Obama Administration Suppresses Photos: Press Ignites in Protest

A photographer from the New York Times (NYT) has a stack of pictures that were taken at official events at the White House involving President Obama; however these pictures are not allow to be made public.

Indeed, it has become obvious that “journalists are routinely being denied the right to photograph or videotape the President while he is performing his official duties.”

White House Correspondents Association (WHCA) members (including the NYT photographer) came to Jay Carney, spokesperson for the White House, with this problem; comparing it to Russian controlled media.

Trending: Notre Dame Fire: Here’s What We Know About What Started It

Orig.src_.Susanne.Posel_.Daily_.News-size0-600x400Because images of the president are used by independent and alternative media, as well as corporate-sponsored, the way in which Obama is portrayed is important.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Joe Biden drop out of the Presidential race because of his inappropriate touching of women?

  • Should Joe Biden drop out of the Presidential race because of his inappropriate touching of women?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In controlling access to images of the president, this is one way of making sure Obama’s image remains intact.

This causes a monopoly on information.

In a letter to the WHCA, members of the press stated: “As surely as if they were placing a hand over a journalist’s camera lens, officials in this administration are blocking the public from having an independent view of important functions of the Executive Branch of government.”

Those who signed the letter to Carney includes:

• American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE)
• Associated Press Managing Editors (APME)
• White House News Photographers Association (WHNPA)
• Associated Press
• FoxNews
• Reuters
• New York Times
• Washington Post
• Yahoo News

Photographs end up in the hands of independent and alternative media which make the president look bad.

Contained in the letter: “Previous administrations have recognized this, and have granted press access to visually cover precisely these types of events, thus creating government transparency. It is clear that the restrictions imposed by your office on photographers undercuts the President’s stated desire to continue and broaden that tradition. To exclude the press from these functions is a major break from how previous administrations have worked with the press.”

The letter goes on to assert that Obama promised to have the most transparent administration in history; as well as boundaries that “raise constitutional concerns” and amount to “arbitrary restraint and unwarranted interference on legitimate newsgathering activities.”

Regardless of national security, the Obama administration has actively restricted access to independent media from infiltrating mainstream audiences and influencing public opinion.

While state-funded media is encouraged to give the official story, skeptical criticism of the current presidency is not tolerated. To control the press, Obama has taken technological advancements toward making media centralized and empowering the institutionalization of information.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

You Might Like
Previous How to Survive a Personal Economic Collapse
Next Forgotten Thanksgivings You've Probably Never Heard About

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.