Bureau of Land Management Forecloses Oil Leasing - Utah Sues


In yet another spat between the Bureau of Land Management and a western state, Utah is suing the federal agency after it unlawfully foreclosed oil and gas leasing on unprotected lands. (RELATED: BLM to Cease Bundy Ranch Operation - Cows Come Home)

Utah's litigation alleges that the BLM is imposing 'wilderness criteria' on lands outside designated wilderness and wilderness study areas. Uintah County and the Utah Association of Counties is joining the suit, claiming that they have been left out of key management decisions.

In response, federal lawyers argued that Utah had failed to show actionable injury arising from the BLM's move, given that the agency has not actually reached a final decision and is temporarily assessing the lands for conservation value.

Trending: Bombshell: Media Blackout As DOJ Announces Obama Accepted At Least $21.6 Million In Foreign Donations For 2012 Re-Election

Disputes like these are part and parcel of why title to federal lands west of the Colorado/Nebraska line should be transferred over to western states for better and more efficient management, said Carl Graham, director of Sutherland Institute's Center for Self-Government in the West, Wednesday at an event hosted by Americans for Tax Reform.

take our poll - story continues below

Do you support President Trump's plan to impose tariffs on Mexico?

  • Do you support President Trump's plan to impose tariffs on Mexico?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

recent study conducted by the Nevada Public Land Management Task Force discovered that state-managed lands yielded gains of $28.59 per acre, while BLM-managed lands resulted in a loss of 91 cents per acre.

"Western lands have provided cheap, abundant and often renewable food, energy, minerals, timber and reaction for the entire nation for generations. Who better to conserve and steward those resources than the people who live in the lands and have tended them for generations?" Graham argued.

The Forest Service pointed out in its own 2002 study, The Process Predicament, that current administrative requirements prevent adequate management of the National Forest System. Post-decisional appeals and litigation create increased gridlock, making responsible management impossible.

"This affects people on the east coast. They are paying billions of dollars a year to manage federal lands. They're paying for the privilege of keeping the west from being productive," said Graham.

"The idea that you can only manage lands from Washington, DC rather than the people who have been on the ground for generations is ludicrous on its face and insulting. This is all a control issue."

Source

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

You Might Like
Previous Obama is Applying Cloward Piven Strategy to Immigration Policies
Next Bombshell: Benghazi Filmmaker CONFIRMED To Be An Agent Of Eric Holder Justice Department

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.