Remove the word "Democracy" from your American vocabulary!

"The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government..." ― The Constitution of the United States of America, Article IV, Section 4 [1]
What exactly is a democracy? We hear it everywhere from just about everyone of any importance who has a voice. Democracy is a quintessential part of the American vernacular; the embodiment of our nation's history and heritage; the bedrock principle upon which this country was founded.

Right?

In this essay, I will answer that question to the best of my abilities and clarify exactly what a democracy is in comparison to a republic and how our lawful form of government is being subverted from within, so that there is no room for misunderstanding or misinterpretation.

Let's start with the word democracy. Where did it come from? What is its origin? Let's analyze the root words.

The prefix "demo" is derived from the Greek root word dêmos (δμος), meaning "people." For example, the word demographic relates to the written study of the structure of populations of people groups in particular regions of the world.

The suffix of democracy, "ocracy" [also "cracy" in nouns] comes from the Greek root word krátos (κράτος), and denotes a government by a particular sort of people or according to a particular principle; meaning "force" or "power."

So, the Greek dēmokratía (δημοκρατια) combines the elements dêmos, which means "people," and krátos, which means "power." Simply put, dēmokratía (or dêmos-krátos) means "power of the people" or its variant, "rule of the majority."

Thus, a democracy is a government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the popular vote of the people and exercised directly by them and not by elected representatives. In stark contrast, a republic (Latin rēs pūblica, meaning "public affair" or "commonwealth") is a government in which power resides in elected individuals representing the citizen body and government leaders who exercise power according to the Rule of Law.

Likewise, the suffix "crat" means rule or ruler, so the word "democrat" means one who observes the absolute rule of the people.

Words have meaning under the law, and they have very specific intent. Also, our framers did not intend for those words—which were carefully chosen according to the definition of those words—to be interpreted. And to really understand the definitions of those words, you need to reference the Webster's 1828 (or earlier) dictionary. And to understand the intent of the founding fathers, you must read the Federalist Papers and the Anti-Federalist Papers and their writings and their letters and their books and their speeches. Then you will know what they meant.

Intent is EVERYTHING IN THE LAW, and if you think that none of that matters to you, then you are not an American and are of no use or consequence in the animating contest of Freedom and to the restoration of the Constitution for the United States of America to its rightful place as the Supreme Law of the land.

To understand the law you must understand the intent of those who passed the law. That's why we have a Congressional Record. That's why we have the Federal Register. That's why the writings of the major lawmakers of this nation, and the major figures and the founding of this nation have been so carefully preserved over the years. It could even be said that that these full body of writings could be the very foundation of the law.

However, most Americans sadly do not understand the foundation of the law in this country, and that the first document of the law didn't even have anything to do with this country at all. It was called the Magna Carta of 1297, the "Great Charter of the Liberties," which was drafted by the Archbishop of Canterbury and agreed upon by King John, promising the protection of rights.

The second document in law is the Mayflower Compact, the first governing document of Plymouth Colony. And then comes some of the pacts and constitutions and agreements and contracts struck by the first colonists in their colonies and towns and societies which they formed after emigrating from Europe.

And then the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation, which are still a part of our law, the Constitution of the United States of America and the Bill of Rights, and the lawful Amendments thereto, the "Charters of Freedom" which most Americans have never read, don't even understand and have no desire to comprehend let alone to master.

Personally, I fail to see why they could not be understood, because they are so very simple and clearly written. They are the very definition of simplicity and there can be no genuine misconstruction of their ends as they leave absolutely nothing to interpretation, especially the Constitution and its integrated Bill of Rights.

So, why is a democracy a bad idea? Doesn't a government by the power of the people sound good? Theoretically, on paper, yes. But practically, it has always failed in every case whatsoever it has been attempted throughout history.

Italian Prime Minister Benito Mussolini, one of the founding theoreticians of Fascism, said, "Democracy is beautiful in theory; in practice it is a fallacy." Mussolini ruled democratically until 1925 when he felt powerful enough, dropped all pretense of democracy and set-up a legalized dictatorship in his country.

A democracy might have been a good system of governance IF the people as a majority were moral and virtuous, and who, in the words of George Washington, regarded the "eternal rules of Order and Right which Heaven itself hath ordained."

That is the same reason why John Adams said that our Constitution was "made only for a moral and religious people . . . wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

In like manner, Benjamin Franklin wrote in a letter to Abbés Chalut and Arnaud in 1787 that "only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."

