fight against ISIS when they ask for our help?

Just more lies.

Watch:

Reporter: As an army reservist, I'm curious to know if you have any plans to send more troops overseas right now?

There are no current plans to do so. That's not something we currently discussed. I've always said that I'm going to do what's necessary to protect the homeland. One of the principles that we all agree on though – I press folks pretty hard, because in these conversations with my military advisors, I want to make sure I'm going blunt and unadulterated and uncensored advice. But in every one of the conversations we've had, the strong consensus is that in order for us to succeed long term in this fight against ISIL, we have to develop local security forces that can sustain progress.

It is not enough for us to simply send an American troops to temporarily set back organizations like ISIL, but to then, as soon as we leave see that void filled once again with extremists. It is going to be vital for us to make sure that we are preparing the kinds of local ground forces and security forces with our partners that can not only succeed against ISIL, but then sustained in terms of security and in terms of governance. Because if we try to do everything ourselves, all across the Middle East, all across N. Africa, we'll be playing whack-a-mole and there would be unintended consequences that ultimately make us less secure.

Source

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

You Might Like
Previous Emails: Obama Admin Planned Criminal Charges against Political Opposition
Next Oregon Christian Cake Bakers: “This Fight is not Over - We will Continue to Stand Strong”

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.