Barack Obama, commenting in front of his Muslim-styled curtain on engaging Syria, said “I think we have both a moral obligation and a national security interest in a) ending the slaughter in Syria, but b) also ensuring that we’ve got a stable Syria that is representative of all the Syrian people.” Just take a moment and let these words sink in.
Contrast this with Obama’s views on abortion, infanticide, Planned Parenthood and even the ongoing Gosnell trial. Does this strike you as a man that is really concerned with ending slaughtering? While it may be true that he is talking about Syria, he is apparently just fine with the slaughter of millions of innocent children at the hands of their mothers and paid clinical hit men for a couple of hundred bucks. In fact, Obama’s administration is perfectly fine with demanding that you help fund sterilizations, contraceptives and abortion-inducing drugs.
On another note, listen as Barack Obama speak as though the United States is to control Syria. He says that once the current leadership exits the stage “we” can “begin a political transition process.” We? I didn’t know Obama was a citizen of Syria. Perhaps he is in some way, but here “we” go trying to topple another foreign government and we’ll replace it with one that will be even more hostile to us.
He talks about “investments.” He’s really talking about giving our money to foreigners. In fact, he says “we” are invested in humanitarian aid and the opposition in Syria. The opposition? The opposition in Syria is comprised of Al-Qaeda. Even his GOP rival in the 2012 election voiced his support of arming these rebels. It seems so clear to me that Barack Obama aligns himself with the Islamic terrorists at every turn. By his own signature to the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and by his own words he should be taken into custody as aiding and abetting members of Al-Qaeda, but he’s a “Do as I say, not as I do” kind of guy.
He even said his administration is providing “non-lethal” assistance to the opposition.
Obama continually uses the term “investing.” In doing so, he doesn’t want to come right out and tell you that he is using our tax dollars to fund, whether lethal or non-lethal, members of Al-Qaeda to overthrow a foreign government and you can bet those tax dollars that jihadists will move in, just like in Libya and take over, courtesy of American’s hard earned dollars and a wicked man in the Oval Office.
Finally, take notice of how Obama fiddles with his “red line.” He talks about a perceived red line and then states that he has evidence that chemical weapons are used, but then drops back to talking about perception, rather than evidence.
Obama’s comment, “That there have been several instances during the course of my presidency where I said I was going to do something and it ended up getting done” was simply hilarious. He obviously wasn’t referring to Guantanamo Bay being shut down, the transparency of his administration, turning the economy around, providing better and less expensive healthcare, lowering taxes or actually ending wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
What he was referring to was Osama bin Laden and Muammar Gaddafi. He said this gave the international community a sense of the fact that his administration typically follow through on their commitments.
Frankly, his answers in this video clip are a joke. The man does not know how to govern. I’d actually be amazed if he knew how to balance a checkbook. Just keep in mind that this man doesn’t mind the slaughter of Americans at home and abroad, whether they are in the womb, just born or even whether they are U.S. ambassadors.