Earlier this week, while he was in Illinois, Barack Obama may have revealed what he truly would like to see happen within the United States. You see it was while Obama was a student at Occidental College that he had time to spend with a man named John Drew. Both were at that time avowed students of Marxism and went to all the Marxist ideology courses and meetings they could attend. Obama was in fact a member of the Democratic Socialist Alliance. This was revealed when I had the privilege of having the only known interview of Dr. John Drew.

John Drew said,

"Yes, that was the Marxist student association on campus, Caroline hung up a huge banner of Karl Marx where the students met at the Occidental College Quad. She and I were pretty intense Marxists we had been involved in about a two-year relationship and she was the one who introduced me to Barack Obama, she knew him better than I did. I wouldn't be saying he was a Marxist/Socialist revolutionary if it was just based with my face to face talk with him, my comments are based on knowing Chandoo, having known Caroline and the Marxist Professors and that whole culture."

Here we have a bit of the insight of Obama's ideology when he was at Occidental College in California, but just what does this have to do with what he is doing now? Let us piece this together for all to get a bit of understanding of what Obama said while in Illinois earlier this week and what he stated while learning the ways of Karl Marx, the father of Marxism. In his speech before the crowd in Illinois he made a comment many times about the "in-equality" of the United States and how it is driving a wedge into the fabric of the middle class, or words to that affect. Obama is actually trying to stoke the fire of revolution, the fire of hate, the fire of his ideology from Occidental College that has been burning in the back of his mind. If one goes back to the interview given by John Drew and then compares what Obama said at the rally held in Illinois, perhaps one can see just what seems to be a "fleshing out" of Obama's ideology.

Barack Obama has been dividing the United States since he took office. He's constantly made statements concerning the top 1 percent, of which he is now a member and the middle class. If we go back into the history books we can readily see that in order to bring about strife, the people that wish for it to develop have to begin with some sort of substance that will drive a wedge between groups of people that was not there before. In the United States, up until the 2010 elections, race was not much of an issue since we had just elected our first black president. Since then race cards have been played consistently over and over.

So why does it seem that Obama's dream of having a Communist-style revolution is now within his reach? Obama is very shrewd and he has his right hand lady who, like him, also came from a background heavily developed out of the Communist/Socialist ideology, Ms. Valerie Jarret. Consider Obama's remarks about the US not doing as he says could result in "social unrest." Taken by itself the remarks are very light and fall into place in his speech, but taken with his ideology of having a Communist-style revolution it takes on an entire new meaning, and one that has to be hit head on before he sets his plan into action. How can we even consider making such a statement? Well, in the last 4 days Obama has stated that all the either "fake or phony" scandals have been shoved out in front and they do not warrant such high attention. However, it was not part of his plan for people to actually see these scandals or to have such exposure with them. They were supposed to have started the strife that he has been seeking since he began developing his Marxist ideology back at Occidental College in California.

Now we know that many will say this is just a type of conspiracy concept, but is it? Let us look at some very hard evidence to the fact that Obama had seriously considered to have a Communist-style revolution. We did not connect the dots, so to speak, until he made mention of "social unrest." How could we even consider connecting these statements or any others to a move by Obama and his administration to bring on the very social unrest he speaks of? All we have to do is to go to Dr. John Drew's answer to a question which appears to link the statements from Obama in Illinois directly to his dreams from Occidental College. See for yourself. When asked about the face to face meeting with Obama, John Drew stated:

"I never had face to face (meetings) after Christmas and in Partolo Valley California which is near Stanford. I basically spent the day with him, Chandoo, and Caroline Boss. I was visiting Boss from Cornell where I was studying. I graduated ahead of them but I had come back for the trip to be with Caroline. We hung out with Obama and Chandoo for that day and went out to lunch then we ended up arguing pretty late in the evening about Marxism and politics. Whether or not there would be a revolution, a Communist style revolution in the United States. The key takeaway there is that I may have been one of the first people in the world to confront Barack Obama's kind of silly belief, Marxist idea that there was going to be an inevitable Communist revolution coming to the United States. I feel in my heart that I had persuaded him that that wasn't in the cards and it wasn't going to happen and at the end of that time he believed me. I think a bunch of us, Marxist-Communist style people were turned off by a Communist style revolution I think that Obama would have heard that from someone else eventually, but from his reaction, I think I was the first person that he could identify as an ally, and a friend and supporter who sincerely believes that there would never be a Communist style revolution. That debate I think helped Obama intellectually, but it helped seal the end of my romantic relationship with Marxism."

Drew went on to add, "My take on Piven and Cloward is included in my published doctoral dissertation in this book, The American Welfare System: Origins, Structure, and Effects. I demonstrated that there was no relationship between street violence or riots and the later rise of the Progressive Era Mothers' Pensions movement."

Here we can see that perhaps during his talks with Obama they spoke about the use of welfare or other types of ways to cause social unrest. Could this be a smoking gun in what Obama is thinking now?

Look a little closer at the first part of Dr. Drew's answer "… we ended up arguing pretty late in the evening about Marxist and politics. Whether or not there would be a revolution, a Communist style revolution in the United States. The key takeaway there is that I may have been one of the first people in the world to confront Barack Obama's kind of silly belief, Marxist idea that there was going to be an inevitable Communist revolution coming to the United States."

Here is the only place that the people of the United States can factually see that Obama had the idea that a Communist-style revolution would be needed in the United States! No other time has the idea even been approached mush less shown! Here we have the insight for why Obama came out with the Zimmerman case. Perhaps this is even the reason why he inserted himself into the picture saying that Trayvon Martin could have been him some 35 years earlier. Yet, what Obama does not say is that he had never been in the same position as Trayvon Martin. As a matter of fact, Obama has always been above the position of Trayvon Martin and most blacks of the United States! Obama played in royal courtyards while he was in Indonesia. He was raised by his grandparents while in Hawaii and attended the best schools, none of which are even remotely like what many blacks go to today. Still Obama wants the blacks to feel like he knows how they feel. Why? So Obama can stir up the social unrest he has been wanting since his Marxist days at Occidental College.

Just to give you an idea of just how Obama presented himself while at Occidental, consider what John Drew stated about him.

"He hung with Chandoo, but the impression I had with Obama was that they were both very wealthy. I thought that Barack Obama was a descendent from royalty from the way he carried himself. It did turn out that he did spend his summers on the grounds of the palace of the sultan of Jakarta in Indonesia. According to David Remnick,("The Bridge, Alfred A. Knopf, 2010, page 104"), that is where Obama would spend his summers. So he actually did grow up on the grounds of an Indonesian Palace. Through his step-father, Lolo Soertoro, he actually had ties to the royal family."

Information about how Obama's mother lived on the grounds of the palace of the Sultan of Yogakarta is available in David Remnick's book, The Bridge, on pages 84-88.

So now we can see clearly what Barack Obama is attempting to do. He's looking to bring about social unrest, so that he might take advantage of it to gain more power and introduce full blown Communism into the United States.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.