Unbeknownst to the vast majority of Americans who go about their lives in a zombified state existing somewhere between clueless and misinformed, as the 2016 election draws closer with each day, definitive lines are being drawn in the sand. Assuming we have an election at all, once the election has concluded, you can expect one side or the other to commence trampling the line the other drew as quickly as possible, which I fear is is going to result in a tremendous amount of violence, and I am far from alone in that assessment.
Here in the United States, the 2016 election will determine whether the United States remains a republic, with even a fraction of the rights our Founders envisioned for us, or will the United States fall to socialism, and transform into absolute despotic police state. All that assumes of course, that the county doesn’t find itself engulfed in a second civil war before, during, or after the election, which is not out of reach by any means. You can be sure there is a reason I've covered topics like how over 1,500 pages of new documents have been discovered revealing the federal government's Martial Law and FEMA Camp agenda, as well as how the U.N. says that soon they will occupy America, and they’ll be “going door-to-door taking guns…" None of these stories occur in a vacuum.
The subject of the article below by Rick Wells, is a speech Obama gave this past week dealing with government censorship of speech. Just outside the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Obama made the case for government censorship, and naturally he did so based on complete lies. Go figure!?! Of course Obama didn’t refer to his idea as "censorship," instead he referred to it as the “rebuilding of the wild-wild-west-of-information flow.” What an ass. He made the case that information should be required to pass “basic truthfulness tests.” The question is, who decides what’s true?
I say Obama is a raging sociopath, and the biggest ass**** to ever occupy the White House. Truth doesn’t get any more pure than that as far as I'm concerned, however somehow I don’t think I’d pass Obama’s government mandated “truth test." Let there be no doubt, in the times we live in, tyranny's weapon of choice against its greatest enemy, liberty, has proven to be “political correctness.” There is an enormous movement afoot not just here at home domestically, but also in Europe by all the major American social media giants to stomp out what they are calling “hate speech,” or "alternative narratives." Alternative narratives? Is that another way of saying differing opinions?
How exactly is “Hate Speech” defined anyway? That which does not conform with liberal ideology. Period.
When a lot of this news first broke in Europe (and our media ignored of course), I published theactual European statute that has the power to send anyone guilty of spreading “hate speech,” or “conspiracy theory” online to “re-education camps.” Yes, you read that right. "Re-education camps" in Europe for not thinking a certain way…. not like that's ever led to problems before, right?
On May 31st, 2016, the European Commission formalized their full assault on free speech in Europe with a major decision that was announced side-by-side with American tech giants including Google, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, and Microsoft. In the press release, the partnership announced what they called a "code of conduct" regarding "illegal online hate speech." The new "code of conduct" requires preventive measures to be taken within 24 hours of anything deemed "hate speech" online including but not limited to: including racism, xenophobia, and/or any posts related to the matter.
In the video below, I go beyond the recent Obama speech reviewed below by Rick Wells, and I discuss an overall trend taking place here in America toward what our friends overseas in the European Parliament are already referring to as a shift that is Orwellian in nature. They warn that the move will effectively see alternative media die, and free speech die along with it. Americans need to wake up, because even though many Americans may not realize it, the very same policies are already taking root here in the United States, but they are well hidden.
For example, Net Neutrality is anything but neutral, and the TPP actually has hidden clauses within it that prevent free speech online, hence why Obama is so gung-ho for it. Might I suggest reading, 10 Reasons Why You Should Oppose TPP and TTIP, and The TPP Has a Secret Clause to Limit Free Speech Online – Shocked?
European Parliament Member Janice Atkinson told Breitbart London, “The Commission has been itching to shut down free speech in the Parliament and now they’re attacking social media. We have already seen Facebook ‘policing’ so-called right-wing postings. Sound familiar? As a conservative writer here in the U.S., a country where we allegedly still have freedom of speech, I can assure you we DO NOT! If I had a dollar for every time I’ve been censored, I could retire by now.
In the video below, I will also discuss how this rapid move to embrace censorship is shaping the 2016 election, and what all of it could very likely mean for the future not just of free speech here in America, but life as we know it. Following my video, Rick Wells shreds Obama's thinly veiled threats in his analysis. I also include a video of Obama from a recent post titled, George Soros' Master Blueprint to Conquer the West Caught on Camera, just to show how these ideas are playing with fire.
One might argue that when a leader, one that still has not proven who he is, of the United States can publicly call for an end of free speech and the First Amendment, on US soil, our nation is lost. That is made increasingly more likely when the free press, the one that doesn’t report on the treasonous comments, is completely owned by the federal criminals. That is the case in the United States and those are the events that took place this week in Pittsburgh, PA.
Obama came to town, bragging on how technology, presumably all thanks to his greatness and superior leadership as the pretend ‘president.’ He said, “There’s a reason that US Steel Tower is now also the corporate home of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.” He doesn’t say it’s because globalist policies and EPA restrictions have killed America’s steel industry, he pretends technological growth simply outpaced it. Obama lies, that’s what he does.
