Democrat Senator Shockingly Calls for Investigation into Lynch Providing Cover for Clinton Campaign

I have to admit I’m a little shocked at that Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said that Congress should investigate whether or not former Attorney General Loretta Lynch put pressure on former FBI Director James Comey to cover for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

“I think we need to know more about that,” Feinstein told host Brianna Keilar on CNN’s “State of the Union.”  “And there’s one way to know about it, and that’s to have the Judiciary Committee take a look at that.”

Feinstein the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee went on to comment about Comey’s Thursday testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Trending: The Facts about the Death of Justice Scalia are Quite Suspicious

The California senator said in response to Comey’s claims of feeling “queasy” that Lynch asked him to refer to his investigation into Clinton’s emails as a “matter” rather than an investigation, that it would have made her feel queasy too.

take our poll - story continues below

Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?(2)

  • Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“I would have a queasy feeling, too, though, to be candid with you,” she said.  “I think we need to know more about that, and there’s only one way to know about it, and that’s to have the judiciary committee take a look at that.”

She then added that she did not want to mix the ongoing investigation into alleged Russian interference in the elections with a new one concerning Lynch and the Clinton campaign.

Feinstein also said she had not made a decision on whether Comey’s testimony with regard to President Trump’s interactions with him concerning the investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn amount to obstruction of justice.

“I don’t know whether it’s obstruction of justice,” she said.  “I don’t intend to draw any conclusions until investigations are finished.”

Trump has denied some of the statements Comey made with regards to him asking Comey to let the investigation into Flynn go and claims of pledging loyalty.  He then added that he was 100 percent willing to testify under oath.

In that end, unless there is a third party that can collaborate the claims of either man, it’s a “he said, he said” scenario.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like
Previous Geller on Pro-Sharia Law Marches: Sharia is "Misogynistic, Anti-Infidel, Anti-Free Speech"
Next The Next Financial Crisis Has Already Arrived In Europe, And People Are Starting To Freak Out

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.

Sorry. No data so far.