With the exception of what can only be perceived as the State Run Media, every other media source is filled with stories that go beyond "raising an eyebrow"; they are supplying an endless stream of incentive to begin "digging in." But will "digging in" be enough? If we simply "dig in," they will simply surround us.
There can be no doubt that the Republi-Crat Regime wants America disarmed just like Britain, Australia, etc.., They are trying every trick in the book to ban firearms, register firearms, and dry up ammunition. They are filling our Nation with 15 million illegals and wanting "amnesty" for them. Why? Is it because they know that the majority of our Armed Forces, at this moment, are primarily as conservative as they are Constitutional and will turn on them? Is that why they want sodomites and Mexicans composing the Military? And why did the Government hire 30,000 preachers and priests to teach apathy to all they do and intend to do?
Viewing the adversaries for who and what they are, and perceiving the amount of them from the Supreme Court to federal judges to state judges to the Free Masons, to the militarized police forces killing Citizens with downright "ho-hum" attitudes; it becomes very apparent that we are going to have to do something to alter their smug attitude. I believe that I have found the answer, and its composition comes from two Historical instances.
- Most of you should remember what was referred to as "Mutually Assured Destruction." An online definition is as follows: "Mutual assured destruction, or mutually assured destruction (MAD), is a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of high-yield weapons of mass destruction by two opposing sides would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender. It is based on the theory of deterrence where the threat of using strong weapons against the enemy prevents the enemy's use of those same weapons. The strategy is a form of Nash equilibrium in which neither side, once armed, has any incentive to initiate a conflict or to disarm."
- During the Vietnam War, one of the most successful strategies against the Viet Cong was the CIA sanctioned "Phoenix Program." An online definition of it is as follows: "The Program was designed to identify and "neutralize" (via infiltration, capture, terrorism, torture, and assassination) the infrastructure of the National Liberation Front of South Vietnam (NLF or Viet Cong). The CIA described it as "a set of programs that sought to attack and destroy the political infrastructure of the Viet Cong." The major two components of the program were Provincial Reconnaissance Units (PRUs) and regional interrogation centers. PRUs would kill or capture suspected NLF members, as well as civilians who were thought to have information on NLF activities. Many of these people were then taken to interrogation centers where many were tortured in an attempt to gain intelligence on VC activities in the area. The information extracted at the centers was then given to military commanders, who would use it to task the PRU with further capture and assassination missions."
Combining these two instances provides the Militia's platform of notification to elected leaders that We are not the only ones that will suffer if they through treason, apathy, or negligence create a situation in which "push comes to shove." As of right now, they have no reason to fear an attempt at pulling off a coupe against the people via a "false flag" followed by Martial Law. If they attempt this, which is something I believe that they are "licking their lips" in anticipation to, how quickly would We be able to react? And would We react in a manner that would finish this war quickly? To "get the gist" of what I am attempting to communicate, consider this statement made by Bevin Alexander in his book "How Wars are Won: The 13 Rules of War from Ancient Greece to the War on Terror":
"The connection of war with politics is frequently misunderstood. Yet war is a military act only to the extent that military forces are required to accomplish the political goal. The most memorable quotation from Carl von Clauswitz …is "war is only a continuation of state policy by other means."
From these statements, let us ask ourselves, who are the people that are "in control" of these "state policies" that are designed to eradicate our Substantive Constitutional Rights? We the People have told them that We do not want them to (or even trying) to register our guns, nor unconstitutionally adding legislative alterations that nullify our Bill of Rights unto the status of legislative "privileges." Do they listen? No. Do they even think that they will be held accountable for what they do and what they try? They obviously do not.
So here is what I say We do. (I and another are already about doing) We locate every police officer's name and address, every Magistrate's name and address, every judge's, every commissioner's, every District Attorney, every Free Mason, and every other elected official; and We post it up. They need to know, if they declare war on We the People, we know where they can be found…for which cause, they will really think twice about sending their cops against us when they will need every one of those officers to protect them! We can quickly dispose of the waste that caused this mess to begin with. Once they're dead, so are their "state policies…"Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.