In our last article, we had stopped at the first President to use “executive privilege” to shield His Attorney General, something no other President would consider if they had nothing to hide! But we must move on to the rest of the 42 or so First time ANY president has done anything like this in our nation, it was done under Adolf Hitler, the Italian Dictator, Castro, Chavez in Venezuela, and other dictators from around the world, but never by any President truly representing the very people he is supposed to be helping and is rather making a very bold attempt to destroy with the “Hollywood” smile and misleading facts and figures. Enough about the man known as Barry Sotoero, Barack Hussein Obama, or whatever his true name is, let us continue on about what Obama has done that no other President in the history of the United States has done.

Obama is the first President to issue unlawful recess-appointments over a long Weekend, while the United States Senate remained in session (against the advice of his own Justice Department. Remember, this is the same Justice Department that Obama issued executive privilege to protect]

The reason Obama did this was because the people he appointed did not meet the requirements of the office he appointed them to. We must remember that Obama has always considered the very Constitution he swore an Oath to uphold as a hindrance to him to get what he wanted done, not what by law Congress had the power alone to do.

Obama is the first President to fire an Inspector General of Americorps for catching one of His (Obama’s) friends in a corruption case.

Now this just does not seem to be right. After all, it was one of Obama’s speeches that he would control and not put up with any sort of corruption, but here again, Obama makes a huge step up and fires the Inspector General for not just finding corruption, but because the individual who was caught being corrupt is Obama’s friend. What does that say about our President, a man whom stated he would end corruption in Washington, D.C. and he would be totally open? It says that Obama does not speak the truth no matter how much he smiles and says it is true, it is a bald-face lie! Obama had stated that his administration would be the best in ending corruption and be the best in being open. Yet when he got into office he did the exact opposite of what he said on the campaign trail. We all must remember to read between the lines of what Obama states and then look at what he says and does because what he says he will do and what he does do are complete opposites nearly all the time. Obama is like having the devil himself in the White House smiling and telling the nation one thing then closing the door and doing the exact opposite. We as a people must observe this or our nation will be destroyed before our eyes and those people with the least to lose will lose everything and those with the most to lose will lose it all. No one will be on top unless Obama gives them permission to be there. This is a typical Socialist/Communist ideology.

Obama has violated the law itself with his next "first". Obama is the first President ever to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportations of illegal immigrants across the US, including those with criminal convictions.

This is the first time that any President has violated the written law to order a “Secret Amnesty Program’ and in doing so he not just violated the law, but he also circumvented Congress while doing it. We must remember that Congress is so corrupt now that it will allow President Obama to not just violate the law, but the Constitution itself!

We asked Representative Steve Scalise from Louisiana why no action was taken when Obama has violated the law and it is very clear that it was done. Representative Steve Scalise had nothing at all to say about this and gave no answer whatever, this is the type of people we have in Congress, the only thing they wish to do is collect their pay check and go home. It is because of the lack of true action in the entire Congress that our nation is in the position it is in.

Most Representatives will quickly state, “We are just one and if we bring up any questions, we cannot get the votes needed to pass our suggestions, so why do it?” We have seen this time and time again, but when the President has violated the very law the Congress has sworn to uphold why sit back and allow such action to continue? Does this not just encourage Obama to just forget about the House of Representatives and the Senate and just go and write Executive Orders without regard to the Constitution or Congress? If we look at these "firsts" by Obama, it becomes very clear that Congress is just sitting back allowing Obama to do what he wishes. If that is the case, we as a nation should vote them all out or do as so stated in Declaration of Independence and to "throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security." Then we start with a brand new bunch that will only be paid for time spent on the floor of Congress and they will have to pay into all the benefits just like everyone else. But we are a nation of dunces! We may well be on the way to a dictatorship, led by Barack Obama and his Islamic friends! Only time will tell and I pray to God each day that this will not happen.

Barack Obama was the first President to Sue states for enforcing voter ID requirements, which were previously ruled legal by the U.S. Supreme Court.

This should be the most shocking of all, especially since the Supreme Court upheld this prior to Obama assuming office. One has to wonder why even claim that voter ID is bad? When a group of politicians, like those who have now taken over the Democrat party, it becomes very apparent that this party which had once been the flag wavers of freedom have now become the flag wavers of Socialism/Communism. This can be seen by just looking at the number of Representatives in the House of Representatives who now proudly display their membership in the socialist Democrat party. Why oppose a voter ID? Is it not right to ensure those voting are whom they lay claim to be? But under the Obama ideology, it is better not to have a voter ID so that Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck can vote in more than one place yet again. Should this just be left alone, especially since the Supreme Court of the nation has stated it is legal? Not if the people filing the suit have other plans which incorporate ideas of using fictitious voters all over to build up a solid vote in their favor. This is corruption at the highest levels and Obama is the head man in charge of getting the vote out, even if it means doing away with an otherwise perfectly legal way to ensure a clean and right action for the voters and to be sure that no fraud was made. Under the Obama rule, such regulations cannot be allowed to be in place. In states that have the voter ID law, very little fraud is committed and it is usually caught quickly due to the ID law. To do away with a law, that is a State's rights issue and has been upheld by the Supreme Court, just makes one wonder why do it, unless the desire to cheat and manipulate the vote was not the goal.

