9th Circuit Court Flagrantly Abuses Authority: Blocks Trump Travel Ban


Judicial activism. Liberal judges have lost sight of who they are and what they do. Their job is to enforce the law, not make law.

The notorious left-wing federal appeals court Thursday refused to let President Trump reinstitute a temporary ban on travelers from seven majority-Muslim nations, ruling that the president’s order violates the due process rights of people affected by the ban.

The quick decision from a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit could lead to a showdown at the Supreme Court, unless the administration agrees to dial back the travel ban or try its case before a federal judge in Seattle who ordered it stopped last week.

Trending: Duck Duck Go’s far-left political donations and abuse of user data have users FUMING

Many Presidents have issued travel restrictions in the past, mostly Democrat presidents, neither the media or the judicial branch challenged it. Carter was not challenged, nor Obama. When President Obama announced we would no longer take Cuban refugees, no one said a word.

take our poll - story continues below

Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?(2)

  • Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Freedom Outpost updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

The left is at war against us, we the people. We have two words for President Trump — keep fighting. We have your back.

APPEALS COURT KEEPS U.S. DOORS OPEN DURING IMMIGRATION FIGHT

Bloomberg, February 9, 2017:

The San Francisco-based appeals court on Thursday spurned the government’s request to close the doors after days of public debate over President Donald Trump’s attacks on the judicial system and a rush of fearful immigrants. The ruling increases the likelihood that the administration will ask the Supreme Court to step into a case that’s the biggest test of Trump’s executive power yet.

The public “has an interest in free flow of travel, in avoiding separation of families, and in freedom from discrimination,” a three-judge panel said in a unanimous 29-page ruling.

The panel’s ruling in favor of immigrants is a victory not only for Washington and Minnesota — the states that sued — but for Facebook Inc., Google Inc. and Microsoft Corp., which said in court papers that the measure would hinder their global businesses.

Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller

Pamela Geller’s commitment to freedom from jihad and Shariah shines forth in her books

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Twitter, and follow our friends at RepublicanLegion.com.

Become an insider!

Sign up for the free Freedom Outpost email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Previous Fiat Slavery In Action: Dow 20,000 + Debt $20,000,000,000,000
Next Archbishop to Anti-Trump Protesters: "Where Were You When Muslim Terrorists Were Slaughtering And Persecuting Christians?"

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon to the right of the comment, and report it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation. If you don't see a commenting section below, please disable your adblocker.

Sorry. No data so far.