Twitter has been outed as being nothing more than an arm of the Socialist agenda in actually meddling in this year's mid-term elections. They have done so by basically silencing the voices of their opposition, and in the latest move by the social media giant, they banned ten conservative voices on Twitter and failed to provide a reason for the ban. To top it off, their pre-canned reply to an appeal issued a permanent ban.
Jeff Dunetz at LidBlog provides the account:
Eight of the accounts booted by twitter were connected to websites; two were personal accounts:
Twitter Account: Owner
- @Army4OurRepub: GreatAmericanRepublic.com
- @theEagleiRising: EagleRising.com
- @flagandC: FlagandCross.com
- @RedrightRepub: SteadfastHerald.com
- @GreatAmRepub: AllenWestRepublic.com
- @constitutionNat: Constitution.com
- @luvGodnCountry: Personal Account For Tanya Grimsley
- @bb4SP: BB4SP.com
- @deplorableNews : DeplorableNews.com
- @ BarracudaMama: Personal Account For Alicia Luke
The first seven of the accounts above had never received any warning or punishment by twitter. The bottom three were suspended about six years ago but never received any warning that they were close to being in trouble.
The suspension notices were sent to their owner’s emails at the same time., Below is one example:
Read the email carefully, do you notice that after the support team email says “Specifically, for” there is a blanks space?
In other words, they were suspended for violating Twitter rules but apparently, which particular rules are not for their consumption. Perhaps those roles are kept a safe with the formula for Coca-Cola, and Col. Sanders chicken recipe.
None of the accounts or the websites are particularly controversial. Perhaps Twitter wouldn’t tell them why they were banned because the only Twitter rule violated was breathing oxygen while conservative.
But still, these ten accounts soldiered on; they contacted Twitter support to ask why and appeal their suspension. The below is an example of Twitter support’s response:
Translating their response into English, “We’re not going to tell you and because you asked you are permanently banned.”
The email from the bluebirds of punishment says “repeat violations.” How can they expect people not to repeat violations if they weren’t told what the violations were in the first place?
Here’s the real truth, they didn’t have time to repeat. The person who owns @luvGodnCountry told me that as soon as she received the suspension notice, she appealed. Precisely four seconds after she filled out the form below and sent it to Twitter the second notice appeared telling her that she was forever banned.
This really should come as no surprise from the likes of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. After all, Twitter has not only silenced the likes of Alex Jones in concert with Facebook, YouTube, Google and Apple but has recently cut off actor James Woods for a harmless meme.
By the way, though Congress claims they want to get involved, many members, including Republicans run interference for those doing the censorship. This is why going to Congress will not end up being in our best interest.
In a report back in April, Mac Slavo wrote:
Applauded by Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, liberals have devised a plan they think will destroy normal Americans in a new “Civil War.” But here’s the spoiler alert: it’s isn’t really that good of a plan, to begin with.
San Francisco-based social media platform Twitter isn’t known for their unbiased approach to social media.
Now, the CEO applauded an article in something called Medium in which the writer of said article described how liberals intend to crush Normal Americans into serfdom in a bloodless “civil war.”
The goal of the “war” will be to turn the entire United States into California by offering up a supermajority of liberals in political power. Because that’s working out so well in California: homelessness is spiking uncontrollably, the tax burden is forcing people to leave, regulations are shutting businesses, housing costs have soared to unbearable levels, and few have basic human rights there unless they pay the government for permission.
Dorsey also has said, "We do not look at content with regards to political viewpoint or ideology. I think we need to constantly show that we are not adding our own bias, which I fully admit is left, is more left-leaning."
"We do not look at content with regards to political viewpoint or ideology," @Jack told me. But he knows some people do not believe him. "I think we need to constantly show that we are not adding our own bias, which I fully admit is left, is more left-leaning," he says... pic.twitter.com/1i8jJunhfz
— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) August 18, 2018
He's lying and anyone paying attention knows it.
The only way to deal with these people is not to write more articles or start new websites, though that is encouraged. The way to deal with them is to actually demand justice in the matter and bring the law to bear on them, especially outlets like Google that were started up with American tax dollars via a CIA front group.Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.