Wow! With President Obama calling for some sort of "Climate Change" operation, one has to wonder just what is going on, especially since the very idea of Obama's plan for "Climate Change" has been turned down by the entire Congress from both sides of the aisle! But once we dig into some articles from back in 2011, we see that the very idea of "Global Warming" came from an Austrian Nazi in 1958! Just read the article below to see what it sounds like.
The Nazi Origins of Apocalyptic Global Warming Theory
One of the primary pioneering theorists on apocalyptic global warming is Guenther Schwab (1902-2006), an Austrian Nazi.[i] In 1958, Schwab wrote a fictional novel built off of Goethe's (1749-1832) Faustian religious play entitled "Dance with the Devil." While a few scientists since the late 1800's had contemplated the possibility of minor global warming coming from industrial pollution, Schwab used Goethe's dramatic approach to convert the theory into an apocalyptic crisis. The book outlines many looming environmental emergencies, including anthropogenic global warming. Guenther Schwab's very popular novel was an apocalyptic game changer. By the early 1970's, it had been translated into several languages and had sold over a million copies.
The success of Schwab's book helped him to establish an international environmental organization called "The World League for the Defense of Life." Not surprisingly, Werner Haverbeck, former Hitler Youth member and Nazi environmental leader of the Reich's League for Folk National Character and Landscape, later became the chairman of Schwab's organization. In 1973, Haverbeck blamed the environmental crisis in Germany on American capitalism. It was an unnatural colonial import that had infected Germany like a deadly foreign body.
Now we can go on with many more items like this, but we wish to show a few items that need to be exposed to show the entire idea of "Global Warming" is wrong. Like any Socialist about to lose an argument, they change the name; and, in this case, they went from "Global Warming" to "Climate Change." Nothing unusual about this, since they always change the names when they are found to be wrong in their view.
We have so much data which shows that, contrary to what Obama is spewing out, "Global Warming" is just a means to "redistribute" the wealth. Now, we will present some links and our own "opinion" of just what this "Global Warming, Climate Change" is and just how stupid one has to be to follow the very idea, once the Scientists tell their side.
Let us begin with the largest problem facing the "Global Warming, now Climate Change' ideologists—we have to remember that the very idea began while Al Gore was in college, and his professor, Roger Revelle, came up with the idea. It was widely accepted that a panel was to convene and make a report on this. It was then that the United Nations brought together some people and a couple of scientists to find out what they could about this problem of Global Warming. This panel of blue ribbon United Nations appointed people was called the International Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC for short. They did a very intense study, which, according to the United Nations, was done without any false data.
That shows how the IPCC began; now, let us move up to around 2007, when it was disclosed that much of the data that the IPCC had used was indeed false and altered. That was called "Climategate," and it really hit home, since e-mails were shown that detailed just how extensive the flawed deception was. Below are a few of the writings from the IPCC, which proved their own theory wrong.
"I think the only thing that counts is numbers. The media is going to say '1000 scientists signed' or '1500 signed'. No one is going to check if it is 600 with PhDs versus 2000 without. They will mention the prominent ones, but that is a different story." - Joseph Alcamo, Lead Author, IPCC (2001, 2007)
"But the current diagram with the tree ring only data [i.e. the Briffa reconstruction] somewhat contradicts the multiproxy curve and dilutes the message rather significantly." - Chris Folland, Lead Author, IPCC (1990, 1992, 1996, 2001)
"everyone in the room at IPCC was in agreement that this [the Briffa reconstruction] was a problem and a potential distraction/detraction from the reasonably concensus viewpoint we'd like to show w/ the Jones et al and Mann et al series." - Michael Mann, Lead Author, IPCC (2001)
"So, if we show Keith's series in this plot, we have to comment that "something else" is responsible for the discrepancies in this case. [Perhaps Keith can help us out a bit by explaining the processing that went into the series and the potential factors that might lead to it being "warmer" than the Jones et al and Mann et al series?? We would need to put in a few words in this regard] Otherwise, the skeptics have an field day casting doubt on our ability to understand the factors that influence these estimates and, thus, can undermine faith in the paleoestimates. I don't think that doubt is scientifically justified, and I'd hate to be the one to have to give it fodder!" - Michael Mann, Lead Author, IPCC (2001)
"I never liked it that the 2001 IPCC report pictured Mann's without showing alternates. [...] It now seems clear from looking at all the different analyses that Mann is an outlier" - Curtis Covey, Research Scientist, Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline." - Phil Jones, Director, Climatic Research Unit (CRU)
The above reference link shows a lot more of why the IPCC and United Nations produced flawed and misleading information when true studies showed Climate Change/Global Warming to be nothing more than a drawn out plan to divert money from the rich nations to the poor ones. But we have to show a bit more to allow you to see that the entire ideology of Climate Change/Global Warming is nothing more than a move by the United Nations to "control" our nation.