Is that now true for this nation of ours? Do we have more need of masters? Someone, somewhere sure thinks so.

Let's now study a very important document from our nation's history, which is now elusive and nearly impossible to acquire a copy of.

Issued by the United States War Department on November 30, 1928, the Soldiers Training Manual offered instruction on the topic of Citizenship. Its intent was to prepare soldiers that they "may be returned to civilian life better equipped as the defenders of the institutions of our Government in time of peace as well as in time of war."

A primary purpose of the manual was to impart valuable knowledge of our republican form of government, and an understanding of the many ways it is superior to a democracy. After all, every member of the U.S. Armed Forces swears an Oath affirming that they will "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

The following definitions were published by the authority of the United States Government to differentiate between our republic and a democracy.

Prepared under the direction of the Chief of Staff. 

Official definition of DEMOCRACY

Copied from the 1928 U.S. Army Training Manual No. 2000-25, published by the then War Department, Washington, D.C., November 30, 1928.

CITIZENSHIP

This manual supersedes Manual of Citizenship Training. The use of the publication "The Constitution of the United States," by Harry Atwood, is by permission and courtesy of the author.

CITIZENSHIP Democracy:

A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting or any other form of "direct" expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic — negating property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the majority shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, anarchy.

Vladimir Lenin, communist revolutionary, Premier of the Soviet Union, and the man who gave form to the modern socialist doctrine, said:

"Democracy is indispensable to socialism."

Karl Marx, socialist revolutionary, founder of the social sciences and sociology, and author of 'The Communist Manifesto' (1848), said:

"The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."

And both Vladimir Lenin and Albert Pike said:

"The ultimate goal of socialism is communism."

Albert Pike was the Grand Commander of North American Freemasonry and author of an 1871 letter to Giuseppe Mazzini (fellow Mason, Italian revolutionary and head of the transnational Sicilian Mafia) which envisioned three World Wars for the purpose of bringing about a one-world socialist government. In his book, Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Pike wrote that Lucifer is the god of Freemasonry.

Why is that important? Because Pike cited the linear democracy-socialism-communism agenda as the vehicle for world conquest and the destruction of all the governments, monarchies and religions of the word save his own: Masonic Luciferianism. And everywhere communism takes hold of a region, extreme religious persecution and purging of political dissidents becomes paramount.

In contrast to describing a democracy, the 1928 U.S. Army Training Manual 2000-25 defined a republic as the form of government which the United States of America is guaranteed under the law from its inception; the law which has never been amended, repealed, nor rescinded.

CITIZENSHIP Republic:

Authority is derived through the election by the people of public officials best fitted to represent them. Attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure. Attitude toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed principles and established evidence, with a strict regard to consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of territory may be brought within its compass. Avoids the dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and progress. Is the 'standard form' of government throughout the world. A republic is a form of government under a Constitution, which provides for the election of: 

(1) an executive and (2) a legislative body, who working together in a representative capacity, have all the power of appointment, all power of legislation, all power to raise revenue and appropriate expenditures, and are required to create (3) a judiciary to pass upon the justice and legality of their governmental acts and to recognize (4) certain inherent individual rights. Take away any one or more of those four elements and you are drifting into autocracy. Add one or more to those four elements and you are drifting into democracy. — Atwood

Superior to all others. — Autocracy declares the divine right of kings; its authority can not be questioned; its powers are arbitrarily or unjustly administered. Democracy is the "direct" rule of the people and has been repeatedly tried without success. Our Constitutional fathers, familiar with the strength and weakness of both autocracy and democracy, with fixed principles definitely in mind, defined a representative republican form of government. They made a very marked distinction between a republic and a democracy and said repeatedly and emphatically that they had founded a republic. 

By order of the Secretary of War: C.P. Summerall, Major General, Chief of Staff. Official: Lutz Wahl, Major General, The Adjutant General.

This training manual was withdrawn after less than five years in print. Shortly after the "bank holiday" in 1933, hush-hush orders from the White House suddenly demanded that all copies of Training Manual 2000-25 be withdrawn from the Government Printing Office and the Army posts, to be suppressed and destroyed without explanation.

This action was the beginning of the complete Communist control of our government from within.

While this indeed occurred, several copies of the manual survived in private ownership and still change hands today from time to time. Roosevelt also purged any negative references regarding "democracy" from other federal training materials, via Executive Order.

