A woman jogging on Guadalupe Street near the University of Texas at Austin was stopped by police for jaywalking and then arrested for failure to provide ID. Onlooker Chris Quintero witnessed the incident and caught it in a series of photographs and on video.
Quintero recounted the details of the arrest on his blog, chlorineoverdose.blogspot.com:
Maybe the plus size cops should follow her lead, and go on a jog instead of wasting tax dollars on trivial matters… just a thought.
The Daily Texan reported that there was no known effort to target jaywalkers in the area that day:
APD spokeswoman Veneza Bremner said as far as she was aware, there was no concerted effort Thursday to ticket jaywalkers.
“I don’t think there’s any initiative going on out there, but [APD officers] can go write tickets whenever they see a problem out there,” Bremner said.
Bremner said officers occasionally patrol the area even when they have not been called to address a specific crime.
“I’m not sure how often they do it, but I do know that they’re out there every now and then doing that,” Bremner said. “Whenever the call load allows, they’re proactively out there.”
APD spokeswoman Lisa Cortinas, APD officers do not target jaywalking specifically, instead they focus on pedestrian and bike safety overall.
“District representatives were working pedestrian enforcement at 24th Street and Guadalupe,” Cortinas said. “[In this case], the call is titled failure to identify.”
But what exactly does “failure to identify” mean?
The website ExCop-LawStudent explains:
The Texas Failure to Identify law is fairly simple. It states:
- (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully arrested the person and requested the information.
- (b) A person commits an offense if he intentionally gives a false or fictitious name, residence address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has:
- (1) lawfully arrested the person;
- (2) lawfully detained the person; or
- (3) requested the information from a person that the peace officer has good cause to believe is a witness to a criminal offense.
OK, it is fairly simple. If you are under arrest refuse to provide your name, date of birth, or residence address, you commit a Class C misdemeanor unless you have warrants outstanding, when it is a Class B misdemeanor. If you are either under arrest or lawfully detained, it is an offense to provide a false name, date of birth or address. The later is a Class B or A misdemeanor, dependent on whether you have outstanding warrants.
What is not an offense is refusing to provide your name, date of birth, or residence address when you are lawfully detained.
Unfortunately, this is not unusual for Texas. Police officers in this state have an idea that they have the right to identify anyone at anytime for any or no reason. The courts have repeatedly slapped them down on this.
Yet we still see police officers demand identification in Texas and threaten arrest (or actually make arrest) on Failure to Identify when in fact, no offense has occurred.
Also, from PoliceChiefMagazine.org:
A state may not make it a crime to refuse to provide identification on demand in the absence of reasonable suspicion.The Court has also held that a requirement that a detainee give “credible and reliable” identification information to the police upon request is too vague to be a criminal offense.
Current law generally does not require that ordinary pedestrians even carry documentary identification and it remains to be seen what courts will do with the issues surrounding a requirement of documentary identification.
This raises several questions: Was the jogger actually arrested? If so, was it for failure to identify? It appears that failing to provide identification in itself is not always a crime. Did the officers have reasonable suspicion that the woman was engaged in criminal conduct? Previous court cases have found violations of Fourth Amendment rights when a plaintiff was arrested for failing to identify when officers had no valid reason to suspect criminal activity. Was the jogger arrested for jaywalking? If so, why? That offense usually is punishable by a fine, not an arrest.
There has been some speculation that the woman might have been charged with resisting arrest, but isn’t pulling away when someone forcefully grabs you a natural, protective response? Experts say so, and that the charge is one of the most abused of criminal charges and is often a violation of civil rights.
Some might say the jogger should have stayed calm, but consider the facts: the woman was wearing headphones and did not appear to hear the officers yell to her. Quintero stated she was obviously startled when one of the cops grabbed her by the arm and pulled away. The incident occurred in a dangerous neighborhood, so it isn’t shocking to believe being grabbed while running would trigger some panic:
If you spend much time in the West Campus neighborhood near the University of Texas, lock your house and car and hang on to your wallet.
The neighborhood is among the 15 most dangerous in the nation for property crimes, according to a study by the Web site neighborhoodscout.com .
The area bordered by North Lamar Boulevard, West 24th Street, Guadalupe Street and West Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard was ranked sixth in the study.
It said the chance of becoming a property crime victim in a year was one in two. (source)
Sure, those statistics refer to property crime, but several violent crimes have occurred in the area:
Although officials have said the neighborhood has relatively little violence, it also has been the scene of some of Austin’s most high-profile violent crimes in recent years, including the July shooting deaths of two recent UT graduates.
Was the jogger snatched up by police for some reason that is still unknown to the public? It doesn’t seem that way, as the APD spokeswoman said the call was “titled failure to identify.”
Hopefully a full investigation into this case will be conducted. As of now, it seems like this is a case of serious over-reaction by the officers involved, and a sad example of the police state that is America.Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.