The sore loser cry babies who refuse to accept the results of American voters will do anything to make the vote of the people for Donald Trump appear illegitimate. Their lame attempts at frivolous recounts only exposed their own corruption and added votes to the Donald’s bottom line. So it is time for a new approach. Blame it on the Russians.
I remember back in the 1980s when we finally had a president with a plan to end the Cold War. These same bleeding heart limousine liberals fell all over themselves opposing the Gipper. They marched, they colluded with the enemy and they endlessly attacked him and his plan through their operatives masquerading as journalists in the Corporations Once Known as the Mainstream Media.
Now when the evidence is flimsy at best and manufactured at worst they are indignantly riding their high horses to another catastrophic defeat. Even the help of all the RINOs in Congress won’t help these repudiated Clintonistas put Humpty Dumpty Hillary back together again.
Their megaphones in the media are filling the airwaves with the lie that all our intelligence services agree the Russians hacked our election and caused the defeat of the anointed and the victory of the barbarians.
Let’s see how that squares with reality.
Top US Spy Agency Doesn't Back CIA View on Russia Hacking
According to Reuters, the leaders of the U.S. intelligence community do not embrace a CIA assessment that Russian cyber-attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the 2016 election. While the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) does not dispute the CIA's analysis of Russian hacking operations, it does not endorse their assessment because there is a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.
The position of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which oversees the seventeen agency-strong U.S. intelligence communities, gives Trump an informed position to dispute the CIA assessment.
Former Army Intel Officer Rejects Hack Theory: CIA's Brennan Playing 'Info Warfare'
A retired Army intelligence officer dismissed the theory that the Russians hacked the election in favor of Donald Trump, instead, putting forth his own theory — CIA Director John Brennan is playing political games.
Retired Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer stated that in his opinion Brennan is trying to undermine the president-elect out of deference to his old boss, President Barack Obama.
Shaffer said, "This is purely political, and I believe that John Brennan is a political animal. Everything they are telling me is Brennan is doing this out of loyalty to Ex-President Obama. It's called information operations, information warfare, and that's what I believe is going on."
Ultimately what's more dangerous the DNC hack or the criminality it exposed?
These leaked emails, whether released by Russia, China, or some teenager in his mother’s basement expose possible criminal activity by Secretary Clinton and New York’s Sixth Crime Family using her office as the launching pad for a pay-to-play scam to solicit tens of millions of dollars from foreign heads of state.
There was also evidence that Clinton's campaign staff colluded with their not-so-covert supporters over at the Clinton News Network (CNN) before one of her debates with the Donald in order to help her in the debate and sway the results of the election. As a matter of fact though they still deny it happened Donna Brazile has admitted that she shared the questions with Hillary before the debate. If that isn’t cheating and colluding to influence the vote I don’t know what is.
In addition, Clinton's campaign staff and the DNC colluded to undermine the presidential campaign of Bernie Sanders. This is what the hacked emails from the DNC reveal never mind who leaked them the truth is the truth.
Clinton's staff and members of the DNC all knew that Sanders was soliciting millions of dollars for his presidential campaign. All the while they also knew that while he was doing so, they were conspiring to do everything in their power to undermine his campaign and guarantee his failure. According to some lawyers, that could be seen as honest services fraud.
Then there is the history of American politicians working with the Russians to influence our elections. Hint: it wasn’t conservatives and it wasn’t Putin.
In an article by Michael Reagan in Newsmax:
Democrats Secretly Worked With Russia to Oppose My Dad
Former intelligence officer Herbert Romerstein dug through the Soviet archives after the fall of the USSR and uncovered secret documents written by KGB agent Victor Chebrikov. The documents revealed that Senator Edward "Ted" Kennedy had sent a friend, former Senator John Tunney of California, to contact the KGB. Tunney’s mission: undermine then-President Jimmy Carter.
On March 5, 1980, as Kennedy was challenging Carter in the primaries, Tunney met with the KGB and urged the Soviets to sabotage Carter’s foreign policy efforts. It’s amazing: Two high-ranking Democrats — a sitting U.S. senator and a former senator — sought Soviet help in undermining American foreign policy and manipulating an American election.
One 1980 document stated that Kennedy offered to condemn President Carter’s policy toward the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in exchange for KGB help. News accounts of that period prove that Kennedy did, in fact, openly criticize Carter’s Afghanistan policy.
Even more amazing: President Carter himself was also willing to jump into bed with the Soviets. In the closing days of the 1980 presidential campaign, while trailing Ronald Reagan in the polls, Jimmy Carter sent a political ally, industrialist Armand Hammer, to a secret meeting with Soviet ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin at the embassy in Washington. Hammer asked the Soviets to help Carter win votes in key states by allowing Jewish "refuseniks" to emigrate to Israel. The Soviets rejected Hammer’s request.
In January 1984, former President Carter approached Ambassador Dobrynin in person. Carter wanted to derail President Reagan’s defense buildup, and asked for help from the Evil Empire in unseating President Reagan. It’s not clear if the Soviets gave Carter what he wanted.
Then there’s Speaker of the House Thomas P. "Tip" O’Neill. He privately told Ambassador Dobrynin that it was in everyone’s best interests if the Soviets would help the Democrats keep "that demagogue Reagan" from being re-elected. O’Neill warned Dobrynin that the "primitive instincts" of this "dangerous man" would plunge the world into war.
It must have amazed Anatoly Dobrynin that these prominent liberals — Ted Kennedy, Armand Hammer, Jimmy Carter, and Tip O’Neill — all viewed President Reagan as more dangerous than any Communist dictator. Historian Paul Kengor observed that the Soviet archives showed "the lengths to which some on the political left . . .were willing to go to stop Ronald Reagan."
Why did the KGB documents come to light? They surfaced because Ronald Reagan toppled the Evil Empire, ended the Cold War, and thwarted the joint Democrat-Soviet effort to manipulate the election.
And if all else fails we could always go to the horse’s mouth. According to Fortune magazine, “Julian Assange claims Russia isn’t behind WikiLeaks’ hacked Clinton emails.”
The latest revelation in this unraveling story of Russian leaks and possible interference in the election of Donald Trump involves an explosive revelation which will no doubt be hidden from the low-information voters who receive all their news from the ABCCBSNBCCNNMSNBC CABAL.
An ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers. Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, told Dailymail.com that he flew to Washington, D.C. for a clandestine hand-off with one of the email sources in September.
Murray insisted that the DNC and Podesta emails published by WikiLeaks did not come from the Russians, and were given to the whistle-blowing group by Americans who had authorized access to the information.
Murray said, “Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians. The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”
He said “The leakers were motivated by disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.”
Here’s another bombshell exploding on the flank of the politically motivated fake news campaign by the Progressive establishment to de-legitimize the election of Donald Trump. According to Frank Gaffney in Newsmax:
In telephone conversations with Donald Trump, Ex-FBI Director (and self-admitted leaker) James Comey assured the president-elect there was no credible evidence that Russia influenced the outcome of the recent U.S. presidential election by hacking the Democratic National Committee and the emails of John Podesta, the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.
What’s more, Comey told Trump that James Clapper, the director of National Intelligence, agreed with this FBI assessment.
The only member of the U.S. intelligence community who was ready to assert that the Russians sanctioned the hacking was John Brennan, the ex-director of the CIA, according to sources who were briefed on Comey’s conversations with Trump.
"And Brennan takes his marching orders from President Obama," the sources quoted Comey as saying.
In Comey's view, the leaks to the New York Times and the Washington Post alleging that the Russians tried—and perhaps even succeeded—in tilting the election to Trump were a Democratic Party effort to delegitimize Trump’s victory.
Looking at the leaks about this whole affair former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Pete Hoekstra told Newsmax TV on Wednesday, “It is not the agency that is doing this. It is rogue employees within the CIA who are leaking this information."
Here’s the real hack that attempted to subvert our election:
The recent re-count in Michigan revealed there were too many votes in 37% of Detroit’s precincts
Detailed reports from the office of Wayne County Clerk Cathy Garrett show optical scanners at 248 of the city’s 662 precincts, or 37 percent, tabulated more ballots than the number of voters tallied by workers in the poll books.
This is the same old same old vote rigging by the Democrat machines that have presided over the destruction of our great cities. What these political hacks have done to Detroit is what they were planning for the country as a whole. In other words; the hacked emails and the frivolous re-counts exposed the Hacks. And though they did their best to steal the election and today they are fighting to keep the truth hidden, the working people of America finally got up off the couch, the silent majority final spoke with one voice, and instead of the managed decline of the Obama-Clinton CABAL we are on the road to Make America Great Again!Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.