For the past several weeks, there has been a lot of talk about the so-called “Black Lives Matter” protests, and how the protests seems to be growing in violence, with less and less being done to deal with them. President Obama, as expected, appears useless to stop the violence, even siding with the violence by his same refusal. There is a lot of talk about “racism,” “discrimination,” and the usual language. There are even calls for blacks to take over southern states, create their own country, and “kill all the white people”:
The end game is land ownership. The endgame is our own government in a nation within a nation. Okay. So we claim the states of Louisiana, we claim the states of Mississippi, we claim the states of South Carolina, we claim the states of Alabama, and we claim the states of Georgia.
We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states. If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So it’s not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country. (source)
This brings to mind something I learned a long time ago from the Russian communist literature. That is, the issue is never the issue, but the issue always is the revolution.
What revolution? By that, I mean what happened nearly a century ago in Russia, which is the rise of socialism and the destruction of the native cultures and peoples in the areas under socialist control. Through the consolidation of power into a small oligarcy accountable to nobody and with no checks on their power nor any morals to restrain them, these wealthy individuals will be able to act as demigods on earth, seizing and smashing whoever or whatever they will with the complicit assistance of a veritable slave army acting as prison guards in a state where all the citizens are treated as prisoners.
The Revolution in Russia of 1917 is an excellent template for understanding what will happen in and to the USA if socialists take over because, regardless of the name, it is the same disease. If they are successful, we can expect:
-The closing of churches or their nationalization, i.e., the church must preach “state approved” doctrine
-The mass murder of “undesirable people,” meaning possessing “abnormalities” that are either physical (retardation, etc.) or intellectual (anti-sodomy like Shoebat.com, etc.)
-The utter impoverishment of the 95% majority, with the 4% getting a “middle class wage” who are the “enforcers” (people who work for “the system”), and the 1% retaining all the rest of the wealth for themselves.
-The institution of internment camps (such as the GULAG, meaning “State Camps”), forced labor, and other punishments meted out summarily to people who are considered a “problem”
-The forced collectivization of agriculture, leading to the intentional starvation of millions, particularly in areas with large groups of people considered “undesirable”
-The establishment of a massive new category of “neomartyrs” (as the Orthodox call them) because anybody, especially a Christian, who stands up for the Faith will be made an example of
Each of these examples provided above has real-life roots in the events leading up to and more importantly, the consequences of the Revolution.
Enter into this “Black Lives Matter” (TM)(R).
Black Lives Matter is a group supposedly founded after the murder of the wannabe thug Trayvon Martin, whom President Obama said would be like his own son if he had one, at the hands of George Zimmerman, a Hispanic guard at a condominum complex where Martin was visiting. The case should have been open-and-shut, and with all respect to Zimmerman, if national attention were not given to this case, he probably would have been convicted of manslaughter. Likewise, Martin was a thug with a lengthy criminal history as a young man. However, since so called “black activists,” who, in reality are nothing more than pimps who make their living by prostituting black people to give or withhold support from certain causes, they made the issue into a “white versus black” issue, which it clearly was not, and the result of this was that Zimmerman walked free.
There are several people who talk about this online in the black community, but for the most part, it is an unspoken truth, which is not to be discussed, that black people in America are essentially owned by the Democratic party. As one well-known YouTube commentater, David Carroll (channels here and here), points out, “black people are slaves on the Democrat plantation.” This is a very interesting phenomenon because, as this same commentator points out, black people vote consistently >90+ Democrat in any election. Most of these same people claim to be some kind of Christian, and yet they consistently support a party which hates and wants to destroy the very same Bible which they say they love and believe in.
On the side of the Democratic party, which has been completely taken over by socialists, they do not care at all about black people – their culture, what they want, or the values they claim to espouse. What matters to them is solely the revolution. Therefore, it is in the interest of them to use whatever means are possible to achieve these ends. In the case of black America, it means winning their support so they do whatever they say without considering the consequences. The late President Lyndon B. Johnson put it well, for when he was asked about black America and the signing of the civil rights act, he said in response:
I’ll have those niggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years. (source)
Black Lives Matter is not the organic movement it presents itself to be. It was formed and is funded by several very large, wealthy, democrat donors, most famously George Soros himself, the man who is also behind the “refugee” invasion of Europe:
In November, members of Black Lives Matter (BLM) met behind closed doors with Democracy Alliance, a coterie of wealthy liberals who have pledged to fund leftist organizations.
The donor club was founded by former Clinton Treasury official Rob Stein.Members include the billionaire “philanthropist” George Soros, Taco Bell silver spoon baby Rob McKay, uber liberal Norman Lear, “meathead” Rob Reiner, co-founder of Tides Network Drummond Pike, SEIU boss Anna Burger (members of the union like to beat up opponents), and former Rockefeller Family Fund president Anne Bartley.
“The DA, as the club is known in Democratic circles, is recommending its donors step up check writing to a handful of endorsed groups that have supported the Black Lives Matter movement. And the club and some of its members also are considering ways to funnel support directly to scrappier local groups that have utilized confrontational tactics to inject their grievances into the political debate,” Politico reported.
In the news, some of you may have seen pictures of black people rioting and engaging in massive protests across the USA, and yet it appears that the police are doing nothing. They are most likely being ordered to stand down, as this is not the first time this has happened:
A union that represents 54 officers from the University of Illinois at Chicago Police Department is speaking out—arguing the chaotic Donald Trump rally on campus last week did not have to escalate to an extreme level of disorder and could have continued as planned.