Now, let us consider the very recent cold spells we have had; does anyone remember the very cold winter our nation - and the world, for that matter - went through? If we listen to Al Gore and others, we hear that Antarctica is melting and the ice sheet is shrinking. But the truth is that this year, it has grown more than decades of records show.
"Someone let Al Gore know the South Pole isn't melting. Antarctic sea ice coverage reached record levels for April, hitting 3.5 million square miles — the largest on record.
It was a cold summer down in Antarctica, with sea ice coverage growing about 43,500 square miles a day, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSDC). April 2014 beats the previous sea-ice coverage record from April 2008 by a whopping 124,000 square miles.
But even with autumn in full swing in the South Pole, "record levels continue to be set in early May," reports the NSDC. Sea ice levels have been "significantly above" satellite data averages for 16 consecutive months.
The most pronounced growth in sea-ice coverage is in the eastern Weddell Sea and areas south of Australia and along the southeastern Indian Ocean, according to NSDC. And temperatures in the Weddell Sea region have been 1 to 2 degrees Celsius below the 1981 to 2010 average during March and April. Similar cooling trends have lowered average temperatures along the southern Indian Ocean by 2 to 3 degrees Celsius."
We show below some links of scientists who believe that our world is actually cooling:
Global Cooling is Here (Don J. Easterbrook, Ph.D. Professor of Environmental Geology)
Global warming freeze? (David Deming, Ph.D. Professor of Geology and Geophysics)
Read the sunspots: Prepare now for dangerous global cooling (R. Tim Patterson, Ph.D. Professor of Earth Science)
Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh (Philip K. Chapman, B.S. Physics and Mathematics, M.S., Ph.D. Instrumentation, MIT)
The Coming Ice Age (David Deming, Ph.D. Professor of Geology and Geophysics)
There IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998 (Robert M. Carter, Ph.D. Professor of Environmental and Earth Science)
While the sun sleeps (Henrik Svensmark, Ph.D. Director of the Center for Sun-Climate Research, Danish National Space Center)
World is getting colder (David J. Bellamy, B.Sc. Ph.D. C.Biol. FIBiol. Professor of Botany)
Year of Global Cooling (David Deming, Ph.D. Professor of Geology and Geophysics)
Let us now show some historic presentations that say we are going into a cooling period, no matter what Obama and the United Nations may say.
1895 - Prospects of another Glacial Period (PDF) (The New York Times)
1912 - Sees Glacia Era Coming; Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age (The New York Times)
1969 - New Ice Age Threat Seen (St. Petersburg Times, January 15, 1969)
1969 - Worrying About a New Ice Age (The New York Times, February 23, 1969)
1969 - Ice Age Biggest Threat According to Archeologist (The Hartford Courant, November 21, 1969)
1970 - Colder Winters Held Dawn of New Ice Age - Scientists See Ice Age In the Future (The Washington Post, January 11, 1970)
1970 - Is Mankind Manufacturing a New Ice Age for Itself? (L.A. Times, January 15, 1970)
1970 - New Ice Age May Descend On Man (Sumter Daily Item, January 26, 1970)
1970 - Pollution Could Cause Ice Age, Agency Reports (St. Petersburg Times, March 4, 1970)
1970 - Pollution Called Ice Age Threat (St. Petersburg Times, June 26, 1970)
1971 - U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming (The Washington Post, July 9, 1971)
1971 - Ice Age Around the Corner (Chicago Tribune, July 10, 1971)
1971 - New Ice Age Coming - It's Already Getting Colder (L.A. Times, October 24, 1971)
1972 - Air pollution may cause ice age (Free-Lance Star, February 3, 1972)
1972 - Scientist Says New ice Age Coming (The Ledger, February 13, 1972)
1972 - Scientist predicts new ice age (Free-Lance Star, September 11, 1972)
1972 - British expert on Climate Change says Says New Ice Age Creeping Over Northern Hemisphere (Lewiston Evening Journal, September 11, 1972)
1972 - Climate Seen Cooling For Return Of Ice Age (Portsmouth Times, September 11, 1972)
1972 - New Ice Age Slipping Over North (Press-Courier, September 11, 1972)
1972 - Ice Age Begins A New Assault In North (The Age, September 12, 1972)
1972 - Weather To Get Colder (Montreal Gazette, September 12, 1972)
1972 - British climate expert predicts new Ice Age (The Christian Science Monitor, September 23, 1972)
1972 - Scientist Sees Chilling Signs of New Ice Age (L.A. Times, September 24, 1972)
1972 - Another Ice Age? (Time Magazine, November 13, 1972)
1973 - The Ice Age Cometh (The Saturday Review, March 24, 1973)
1973 - Weather-watchers think another ice age may be on the way (The Christian Science Monitor, December 11, 1973)
1974 - New evidence indicates ice age here (Eugene Register-Guard, May 29, 1974)
1974 - Another Ice Age? (Time Magazine, June 24, 1974)
We could list another 25 pages of this type of links to articles that have called for Global cooling instead of warming, from 1969 until 2011.