You see, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was a lifelong socialist who started America down the path of democracy, which is the political vehicle on the road to socialism. He was also a highly-degreed Freemason of the Scottish Rite of the Southern Jurisdiction, awarded the coveted meritorious 33rd degree before entering the presidency.

Incidentally, Harry S. Truman, a fellow 33rd degree Freemason and Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Missouri of the Scottish Rite of the Southern Jurisdiction [1], became the 33rd President of the United States of America upon the death of Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Also, Roosevelt met with two other fellow Masons, Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin, at the Yalta Conference in Potsdam, Germany in 1945 to formulate the forthcoming "Perestroika Deception" of the Cold War and the perceived fall of the Soviet Union as a means to disarm the West. That agenda was fleshed-out by these brethren in the guise of discussing Europe's post-war reorganization.

Why is that important? It is known throughout esoteric circles that only two U.S. Presidents have not been either members of Freemasonry or degreed adepts of various secretive fraternal societies, brotherhoods and orders. Those two presidents were Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy.

Thirty-nine days after the investiture of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's fifth cousin, Theodore Roosevelt, to the meritorious 33rd degree of Freemasonry, he erected a statue of Albert Pike at Judiciary Square in Washington D.C., where it stands to this day. In 1944, one year before Franklin D. Roosevelt's death, the remains of Albert Pike were removed from Oak Hill Cemetery in the Georgetown section of Washington, D.C., and placed in the House of the Temple at 1733 16th Street NW, achieving a mystical apotheosis. The House of the Temple is a Masonic shrine and mausoleum in Washington, D.C., which serves as the headquarters of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the Southern Jurisdiction, and it sits just 13 blocks from the Oval Office.

Why is that important? Because Christopher Albert Pike, an adept of the Indo-Aryan mysteries and still regarded as the preeminent and influential Masonic philosopher, was a socialist.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was born into the Anglo-Saxon Delano dynasty in 1882, the family of aristocratic drug-traffickers [1][2][3][4] who amassed vast fortunes during the Opium Wars of the 17th Century. The grandfather of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Captain Warren Delano, Jr., born in 1809 in Fairhaven, Massachusetts, descended from a long line of seafaring Delanos, was an apprentice at a Boston merchant bank and shipping firm, and developed trading routes in South America, the Pacific Islands and China.

Warren Delano, Jr., became the head of the Boston tea company, Russell & Company, and earned the position of Chief of Operations for Macao, Canton, and Hong Kong, in China. His greatest achievement in business was the expansion of Russell & Company's worldwide distribution and trade in opium. This allowed Warren to count his family one among the four hundred wealthiest families in the world.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt was also strongly connected to the Venetian Black Nobility of Europe and the Jewish/Masonic Astor bloodline [1][2][3][4].

Why is this back history important in reference to transforming our once-free Constitutional Republic into a socialist state?

On March the 9th of 1933, the U.S. Congress voted as part of the "banking emergency" to approve all past, present and future Executive Orders written by any president, regardless of party affiliation. Therefore, when they passed that law, the Congress effectively granted President Franklin Delano Roosevelt dictatorial powers, establishing an imperial Caesarean Executive emperor in the office of the presidency.

For a more thorough analysis of the Banking Emergency Act, the unlawful emergency powers statutes, the subversion of checks and balances in the United States and FDR's involvement, read my previous blogs: The War Powers of Government: America is Under Emergency Rule (06/03/14), and Administering of Martial Law: The Subversion of the Balance of Power (08/15/14).

In his Second State of the Union Address on January 4, 1935, Franklin D. Roosevelt said:

"We have undertaken a new order of things; yet we progress to it under the framework and in the spirit and intent of the American Constitution. We have proceeded throughout the Nation a measurable distance on the road toward this new order."

What was this "new order" undertaken by Roosevelt? It was the same new order as Adolph Hitler's German Nazi "Neuordnung"; the same as George Herbet Walker Bush's "New World Order"; Heinz Alfred (Henry) Kissinger's "New World Order"; the "New World Order" of the Council on foreign Relations; the "New Order of Nations" of the United States Army War College; Barack Hussein Obama's "World Order" and "New Order"; and the motto on the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States, added by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933, "Novus Ordo Seclorum" (New Secular Order or New Order of the World), and many, many others.

This new order is the materialistic and worldly social engineering of this country apart from its founding Godly morality, apart from the Rule of Law, and held under the auspices of Roosevelt's "New Deal."

