Britain Is Now Paying to Be Silenced


For years, we have seen the offended and the thin-skinned being used to take more and more freedom from society. Many now have the expectation of living in an offense-free world. Never should what they do, believe, think, or look like be spoken ill of in public or private.

With this impossible and stupid aim in view, Britain passed Section 127 of the Communications Act, in 2003. This has been used to prosecute offenses by pastors and football fans. And now, the ever present threat of prosecution is spreading.

Breitbart reports:

Trending: Private Border Wall Construction Firm Ordered to Cease Construction

The office of London’s first Muslim mayor has secured millions of pounds to fund a police “online hate crime hub” to work in “partnership with social media providers” to criminalise “trolls” who “target… individuals and communities.”

take our poll - story continues below

Will Democrats win the house and senate in 2020?

  • Will Democrats win the house and senate in 2020?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The London mayor’s office for policing and crime (Mopac) will spend £1,730,726 of taxpayer’s money policing speech online after applying for a huge grant from the Home Office Police Innovation Fund (PIF), it was announced in a statement.

“The purpose of this programme is to strengthen the police and community response to this growing crime type” is was announced, and will “involv[e] a dedicated police team” backed by “volunteers”,

What this will mean is that anything that others do not want to hear or read on the internet could land the writer or speaker in jail. But, there is a problem with this kind of policing: who decides what is and is not offensive?

Who determines what speech is allowed? Further, we should ask, by what standard shall we be judged to have been offensive?

Breitbart continues:

The law criminalises “using [a] public electronic communications network in order to cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety,” and can result in a six-month prison term or fine of up to £5,000.

But this vague notion of criminality is open to a broad interpretation. It will be one way that the left will silent all opposition. It sure will mean the death of free speech in Britain.

Article reposted with permission from Constitution.com

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.

Previous Texas Says No to Refugees without Security Guarantees
Next Venezuela Destroys Thousands of Guns: “Renewal Of Efforts To Disarm” Hungry, Angry Population

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.