He went further to advocate for the abolishment of the First Amendment, though not in such a direct manner as to create concerns among the sleeping American people. He adopted some clever language that would label what he have now, a more or less free, open and constitutional environment for the exchange of ideas as dangerous and irresponsible. He labeled what we have now as the “wild wild west” and inferred that America needs a new sheriff to come in and bring order to the chaos. Our illegitimate dictator equated freedom with lawlessness.
He called for censorship, what he described as curation because it sounds less threatening and is more familiar and appealing to his audience’s “high tech ears.” Obama referenced the “good old days” before we had the Internet, which America actually no longer has, a result of one of his most recent acts of treason. If only all of those Republicans and constitutionalists weren’t getting in the way of his propaganda with their insane ideas about liberty, nationalism and traditional American values, he’d have his global government already in place.
Obama depicted the days of the three networks which we all foolishly believed were honest and objective as an improvement over the current free-exchange that takes place online. That’s the type of thinking one would expect from a third world despot like him. It’s also why he engineered the giveaway of our Internet to his global cronies. He is now able to completely circumvent the US Constitution, removing the First Amendment as an obstruction to his plotting and a threat of exposure.
The bias of the article, supposedly published by a “credible news source” that would receive Obama’s approval following a censor’s review, AFP, illustrates and helps make the case against the load of crap he’s selling. In the article those with views exposing the crimes of his regime are labeled conspiracy theorists that need to be muted because they destroy a supposed “common basis for debate.” The current debate is beyond the narrow scope that the global masters are willing to permit.
Obama told those gathered for the White House Frontiers Conference at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburg, “We are going to have to rebuild within this wild-wild-west-of-information flow some sort of curating function that people agree to.” What he’s advocating is censorship that enough people agree to initially to get passed, a program that will then become ever-more restrictive until free speech no longer exists.
You would think these “geniuses” he’s addressing would be smart enough to figure out they’re being flimflammed into slavery, but they’re not. They are suck up academics who refuse to entertain the concept that their government isn’t their friend, there to help them and always will be.
Dictator Obama said, “There has to be, I think, some sort of way in which we can sort through information that passes some basic truthiness tests and those that we have to discard, because they just don’t have any basis in anything that’s actually happening in the world.” Those would be anything that exposes what he’s doing, like the global warming hoax, the world government, the crimes of him and his former Secretary of State, violations of the Constitution as he did with his amnesty declaration and much more. They’re the sort of things that our Congress would be protecting us from, if they hadn’t already been corrupted as well.
Continuing to make the case that the outlets he would approve are the Marxist ones, AFP made statements that Donald Trump repeats ideas and hired staff members “from right-wing media outlets,” as if there is only one viewpoint of merit, the Marxist one. They also defended Obama for refusing to provide any background documentation and his fraudulent misrepresentation of himself as an American citizen.
To get some idea of just dangerous a concept Obama's "truth police" is, or a "speech police," when we clearly have First Amendment jurisprudence to handle any matters that arise, consider the following recorded speech where Obama mocks Trump openly for suggesting that the election could be possibly rigged.
At the time of the speech, Obama knew that every word he was saying was a lie, but what he did not know, was that later that day and the next, videos would surface from a one-year undercover sting operation proving the Democrats have been engaged in massive voter fraud on a level far worse than almost any of us could have imagined. Does Obama's "truth police" get to lock him up and throw away the key too? I didn't think so.
This story is as old as time. The governed are becoming too smart for those governing, which is precisely what those governing seek to prevent. The smarter we become using truth as a weapon, the faster we need to be silenced. The problem is not unique to the U.S. either obviously, as evidenced by the clamp down in Europe by American CEO's no less. What the elite fail to realize, is that matters are reaching a tipping point.
Arguing in a sentence that seems to be missing one or two key words, the Marxist AFP, Agence France Presse, stated, the problem was that “for much of that time, Republicans and Democrats — which their own media sources — could rarely agree on even the most basic facts to build a debate.” The natural solution for a dictator like Obama is to remove the opposing side of that debate, the Constitution lovers’ side.
He said, “That is hard to do, but I think it’s going to be necessary, it’s going to be possible.” If his plans to take over America are to succeed, he’s going to have to shut down the voices of freedom. From his perspective, it’s necessary.
In building his false premise and the lie that he’s not stifling speech, Obama said, “The answer is obviously not censorship, but it’s creating places where people can say ‘this is reliable’ and I’m still able to argue safely about facts and what we should do about it.”
It is censorship, he’s merely claiming it is not. The mechanism for its imposition is already in the works. A syndicate of major social media sites and left-wing media outlets, including the AFP that was the source for this information, has already organized. The censorship cabal includes, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, The New York Times, Washington Post, BuzzFeed News, CNN, ABC News of Australia, ProPublica, AFP, The Telegraph, France Info, Breaking News, Le Monde’s Les Decodeurs, International Business Times UK, Eurovision News Exchange and Al Jazeera Media Network.
Obama isn’t talking like a guy who’s leaving office. Either he plans to stick around, he’s confident his proxy will carry on in his name, or he’s got another position of power that is being prepared for him to continue his attacks on America. The problem of Hussein Obama and the global fascists is not going away automatically with a Donald Trump victory on January 20th. Of course, it would be harder for him to operate from inside a federal prison.
Article posted with permission from The Last Great StandDon't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.