Obama, by backing off of clear and obvious voter intimidation at the polls, becomes the first President to allow voter intimidation that was not just an idea, but caught on video! According to Investors Business Daily he becomes the “first President to encourage racial discrimination and intimidation at polling places.”

How proud does Obama feel after laying claim to the title of being the first President to “Encourage Racial Discrimination?” This does, in fact, follow his ideology from his teachings at Occidental College, where he learned the ideas of Marxism while going to meetings where a huge picture of Karl Marx was displayed as he sat down and enjoyed the teaching of Marxist ideology! That is no surprise given the fact that Obama was taught the ideas of Karl Marx while he was 18 or so. This also goes back to his mentor and advisor for eight years before, the Communist Frank Marshall Davis. Both men honed the ideology of Socialism, Marxism, and Communism into his thoughts, so much so, that in 1981 he had talked to John Drew about the revolution that must come to the United States so that his Marxists ideology will be able to flourish! Yes, that is Barack Hussein Obama. It would not be a surprise that if any of the founding Fathers could be here today, they would take up arms against this man and take the Constitution back to its full glory!

Obama is-the first President to refuse to comply With a House Oversight Committee subpoena.

Why has President Obama done this? Didn't he make a statement during his run for the White House in 2008 that he would have the most open administration ever? Yet it looks like Obama has once again lied to the very people that voted him into office! His refusal to comply with a subpoena would almost be on the verge of being a violation of the very Constitution Obama swore to uphold! But we as a nation still, for some unknown reason, believe that Obama has and will do right. If we just look at what is presented here so far, it is very clear that Obama has an agenda that does NOT conform to the Constitution nor to those whom think the most of him!

Obama is also the first President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.

This alone shows the want of Obama to be the Dictator, not the President. When he makes such a declaration is way out of line with the law and Constitution! Why did he make such a declaration? It is because he does not like the restrictions of the Constitution. It is a direct attack upon the very Constitution that Obama swore under oath to uphold and here he destroys the very principal of his office by making a declaration that cannot be held as law abiding at all! It is in fact a null and void act since it is in conflict with the very law as it is written and under the Constitution. What Obama has declared cannot be upheld in a court of law, nor by the Constitution. Remember the Constitution is what he has such difficulty with.

Obama is the first President to demand a company hand over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.

This direct influence by Obama into a matter of which should have gone through Congress shows that Obama has no interest in, nor worry about, the violation of the Constitution or of the people it was written to protect! All these firsts and yet none of them have really helped anyone but those that put money into the Obama for President campaign! Is it just so simple or is there another much broader reason for all these "firsts" as a President?

Barack Hussein Obama is the first President ever to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.

Obama had a law signed without him being there? This is very troubling because if he is out on the golf course or at a party and a law he knows nothing about needs to be signed, then all they have to do is get the okay from Obama and the law is “automatically” signed without Obama being anywhere near the paper work! Let us take a look at this in a way that may open some eyes, though very few that still support this mad man. Suppose just for the sake of doing this that Congress becomes totally Democrat led again. They decide to make a law banning the First and Second Amendment. Then they send the law to be signed to Obama, who at the time is either playing golf or at a party. It gets signed by this “auto-pen” and thus becomes law. The next morning we wake up to a new United Socialist States of America signed into law by Obama through his “auto-pen” without his even reading it. Now how would all of the Obama followers feel if they woke up to such a condition due to their lack of information by the news media that was bought and paid for by the Chicago style corrupt administration? We are very sure that no one would ever want to see this, but it could well happen under this very same type of control that Obama has set up. It is scary and should be very scary since like all of these "firsts," no other President has done this due to the constraints of the Constitution. With Obama, as he stated more than once, the Constitution is a road block for what he wants to do and that can be seen by his actions shown here.

It is here that a Nazi commander used words that seem to reflect what Obama is doing during this term in office. Obama going out nearly on a daily basis and making statements that what Romney says is either a lie or false. Obama uses what has been used in the past by more demeaning people and as one of the Nazi Germans stated,

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

- Joseph Goebbels, Minister of Nazi Propaganda

Is Obama using this tactic to be re-elected as President again? It appears he is.

It is your decision to make as an individual and this is where the rubber meets the road because this nation was founded under the idea that it is run by “we the people” and not “we the government."

Editor's note: This is part two in a series. Read Part One here. Read Part Three here. Read Part Four.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.