Let us show some items about Obama's dear friend, Al Gore.
"Hoaxes: As the nation digs itself out, the grand wizard of global warming comes out of hiding and blames it all on that SUV stuck in your driveway. A blizzard is a terrible thing to waste.
What has been dubbed the Groundhog Day Blizzard has caused Al Gore to poke his head out of his massive carbon-generating mansion in Nashville, Tenn., to blame the 2,000-mile storm on our alleged obsession with fossil fuels.
Sorry, Al, but in Chicago the solar panels were buried under upward of two feet of snow as citizens cranked up those polluting snow blowers, a scene repeated in much of the country. In the middle of blowing snow, blowing smoke does not help. Get our drift?"
The ClimateGate scandal was a direct result of scientists — and we use the term loosely — at Britain's Climate Research Unit and others, such as Michael Mann, conspiring to manipulate data to "hide the decline" in global temperatures.
Mann was the architect behind the famous hockey-stick graph produced in 1999. It really should have been dubbed the hokey stick, since it was developed by Mann using manipulated tree ring data. It supposedly proved that air temperatures had been stable for 900 years, then soared off the charts in the 20th century.
The assessment reports of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have been exposed as fraudulent accumulations of anecdotal evidence and speculation.
Case in point was the claim in its 2007 report that the Himalayan glaciers would disappear by 2035. It was not based on any scientific study or research, but on one scientist's speculation in a telephone interview with a reporter.
Some Himalayan glaciers are, in fact, advancing, and a report by scientists from the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the University of Potsdam said there was "no uniform response of Himalayan glaciers to climate change" and highlighted "the importance of debris cover for understanding glacier retreat."
With just this bit of information, we can readily see that this "Climate Change, Global Warming" ideology is perhaps the largest hoax ever proclaimed to mankind. In the article below, it is revealed just how expensive it is to partake in the dumb idea of "Carbon Tax."
Funds – Labels Carbon Tax an Act of Economic Vandalism
"Is it possible for America to learn from the mistakes of others?
Australia was ahead of America in making an ill-advised decision to impose a national carbon tax on their citizens. Now they will also lead America retreating from their economic foolishness.
More than 90 percent of the funds related to global warming have been axed from upcoming budget considerations, down to $500 million from a previous level of $5.75 billion.
Leftists and environmental authoritarians are beside themselves but the conservative government of Prime Minister Tony Abbott has promised still more sanity is on the way.
While climate alarmists rail against the move, Abbott describes the cuts as vital to reducing the size of Australia's government and improving the economy."
Here, we can readily see that if Australia is not having success with this fool plan, why should the United States even consider it? Of course Congress has already decided not to go through with this plan, but Obama has his head of the EPA working out plans to implement this "Carbon Tax."
With all this shown, we do hope that you will pass this on and allow others to see that what Obama and the United Nations have planned for the United States is not good for the people. We do have to mention that wind and solar cannot produce anywhere near the same as natural gas or oil. Just 1 natural gas-fired plant can produce enough electricity for 5 million homes and to do that with wind and solar would mean moving people from the west coast to the remaining areas of the nation, since windmills and solar panels would take up all of the West Coast, leaving no room for people, not to mention killing millions of animals. Our nation has more natural gas and oil than the entire world. Obama does not wish to make our nation the world leader in energy, he wants to take us back to the ice age. "WE THE PEOPLE" can change this dumb idea this November, but we have to get off our butts and go vote. If we do not, our nation will lose as will our freedom!Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.