The Social Security Act, a sweeping welfare program of federal entitlements signed into law by FDR on August 14, 1935, two years into his presidency, catapulted America down the road to ruin. It should come as no surprise that the terms "democracy," "progress," "change," and "new order" are all code words for socialism, and for transforming our once-free old Republic into a new Social Democracy. For if you're paying attention, the envisioned new order is to be a world totalitarian socialist government with the unification of church and state power, and a mob shackled in slavery.

The new order really is nothing new at all. It's really very old—taking us back to the ancient feudal despotism of antiquity.

Social Security isn't even "social," nor is it even remotely approaching "security." It's a trap. In the Pennsylvania Assembly's Reply to the Governor, dated November 11, 1755, Benjamin Franklin wrote a great truth:

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

When FDR instituted the Social Security Act, most Americans abdicated personal responsibility and stopped saving their money for old age, because they thought the government was going to take care of them. Why? Because the government was taking so much out of their paycheck every week for their "social security," and kept reciting a narrative of "protection" and "safeguarding assets" and for the "general welfare" to assuage their fears. The official story sheltered under the guise of "good intentions."

It didn't happen that way, however, and most of those Americans—your grandparents and mine included—who trusted in the President and his socialist program, were absolutely devastated when they finally figured it all out in their old age, because there isn't any money there and what little if any is there isn't even enough to live on.

Whereas, if they had saved and invested that money responsibly themselves, they would have retired as millionaires. It's a giant scam, a ponzi scheme that would make the Great Train Robbery blush. If your grandparents or parents are depending on Social Security, sit down and ask them—or any elderly person—how big their check is and what it pays for and what it buys. And then consider the current living costs and prices for rentals and for food and for clothing and for medical expenses and for cars and gas and everything else. Those who rely on Social Security were, and are, very poor in old age.

Not only that, when Social Security was first introduced, most Americans were terrified that the Social Security numbers would one day be used to identify them personally, and be used against them. And many Christians decried the number as the possible prophetic fulfillment of the scriptural Revelation of John, chapter 13, in which was written:

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."

In response to the refusal of most Americans to participate, and their outright rejection of the proposed Social Security program, the government promised that Social Security numbers would never be used for personal identification, but only for Social Security administrative purposes. That, too, turned out to be a lie. Today, you pretty much can't do anything without your 9-digit Social Security number. You are personally identified with that number from cradle to grave.

It's not Social Security, and it never was.

Also, there is the issue with the mystical Social Security "trust fund." All of the trust funds maintained by the United States of America are codified in the United States Code. They are all listed—every single one of them. Anyone can read the U.S. Code online or in a law library and look up the trust funds administered and maintained by the United States of America under the law. THERE IS NO SOCIAL SECURITY TRUST FUND! There never has been, and there never will be.

Although, there exists very clever legalese and deceptive official websites and online forums attempting to relieve people of their critical analysis.

If you actually read the U.S. Code and the law therein which implements the Social Security Administration, you will see that it is just another unlawful payroll tax levied upon the labor of the American people. We also got tricked into paying income tax in a voluntary withholding agreement with the federal government. All of the hundreds of billions of dollars (estimated total $2.6 trillion) collected from Social Security goes into the general fund of the federal government, not into some imaginary old-age retirement trust.

That is why when the Congress takes money supposedly allocated to the Social Security fund, and uses it for something else, they are not technically doing anything wrong under the law. When the President takes Social Security money and uses it for something else, he is not breaking the law. He can pretty much do anything he wants with it, as it comes from the general fund.

Anyone who tells you otherwise is either repeating something they heard from someone else, or is bold-faced lying to you. Don't believe them or me. Look it up for yourself. Or don't, and just go on believing the big lie. Too many people take too many things for granted in this country, and that is precisely the reason we are in the huge mess that we find ourselves in.

If you haven't learned it yet, all socialists are liars and conspiracists. They cannot ever tell the truth about what they are doing, nor can they operate openly and on the level, because if they did then the people would reject their plan outright. That is why the entire platform of the socialist new world order is built upon a foundation of deception, because the truth is too terrible to stand on its own merits.

Former United States Secretary of State Madeline Albright, in an admission of conspiracy, summoned the Spirit of the Marshall Plan during her address at the 346th Commencement at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts on June 5, 1997, to support a new international vision of democracy. In her address she said, "Today, I say that no nation in the world need be left out of the system we are constructing."

