Atheist Group Is Suing This TN Sheriff For Posting This On Facebook


There are those people that claims everything hurts them. No matter what happens, they are now emotionally scarred. They cry victim at every turn and seek to make others pay out for their pain.

We as a nation, in an effort to protect real victims, have created these people. Much like parents who give the whiny child the attention they desire, we have created a whiny society. And we are now reaping the whirlwind.

Fox reports:

Trending: Twitter Explains Why It Hasn’t Yet Suspended President Trump’s Account

A Tennessee lawman who posted an Easter message and other religious-themed comments on Facebook said Tuesday he is ready for a legal showdown with an atheist group that accused him of violating the Constitution.

take our poll - story continues below

Has Adam Schiff committed fraud and treason concerning the Trump probe?

  • Has Adam Schiff committed fraud and treason concerning the Trump probe?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

American Atheists denounced both the message and the apparent scrubbing of comments critical of the Easter post and (Sheriff Eric Watson) Watson’s religious views. The group’s federal complaint charged that Watson’s religious post and subsequent deletion of critical comments “have caused and are causing immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage” to the plaintiffs.

One has to ask: if these posts were causing “immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage,” why then did she not simply stop following the posts? I mean, that seems simple enough. If something burns you, you do not continue to place your hand on it, do you?

No, in actuality, this woman wants to complain. She wants to play the victim. She wants to collect on this man’s attempt to live out his faith. But most of all, she is seeking to silence the sheriff.

She does not like the things that Sheriff Watson said, and she wants him to stop saying them. She apparently posted things contrary to the Sheriff’s beliefs to shame him into silence, but he simply took them down.

So this begs the question: why did she continue to go to the Facebook page? If these things were causing and still cause her damage, why look at them? The reason is simple: if she had stopped, she could not sue.

Article reposted with permission from Constitution.com

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.

You Might Like
Previous Global Strategist Warns: “There Is Insane Speculation… Investors Are Fleeing To Safety… A Lot Of Unknowns”
Next Albani’s Escape from Communism and His Free Life in America (Part I)

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.