The West, in its era under Christianity, has not known the phenomenon we call the homosexual movement until the 20th century. During the Christian era, whenever homosexuality was discussed, it was almost always considered an aberration imported from the Muslim orient—which there, it was always considered not just an acceptable practice but a norm and is why homosexuals tend to be more sympathetic towards Islam over Christianity.
The proof to this is simple. All one has to do in order to understand Islamic history is to review ISIS and they will see is a microcosm of the times of Muhammad and his companions, Khalid, Ali, Omar, Abu Bakr including all the Muslim dynasties after them … ghosts from a dark history past who miraculously were released from the depths of the pit into your social media network and youtube, all with the original mascara eyes men, red dye henna beards, long hair like women (Revelation 9:8), dress, sexual habits including all the depraved strange preferences, and unimaginable brutality.
What the western analyst fails to consider is that the Muslim world underwent a period of westernization in which the British Empire slowly rid us the sickness of Sate in India, child brides throughout the Muslim world and to somewhat set up laws which collided with Shariah but failing to completely obliterate it.
Detractors argue over ISIS, and we argue back, asking, "How can these small band of Muslim terrorists transform a society in Syria and Iraq into a living hell?" They counter saying that ISIS is an unusual phenomenon which is different from the traditional Muslim culture, and we ask, "Since after the dismantlement of the Ottomans, was there anything that existed even close to a Muslim culture?" In Egypt where the hub of Muslim civilization thrived there thrived British arts which covered its ruins and today we still have fifty percent of the 'Muslims' in Egypt are the Muslim 'protestants' fighting to keeping it that way and is why these insist that they alongside the Copt worship the same God concocting yet a new Islam which has never existed.
ISIS has a religion—In fact, the purest form of Islam: Islam itself. Islam is ISIS and ISIS is Islam in its purest form. Our critics will argue, how so, especially since ISIS's understanding of Islam has been debunked a thousand times over by major Muslim theologians worldwide. They always exclaim 'How dare you?'
We dare, for even daring to go against the tide is a western phenomenon not Muslim. The ISIS phenomenon is Islam itself which simply was catapulted from the time tunnel of history to reveal its original reality. Islam throughout history has always transferred any region it occupied into a land of corruption, sodomites, and degenerates while Christianity transferred the entire Middle East after the Ottomans into a land of milk and honey.
One honest expose argued on how Islam is the religion of sodomites was written by Muslim Saudi writer Dr. Zuhair Mohammed Jamil Kutby who laments (I translated from Arabic): "The Arab Nation and through its scholars, jurists and intellectuals, think of the Muslim world as one of the best nations. They say it is a nation like no other in the universe. But the fact is that it went through periods of physical and moral degeneration that even history is embarrassed of."
"When we come back to read some pages of our history—not the history written by the western orientalist lest we claim they are antagonistic. We find that our Arab history is full of conflict, crowded with a culture of lying and exposed by sexual and moral deviation … is it not considered wrong and shameful the spread of corruption and sexual deviation in the corridors and palaces during [Muslim] Arab rule?"
Kutby was not discussing some odd ruler or some aberrant phenomenon, no, he was discussing the highest pride of Muslim history rulers: "Plentiful were these [deviations] written in our history books, novels and stories. For example, The Abbasid Caliph Harun al-Rashid spent his nights with a boy named Al-Majin and the immoral poet Abu Nawas…Here are the verses that indicate sexual decadence and corruption in which Abu Nawas says 'Adela blames my choice, a boy smooth as an Oryx …leave me alone, I said, do not blame me, I am committed to what you hate and until death do us part. Did not the book of Allah instruct? To prefer boys over girls…'"
And if one thinks what future lays for the West with its promotion of homosexuality in the military, they need to look no further than the Muslim history to see the results. Throughout Muslim history, Muslim sultans were very fond of handsome young slaves whom they kept close to their persons as pages, service-boys, bodyguards, special troops, and as gay companions. Infatuation for such slaves was a bane of the life of Muslim royalty and nobility in particular, although they considered it to be a fashion. In fact, the whole of the Muslim armies and system was a gay tryst.
Almost all of the Muslim caliphates beginning with the Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Córdoba Spain, Fatimid all the way down to the Ottomans, from the highest leaders to the lowest of low they indulged in ghilman (boy love).
Under the Khilji Dynasty (1290-1320) Sultan Alauddin Khilji sodomized his most beloved soldier Malik Kafur, a slave boy from Gujarat after he "was castrated, converted to Islam, and was taken into Alauddin's service." Vincent Smith describes for example Sultan Khilji's "addiction to disgusting vice." Kafur ended up murdering Khilji the Sultan taking over the dynasty to only end up beheaded and taken over by Khilji's son Qutb-uddin Mubarak Shah who was also among the bisexual, pedophile Muslim sultans.
K.S. Lal, in his book, Muslim Slave System in Medieval India, documented the bisexual, pedophile Muslim sultans. Qutb had a boy lover, Hasan. Ultimately the degraded creature was killed by his minion when one homosexual lover named Khusrau Khan engaged the king in his intimate company and got him killed just as happened to his father.
The culture of the west is becoming so debased to the extent that even the professing Christians, they do not see what lays on the horizon lacking to learn from history that such behavior in the Muslim world fulfilled Romans 1:26-27 in which God gave them over to shameful lusts were men abandoned natural relations with women and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. The whole of Scripture is prophetic and that penalty was death through assassinations, corruption and judgments from the Almighty God who gave us the most beautiful and wonderful pure faith of Christianity. A convert from Islam bows at the mention of the word "Christianity" while the west denounce its most wonderful history and amazing civilization in which even the Messianic and the Evangelical denounce Crusaders and Constantine without any shame. A debased society that says "thou shall not judge" always laying it as rule to defend the homosexual yet continually judges with such slander and malice the men who carried the shield of the cross to which I bow to and am not ashamed to make the sign of the cross.
Christianity gave me the light. While I attended high-school at Dar Jasser in Bethlehem where the Muslim history was scrubbed of all the debauchery, but truth was whispered at times when teachers would every now and then expressed their conscious having run into obvious words in the poetry and the Quran using the word "ghilman" (sex boys) which compelled them to finally tell the obvious.
ISIS's Islam is no different from when Qutub's Islam whom was succeeded by Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq who was murdered by his son Muhammad bin Tughlak. Even the famed Ibn Batuta who was an African traveling historian documents the story on how Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq dabbled in mathematics, physics and Greek philosophy (what the west likes to pick up to complement Islam) yet the demented Tughluq surpassed his predecessors in bloodshed and brutality and just as ISIS did laid waste with pillage and murder till the inhabitants fled to the jungle. And just as ISIS does, he killed so many Hindus that in the words of the Moslem historian Ibn Batuta, "constantly in front of his royal pavilion and his Civil Court a mound of dead bodies and a heap of corpses, while the sweepers and executioners were wearied out by their work of dragging" the victims "and putting them to death in crowds." In order to found a new capital at Daulatabad he drove every inhabitant from Delhi and left it a desert and hearing that a blind man had stayed behind in Delhi, he ordered him to be dragged from the old to the new capital, so that only a leg remained of the wretch. (Durant, page 461) And who would believe a couple decades ago when we lambasted our warnings that such history would be catapulted into our time: