Cyber Expert: Hillary Clinton’s Server Exposed Classified Information, Which is Illegal

And yet, Hillary Rodham Clinton is not only free, but she is running for the Oval Office! This week, House Committee on Science, Space and Technology Chairman Lamar Smith questioned Telos Corporation CEO and Chairman John Wood whether or not his company would engage in the kind of activity that the former Secretary of State did concerning her personal email server. “That would be imprudent and would also be illegal,” said Wood.

“Let’s say a senior government official at an execute branch department approached your company to set up a private email server for conducting official and personal business,” Smith began a hypothetical, yet real, scenario. “These emails could include sensitive or classified information about national security. In addition, emails could be stored on a private server stored in their private residence.”

Trending: Duck Duck Go’s far-left political donations and abuse of user data have users FUMING

“Cyber attacks and obvious intrusions would be obvious threats among other security risks,” he added. “The material being transmitted from a private email account could be a matter of national security.”

take our poll - story continues below

Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?(2)

  • Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Wood then followed up with two questions:

  1. Could this scenario expose classified information to being hacked?
  2. How would your company respond to such a request?

To the first question, Wood answered an unequivocal “Yes.”

On the second question, Wood elaborated, “We wouldn’t do it. You are exposing classified data in the open. At the end of the day, that would be imprudent and would also be illegal.”

When asked why it would be illegal by Smith, Wood answered, “The government requirement is that all official information be used through official means, meaning government networks.”

So, the obvious question, on top of a plethora of testimony and documentation is why has there been no indictment of Hillary Clinton? Why has there been absolutely no move on the part of this committee nor the Benghazi committee, led by Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) to indict this woman parading herself around as a viable candidate for the office of the presidency?

My guess is that it is a demonstration of just how far the corruption has run, and yes, like it or not that corruption has spread into even Republican favorites who somehow say the right things, but fail to bring the resolve of justice.

I truly wish there was someone in office, any one, who would step forward and begin the process to bring Mrs. Clinton, as well as the usurper-in-chief, to justice!

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Previous 1,180 Documented Examples of Barack Obama’s Lying, Lawbreaking, Corruption, Cronyism, Hypocrisy, Waste, Etc.
Next Georgia’s SunTrust Banks Go Pro-Sodomite and Against Religious Liberty

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.

Sorry. No data so far.