This plan was published in the Los Angeles Times article, "Albright Logs America's Role as Pathfinder, Touts New World Order That All Nations Can Join," June 6, 1997, by Norman Kimster (reprinted in the St. Paul Planet Press), in which is written of her address: "In essence, Albright described a New World Order of nations made in the image of the United States."

A full transcript of Albright's address can be found at the website of the Harvard University Gazette. None of this plan of the international socialists is a secret. It is all out in the open in the public domain, for anyone who is willing to look.

General Douglas MacArthur described the plan this way in his memoir:

"For from one end of the world to the other there is a titanic struggle to seize control of industry and of the economics. Whether this be in the masquerade of Communism or Socialism or Fascism the purpose is the same—to destroy a primary element of Freedom and preempt it for the State . . . the forcing of a centrally controlled economic life upon all persons in the nation under an authoritarian monopoly that is politically managed."

The greatest threat to Freedom is the ever-increasing expansion of power in the hands of men who wield governmental authority for selfish aims without the constraints of the law. The threat also lies in the force of rulership by a people not constrained within the moral boundaries of Order and Right; a mobocracy of majority rules.

The corrupt men who wield governmental authority and who subvert the law for profit and gain are NOT the government. The government of this nation IS the Constitution for the United States of America, the Bill of Rights and the lawful Amendments thereto. And this Contract between the People and the individual sovereign States of the Union guarantees not a democracy but a republican form of government.

Teach your children and grandchildren these most important of truths, because if you do not, then they may very well find themselves enslaved, shackled to a forced, "centrally controlled economic life" under an "authoritarian monopoly" without any hope of restoring the universal blessings of Liberty and Freedom for themselves or their posterity.

Noah Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language, widely regarded as a work of great American importance and the essential book of definitions of law, defined the English language in the context of the era of the founding documents of this nation, and of the original intent of its framers.

Webster's 1828 Dictionary defined Democracy and Republic in this way:

DEMOCRACY, noun [Gr. People, and to possess, to govern.] Government by the people; a form of government, in which the supreme power is lodged in the hands of the people collectively, or in which the people exercise the powers of legislation. Such was the government of Athens. 

REPUB'LIC, noun [Latin respublica; res and publica; public affairs.] A commonwealth; a state in which the exercise of the sovereign power is lodged in representatives elected by the people. In modern usage, it differs from a democracy or democratic state, in which the people exercise the powers of sovereignty in person.

Noah Webster said:

"A pure democracy is generally a very bad government, It is often the most tyrannical government on earth; for a multitude is often rash, and will not hear reason."

Noah Webster's distant relative, Daniel Webster, a renowned Senator and Statesman, once enunciated on the floor of the Senate what real security means:

"Our security is our watchfulness of executive power. It was the Constitution of this department, which as infinitely the most difficult part in the great work of creating our present government; to give the executive department such power as should make it useful, and yet not such as should render it dangerous; to make it efficient, independent and strong, and yet to prevent it from sweeping away everything by its union of military and civil authority, by the influence of patronage, and office, and force."

Why Democracies Fail:

A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess [the public funds] from the Treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the political candidate who promises the most freebies and benefits from the public treasury. The absolute and irrefutable result is that Democracy always collapses over a loose fiscal policy, the mob sentiment and this is always followed by a Dictatorship.

Did I say, "republic?" By God, yes, I said "republic!" Long live the glorious republic of the United States of America. Damn democracy. It is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, miscegenation, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive.

(Source: Professor Alexander Fraser Tytler, Lord Woodhouselee (1747-1813), Westbrook Pegler, New York Journal American, January 25 and 26, 1951, under the titles: "Upholds Republic of U.S. Against Phony Democracy," and "Democracy in the U.S. Branded Meaningless.")

Thomas Babington Macaulay, 1st Baron Macaulay, (1800-1859), a British historian and Whig politician, wrote:

"American democracy must be a failure because it places the supreme authority in the hands of the poorest and most ignorant part of the society."

Social democracies have always been the political arm of dictatorships; the vehicle by which authoritarian and autocratic policies are legislated into place in order to pave the way for a government to assume absolute control over the individual.

In the speeches and writings of its most revered philosophers and authors, democracy is the code word for socialism.

