Ben Swann Full Disclosure conducts a one on one interview with Dr. Jim Garrow who claims the Obama administration is weeding out top military brass who are unwilling to fire upon Americans. Ben talks with Dr. Garrow and asks viewers questions.
Garrow indicates that his source referenced an officer who was called into a private meeting and given a litmus test of whether or not he would be able to fire on Americans. Upon, his answer that he would not do so, he was, in Garrow's words "forced to resign on the spot." Specifically, Garrow indicates that a scenario was with gun confiscation.
While the source is not cited and many people understand keeping sources under wraps, couldn't anyone make this claim? Garrow says that he has known this source for seventeen years. He says that his source is a name that most people in America would know.
One question posed to Garrow was, what was the context of the question? Could it mean to suppress a violent insurrection by extremists groups, whether politically affiliated or not?
Garrow simply referred to what I can only assume if the Feinstein bill, and, in my opinion, didn't represent it fairly, as he said it included "any gun with a handle."
He was also asked if there was evidence that could be provided to give merit to his claims so that his claim could not be "washed away" in a conspiracy theory, even if it is true. He did say that some people question whether he even knew anyone at high levels and he went on to state the people he did know and "sat across the table from" in high levels (ie. Alexander Haig, William Bennet, Bill Simon and others were mentioned).
While Garrow appreciated the question and understood what was being asked, he could provide nothing further. To be fair, this is true in many cases where major stories are broken as well.
He was also asked how many officers this had happened to and he simply referenced those who have called into various shows and indicated that it had gone on, which he said were at least "many dozens."
Additionally, there was the question of why wouldn't these individuals come forward together to out the story and confirm it. While I don't know that Garrow's answer was satisfactory, perhaps it is, as he suggested some sort of "official secrets act," we do know that the Obama administration has been harder on whistleblower's than any administration prior.
I know there are many, many good men and women in our military that will not obey such an order. I also realize there are those who will do and say anything to get ahead or not lose their job. Garrow indicates that his release of this information is to let the public know what is going on and to encourage those in the military that it is OK to say "No."
You can evaluate Garrow's testimony yourself. Many readers at this site already suspect things like this from the Obama administration so this probably does not come as a surprise, especially in light of the bulk solicitations and purchases by this administration. However, I don't have a problem with posting the video as I believe Ben Swann to be one of the top real investigative journalists who desires to get at the truth. To that end, here's the video interview.Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.