Hidden Video: Democrats Endorse Polygamy Based on Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ Arguments!

Recently, I went undercover posing as a same-sex marriage activist and asked prominent sodomite activists and Democrats the following question:

“If the purpose of marriage is to confer dignity upon individuals who love each other, then what about polygamous couples who love each other? They should be able to marry too, don’t you think?”

Shockingly, the homosexual activists and Democrats all answered, “Yes!”

Trending: Chinese Buying Land In US Communities All Over America

In one exchange, Daniel Lathbury, chair of the East Bay Young Democrats, admitted to knowing “polyamorous couples” and supporting them.

take our poll - story continues below

Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?(2)

  • Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

In another, California Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom declares that he will support a girl in a “polyamorous triad!”

In yet another exchange, former homosexual Congressman Barney Frank’s “husband” Jim Ready responds to whether or not he is in favor of marriage for polygamists. He answers, “If they love each other!” I then stated the question a second time, “I think they should be able to get married if they love each other!” and he replied, “I agree!”

There is much more.


Is it any wonder that these Democrats now support polygamy, polyamory, and who knows what else? Sodomite activists have been indoctrinating Democrats for years. Their central tenet has been and continues to be the notion that the whole case for marriage is that it is strictly about “love.” All the while, they have played down the fact that anybody can self-report to love anybody, or any number of bodies—or anything, for that matter. If love really is the basis for marriage then the first definition of marriage is actually limitless, albeit not yet explicitly declared.

Fortunately, romantic love is not the “essence of marriage.”

Stay tuned until the end of the video, where you will hear the complete case for marriage, which is grounded in human nature and discernible by the light of reason. The, “What about infertile couples?” rebuttal will be overcome. The, “What about heterosexual incest?” rebuttal will be overcome, and the, “What about heterosexual polygamy?” rebuttal will be overcome. Please listen to the whole monologue at the end. Additionally, the reason why those who self-identify as homosexual should not raise children will be made crystal clear.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like
Previous If Dylann Roof Really Wanted to Kill a Lot of Black People, He Should've Gotten a Job at Planned Parenthood
Next Southern Baptists Flip out over Same-Sex “Marriage,” Are Okay with Government-Run Children's “Education”

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.

Sorry. No data so far.