Arkansas Muslim Inmate Wants To Wage Prison Jihad – Receive Religious Accommodation

A Muslim inmate in an ultra-maximum security prison in Arkansas is petitioning the Supreme Court to allow him to violate existing regulations for religious purposes and wear a full beard, CNN reports.

Abdul Maalik Muhammad complained in a handwritten petition to the Supreme Court that he is being forced to choose between his religion on the one hand, and prison punishment on the other. Corrections officials shot back that the basis for their refusal to accommodate Muhammad is a security threat.

For officials, growing and then shaving a beard can result in dramatic changes to appearance, which constitutes a clear security risk. Beards can also be used to hide weapons or contraband. The only facial hair currently allowed is a neatly trimmed mustache, with one exception under Administrative Directive 98-4.D. Beards can be worn only when diagnosed with a dermatological condition.

Trending: Fact Check: Yes, George Soros Was A Nazi Collaborator

The Obama administration has stepped in to lend its support to Muhammad, and this may be a decisive factor in the justices ruling in favor of accommodation, since the usual trend otherwise is to side with corrections officials.

take our poll - story continues below

Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?

  • Has There Been Voter Fraud in the 2020 Election?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“When Congress enacted RLUIPA, it made clear that courts should accord deference to prison administrators’ considered judgments about how to run safe and efficient prisons,” Obama administration lawyers told the court in a written brief. “Congress also made clear, however, that such deference is not due when a prison justifies a restriction based on exaggerated fears or mere speculation.” State leaders argued that they should be able to decide their own policies on the local level, and that a one size fits all requirement is a poor idea.

Muhammad is a Yemen-trained Muslim fundamentalist, who has already threatened to wage Jihad against those who contributed to his conviction. He is serving life in prison for slitting the throat of his ex-girlfriend, and in the past, he threatened to harm then-President George W. Bush’s two daughters.

Catholic bishops, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Anti-Defamation League are all piling on in support of Muhammad’s case. A ruling will be handed down in the coming few months.


Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

You Might Like
Previous Constitutional Sheriffs Who are Protecting Liberty
Next Federal Judge Upholds State's Right to Define Marriage as between a Man & Woman - But is that Enough?

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.

Sorry. No data so far.