The U.S. Supreme Court to take up the case on President Trump’s financial records.

The Supreme Court said Friday it will hear three cases next year involving President Trump’s financial records. Trump has sought to keep his tax and bank records private, and rulings against him could result in the quick release of personal financial information, the Associated Press wrote. Arguments are set to take place in late March with decisions poised for June.

.@realDonaldTrump will get the chance to defend himself in March when all three major financial cases for his financial records will be heard in front of the Supreme Court.https://t.co/Cw113JmNg5

— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) December 13, 2019

NBC:

Trending: "Sexual Pleasure & Response In Infants" Lesson Now Being Taught At University Of North Texas

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Friday to hear President Donald Trump’s appeal of lower court orders, now on hold, that require his banks and accountants to turn over financial records to the House and local prosecutors in New York.

take our poll - story continues below

Will the Democrats Allow Bernie to get Democrat Nomination?

• Liberals want the Electoral College Abolished. How About You?  

• Will the Democrats Allow Bernie to get Democrat Nomination?*
  • Yes! They hate Trump that much
  • No
• Email*
• Name
  This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The cases could yield major rulings on the power of the House to demand records for its investigations and the authority of a president to resist such demands. By granting review now, the justices made it possible for these cases to be heard during the current court term, in March, with a decision by the end of June — just as the general election campaign heats up.

“We are pleased that the Supreme Court granted review of the President’s three pending cases,” Trump attorney Jay Sekulow said in a statement. “These cases raise significant constitutional issues. We look forward to presenting our written and oral arguments.” More

Democrats have not shown cause for requesting his records. They have not shown they have anything which shows illegal financial transactions.

Just because they want something to smear President Trump with and to harass him, his family and business partners is not a justifiable reason for disclosure. If they can do it to him, they can do it to anybody.