I was not aware that there are different types of voters. All this time, I thought there was just one. In one respect, I guess, I'm correct. If you're a Republican, or certainly a conservative, there is only one. However, Democrats, you see, have more options.

A Democrat can be a standard off-the-rack voter—or he or she may be an illegal alien voter. A Democrat can be a multiple voter, casting several ballots – he or she can be a multistate voter or a multiple mail-in voter. The options seem endless. It's a great time to be a sleazy Democrat.

But now, according to MoveOn.org, Democrats can be "Supervoters"! (no link – it was an email blast.)

Unfortunately this moniker is only reserved for women.

Isn't that sexist, you may ask? Of course not. Don't be silly. Sexism, like racism is a one-way street. Just as "minorities" can't be racist, women can't be sexist. Come on, conservatives – try to keep up.

Anyway, Anna Galland, the head harpy at MoveOn.org, says, "Women across the country do amazing and powerful things every day, but we have a special superpower right now: Our votes."

She asks rhetorically: "Why are we so powerful now? Why are we Supervoters?"

She then explains that everyone wants them (trust me Anna – no one wants you). Both Republicans and Democrats are trying to lock up the female vote – because, you know – the female vote is so much different than the male. She says that Senate candidates in particular are trying to "woo" women.

Galland cheerfully exclaims: "Lucky for us, women tend to be more progressive than men." Yes, it's those evil Republican men that have made it so difficult for women all these years.

And just what have the Republicans done? Well, Anna ticks off a whole laundry list of complaints. Oh, I'm sorry. Was that sexist to mention women and laundry in the same sentence? More than likely.

Evidently, Republicans have slashed education funding, closed abortion clinics, and given control of contraceptives to the women's employers. Wow – Republicans sure must hate women.

Galland claims that, "We understand that putting some of these guys in power is like giving our most misogynist, anti-choice, creepy uncle a leading role in deciding how we and our families should live our lives. No thanks!"

I wonder if she hates all males or just Republican men? My guess is that she is fine with the sniveling metrosexual weenie liberal men who ask "how high?" when she says "jump."

She continues with a litany of liberal issues that will somehow all be in jeopardy if Republicans take the Senate. Issues like abortion and contraception, of course – illegal immigration – education funding and social services.

According to Galland, these are the only issues women care about. Evidently they don't care about jobs. Women are apathetic over the pitiful economy – the deficit and debt. Apparently they don't care about staggeringly higher Obamacare premiums or reduced medical coverage. I guess they don't care about Ebola or terrorism. They apparently don't mind that the price of everything is going up, save for a temporary reprieve of the price of gas.

These "Supervoters" are not supposed to be concerned that their own children are falling ill to a strange respiratory disease sweeping the nation that just happens to coincide with the massive influx of illegals. I guess as long as they have their condoms and abortion on demand, the whole world can melt down around them.

If I were a woman, I would be insulted by someone or some organization who thinks I'm just that stupid. This post is an insult to all intelligent women—but, of course, that's not who she's appealing to, is it?

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.