Belittled MAGA student’s lawsuit against defamatory newspaper tossed by judge

In this new digital world of perpetuity, there is little that you can do to prevent your life from being recorded at every turn.

For those engaging in social media mischief, the future could be a rocky one.  Your every tweet, Yelp review, or video purchase could be subject to review by a future employer or spouse.  Heed the warning, folks.

But what happens when you don’t go willingly into the fray?  What happens when you find yourself in an awkward situation, with a camera in your face, and for the rest of your life you are now that person on that video?

Trending: Duck Duck Go’s far-left political donations and abuse of user data have users FUMING

That’s exactly what happened to one young man some months ago in Washington DC as he was confronted by protesters while on a high school field trip.  A photo of his awkward smile was construed as condescending in the mainstream media and, because of the student’s “Make America Great Again” hat, the story went viral.

take our poll - story continues below

Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?(2)

  • Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The young man took legal action in a bid to clear his name, and the verdict is finally in.

A federal judge in Kentucky Friday threw out a defamation lawsuit filed against The Washington Post by Covington Catholic High School student Nicholas Sandmann and his family over the paper’s reporting of an incident between the young man and a Native American man this past January in Washington.

The lawsuit, which was filed in February, sought $250 million in damages and accused the Post of practicing “a modern-day form of McCarthyism” by targeting Sandmann and “using its vast financial resources to enter the bully pulpit by publishing a series of false and defamatory print and online articles … to smear a young boy who was in its view an acceptable casualty in their war against the president.”

In part of the ruling, the judge noted that the Washington Post did not mention Sandmann by his name in their original article on the incident.


Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like
Previous POTUS inks new deal with Guatemala to rein in asylum overload
Next Revenuers now eyeing cryptocurrency holders with threatening tax letters

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.

Sorry. No data so far.