NYPD Let Epstein Skip Judge-Ordered Check-Ins, DA Tried To Reduce His Registered Sex Offender Status

NYPD let convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein skip his judge-ordered check-ins.

Manhattan District Attorney’s Office once inexplicably attempted to do wealthy pedophile Jeffrey Epstein a favor by arguing that his sex-offender registry status should be downgraded from the most-dangerous classification to the “least-restrictive.” If had been granted, Epstein would have been kept off the online sex offender database.

Trending: Anti-Gun Activist Shannon Watts Isn’t Who She Seems to Be

take our poll - story continues below

Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?

  • Is the Biden Administration Destroying Our Constitution?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

NY Post:

Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein never once checked in with city cops in the eight-plus years since a Manhattan judge ordered him to do so every 90 days — and the NYPD says it’s fine with that.

After being labeled a worst-of-the-worst, Level 3 sex offender in 2011, Epstein should have reported in person to verify his address 34 times before he was arrested Saturday on federal child sex-trafficking charges.

Violating requirements of the state’s 1996 Sex Offender Registration Act — including checking in with law enforcement — is a felony punishable by up to four years in prison for a first offense.

Subsequent violations carry a sentence of up to seven years each.

But the NYPD hasn’t required the billionaire financier — who owns a $77 million Upper East Side townhouse — to check in since he registered as a sex offender in New York over the controversial 2008 plea bargain he struck in Florida amid allegations he sexually abused scores of underage girls in his Palm Beach mansion. More

NYPD cannot arbitrarily change a court order. On second thought, apparently, they can, because they did. But not legally. Which leaves one wondering what’s in it for them, doesn’t it?

Where’s all the attention on the Democratic Manhattan D.A. who also gave Weinstein a pass?

Notice how the media is focusing only on Epstein? They tried to associate Trump, but that failed. So now stories are coming out everyday about Epstein but nothing about Bill Clinton and the other liberals.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Previous Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez puts Nancy Pelosi on blast with heavy racial undertones
Next Trump holds White House summit on social media and conservative censorship

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.

Sorry. No data so far.