The Metropolitan Association of Police Board Director, Ray Violetto, tells Fox News that UIC Police Chief, Kevin Booker, issued unusual stand-down orders including instructions that officers not bring pepper spray or wear dark gloves to the Trump rally—items the union officers say are basic and necessary equipment in any type of crowd control.
Violetto tells Fox News the UIC police were the agency in charge considering the Trump rally was on the school’s campus and that the officers were in charge of policing the inside of the arena.
It should be clear that if this was, say, a group of Christians protesting pro-sodomy laws by doing the same thing that these BLM protesters are doing, they would not be treated the same way. In fact, anybody who protests the government in such a way would never even get to this stage, as they would most likely be shot and bombed to death by FBI/DHS/Military police, and the survivors would be given mock trials and sent to prison for the remainder of their lives, such as what happened recently with the Oregon Wildlife Refugee standoff:
The rightwing occupation of an Oregon wildlife refuge unravelled after police arrested protest leader Ammon Bundy and four other key members of the anti-government militia.
On the 41st day of the standoff, the final four occupiers surrendered , and federal prosecutors announced that they had filed felony charges against a total of 25 people associated with the armed occupation of the Malheur national wildlife refuge.
The group of 23 men and two women – who are all facing the same federal charge of conspiracy to impede officers through “ force, intimidation and threats ” – hail from ten states across the US and have a wide range of prior involvement in conservative activism and criminal activity.
This entire Black Lives Protest nonsense is being permitted. However, many of the people participating in these protests surely do not feel this way. They really believe the talk about a “race war” and “kill all white people.” The Communists of Russia had a term for these people, who were true believers in the surface cause, yet did not or could not recognize the underlying end for which they were championing. The term was “полезные дураки”- “useful idiots.”
Stop and think about this for a minute: do you really think that a “race war” with blacks attacking whites would actually stand a chance, especially since black people constitute scarcely 10% of the American population (or 13% when accounting for mixed-race persons)? The black population is also in decline, due to abortion rates, especially considering that whites make up at least 62% of the population, and if one includes Hispanic persons, that number jumps to 77%. It would be a veritable bloodbath – on behalf of the black population, that is. If that is so, then encouraging such an idea is either (a) incredibly stupid, or (b) intended to create a conflict with a greater purpose, which is the introduction of the government into the “conflict” so they can claim control.
For years, it had been an open secret that the white power movement was actually heavily infiltrated by the FBI and now the DHS, so much so that one might argue that most of the “white nationalist” activity was actually done by the government in order to manipulate public opinion. This was formally exposed in the mainstream media when Hal Turner, a well-known name in white nationalist circles, admitted under oath during a trial for threatening public officials that he had been on the payroll of the FBI for many years, and indeed, he was in fact paid by the FBI to make some of the threats that he did.
The Hal Turner example is to the “white nationalist” movement is what BLM is to the “black nationalist” movement, in that both incidents show how these people and groups are not “organic” movements at all, but manufactured with the sole intention of manipulating public opinion to promote the policies of the socialists. It also should not surprise people that both of these groups would be funded, because again as history has shown, many times socialists, bankers, or men with evil designs for power will fund both sides of a conflict, in order to ensure control over whoever wins, as well as the enslavement of the loser. The Battle of Waterloo was a famous example of this, where the infamous banker Nathan Rothschild funded both the British and French sides, and not only this, but he lied that the French won in order to drive down the price of English stock and buy it up for very, very little, when indeed the British won. This caused the shareholders to lose most of their money, and the Rothschilds made a fortune, which they have used ever since.
Think about the massive promotion in recent years of not just pro-black, but particularly interracial relationships, even to the outright detriment and mocking of white Americans. With the relentless “anti-racism” propaganda promoted in the schools, media, and society, one would think that race relations would be at an all-time high, and in a sense, they are. However, the reason for promoting complete racial miscegenation is the same reason for promoting race war: it is not really about either view, but it is about the revolution by dividing people based on race and identity, creating a conflict, then stepping in to resolve that conflict.
It is also interesting that this “race conflict” comes at a time when there is the next presidental election coming up, and Hillary Clinton, who, along with Bill Clinton, has extensive ties to the same poor people and groups who exploit black Americans through these groups, faces a serious challenge in winning the election in November at the hands of Donald Trump. People love Donald Trump because he has been saying what Americans have been thinking about for years. He has been uniting people – White and Black, liberal and conservative, and so forth. He is truly, as much as one can be in our society, a “people’s candidate” and a real challenge to the establishment in power in Washington, as well as to the foreign interests whom the Clintons and their cohorts work for.
The American socialists want a race war because they know they cannot win honestly, and they may not even be able to cheat this year’s election to win. Think of this race nonsense as a “backup plan”- who knows? If Clinton stands a serious chance of losing, maybe there will suddenly be a “race war” that the government will have to “suspend the elections” for, and President Obama, being the “honest” leader he is, will just have to “appoint a temporary successor,” in the person of Hillary Clinton.
I am not saying this will or will not happen. However, the socialist beast is being cornered right now, and it will stop at nothing to attain its goals of a total anti-God, anti-Christian revolution across America, and it will use any means to accomplish this. Don’t put anything past them, and most of all, don’t take the bait, because this entire race canard is just that: the bait for a trap.
Article reposted with permission from Shoebat.com
*Article by Andrew BieszadDon't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.