Congress Ready to Charge AG Sessions With Contempt of Congress Over FBI Docs

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, already facing scorn from President Donald Trump, who thinks he’s doing a poor job at the Department of Justice, now may face additional fire — this time, from Congress.

Jeff Sessions may be on his last legs at the Department of Justice.

Rep. Devin Nunes reportedly wants to hold Sessions in contempt.

He’s the House Intelligence Committee chairman, and he’s pushing hard for his colleagues to get on board with the idea, saying the Justice Department has stymied way too many of his records’ requests.

Trending: Duck Duck Go’s far-left political donations and abuse of user data have users FUMING

From the Washington Examiner:

take our poll - story continues below

Would You Vote for Trump If He Runs In 2024?

  • Would You Vote for Trump If He Runs In 2024?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes announced Sunday he’s going to push Congress this week to hold Attorney General Jeff Sessions in contempt of Congress.

This extreme step is a culmination of the frustration the California Republican explained he’s felt in dealing with a Justice Department that had stymied his requests for information, during the panel’s government surveillance investigation.
In particular the committee has been looking into allegations of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act surveillance abuses by the Justice Department and FBI that led to spying on former Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

Two weeks ago, Nunes sent a classified letter to Sessions, which he said was not acknowledged. That was followed by a subpoena last week.

“Then on Thursday we discovered that they are not going to comply with our subpoena,” Nunes said on “Fox and Friends Sunday.”
A Justice Department official shared the letter sent to Nunes on Thursday with the Washington Examiner, which explained that the decision was made after consulting the White House.

“After careful evaluation and following consultations with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the White House, the Department has determined that, consistent with applicable law and longstanding Executive Branch policy, it is not in a position to provide information responsive to your request regarding a specific individual,” Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote in the letter.

“Disclosure of responsive information to such requests can risk severe consequences, including potential loss of human lives, damage to relationships with valued international partners, compromise of ongoing criminal investigations, and interfere with intelligence activities,” Boyd added.

The letter also stated that the DOJ was willing to discuss other ways to accommodate the House Intelligence Committee’s oversight inquiry.

But, when asked what he is going to do in response, Nunes said on Sunday “the only thing left to do is we have to move quickly to hold the attorney general of the United States in contempt and that is what I will press for this week.”

The chairman didn’t disclose what exactly he seeks. He called it “very important” information.

Nunes also said he’s not going to take any “excuse” that relates to concerns about national security. “How many times have we heard this argument throughout this investigation?” he asked.

Nunes conceded that it’s possible Sessions personally is not yet aware of his subpoena, which he said he will probably take to court to try and enforce it. Nunes also said he’s already spoke to FBI Director Christopher Wray about the matter.

Back in February, Nunes’ panel secured the release, without redactions, of a memo which outlined abuses by the FBI and the Justice Department against the Trump campaign, particularly in the write-up and approval of FISA warrant applications to spy on Page.

Soon after, the Democrats on the committee saw the release of their rebuttal memo, albeit with redactions, seeking to add context and push back on some of the assertions the GOP memo made.

More recently, Nunes pressed the DOJ to show the document says prompted the FBI’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and possible collusion with the Trump campaign. Nunes, ranking member Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and all members of the committee were provided access to the requested document by the April 11 deadline.

Appearing on Fox News after the Nunes interview, House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., echoed Nunes’ frustration with the DOJ’s reluctance to comply with congressional oversight requests and said he “strongly” supports the chairman’s work, though he didn’t say whether leadership would take up a contempt of Congress vote.

As Nunes noted during the Fox News interview, Congress previously held former top Internal Revenue Service official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress in 2014 for refusing to testify before a House panel about the targeting of conservative groups seeking tax exempt status, and former Attorney General Eric Holder in 2012 for refusing to turn over documents related to Operation Fast and Furious, a bungled gun-tracking program.

Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller

Pamela Geller’s commitment to freedom from jihad and Shariah shines forth in her books

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like
Previous Pelosi Less Popular Than Trump, Paul Ryan and the NRA
Next The Real Border Problem Is Bigger Than A Wall

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.

Sorry. No data so far.