For a taste of what socialism looks like in its purest form, recall from history the National Socialist German Workers' Party. The Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP), commonly referred to in English as the "Nazi Party," transformed the representative federal German Weimar Republic into a totalitarian social democracy from 1920 to 1945.

No, Nazi Germany was not a communist nation like many textbooks say. The Third Reich of the Thule and Vril Societies blamed the communists for their ills as a cover for their own Hegelian ideology of political conflict resolution. Nazi Germany was socialist in the extreme reach and affect of the doctrine.

That's why the Austrian/German ruler was called the Kaiser, the German word for "Emperor," an office directly derived from the title of the Caesar of the Roman Empire.

That's why Adolf Hitler granted himself the title of Führer, the German word for "Leader" or "Guide." At the height of Hitler's power, he had effectively dissolved the representative federal Weimar Republic by purging all political opposition, and assumed supreme authority over the now democratized German people, therefore establishing a socialistic dictatorship.

As Nazi Germany was a state of National Socialism, so too was Soviet Russia—the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)—an oxymoron in itself due to the fact that no socialist State could ever be a republic as defined in Western law. And it was a cadre of Soviet Russian spies, namely convicted Soviet agent Alger Hiss, who along with 14 members of the Council on Foreign Relations penned the Charter of the United Nations, an organization of International Socialism (Nazism).

The United States Army knew all of this back in 1928. Why don't American citizens know it today?

Why are we being taught in our public schools, colleges, courtrooms, by the government, the Pentagon, and from every officially-endorsed state news agency—from the President of the United States of America on down to the local school teacher—that the United States of America is no longer a Constitutional Republic, but a Democracy? And what is the visible utility of eliminating the specific republican citizenship training from our Armed Forces?

Answer that, and you'll know exactly what the agenda is and who stands to benefit from the outcome. It's no wonder we have a famine of the truth in the land and three generations of Americans who know nothing about our guaranteed form of government as clearly defined under the law of this nation. They believed what they were told without verifying it in their own research.

Franklin D. Roosevelt said that "the real safeguard of democracy, therefore, is education," and he was 100% correct. The education system in this country has been infiltrated and subverted by psychopoliticians and social engineers, and therefore we as parents are going to have to teach our children the truth. They for sure will not hear it in school or on the "all-seeing eye" in your living room.

Every single person and/or organization who is promulgating the socialization of America—especially our Marxist/socialist National Education Association—is one of two things. They are either (1) ignorant, or they are (2) in on the agenda to socialize us, and are therefore in a state of conspiratorial insurgency against the lawful supremacy of the Constitution, which is an act of treason (Sources: Article III, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 [1]; 18 U.S. Code § 2381 [1]).

Deception or Intention. Either way, the people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.

Recall when Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, the leader of the U.S.S.R., banged his fists and shoe on the podium in the United Nations assembly on October 12th of 1960, railed against the West and screamed, "We will bury you . . . We do not have to invade the United States. We will destroy you from within."

He was absolutely correct. And indeed, Khrushchev's party colleagues forcefully removed him from power shortly after this outburst, because he had said too much and had given away the socialist plan to infiltrate, subvert and destroy the United States of America from within our own governmental system.

Turns out they would never need to invade the mainland United States with a standing army. Instead, they succeeded in changing the thinking of the majority of Americans to align with socialist ideology. How's that for majority rule?

Tell me, is this plan currently in the final stages of being realized, exactly as Khrushchev predicted it would? If you don't see it by now, then you never will.

My readers know how much I love poignant historic quotations, so I will leave you with these final thoughts, which tell it like it is:

"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." — Benjamin Franklin

"Democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine." — Thomas Jefferson

"Democracy is the road to socialism." — Karl Marx

"Democracy is the art and science of running the circus from the monkey cage." — H. L. Mencken

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." — Winston Churchill

"Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty." — Plato

"Democracy . . . while it lasts, is more bloody than either aristocracy or monarchy. Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide." — John Adams

"Remember, the United States is not a democracy—and has never been intended to be a democracy." — Noam Chomsky

So then, America, change your vocabulary. Be a REAL American! Embrace your Constitutional Republican form of government, which is guaranteed and protected under the exhaustive legal framework of this nation, the only governmental system which ever recognized the Creator-endowed Freedom of all people. Restore it to its rightful place of lawful supremacy. Reject the deception and teach others the self-evident truth, especially your children, that they may likewise ignite brushfires of Freedom in the minds of men, and regard the eternal rules of Order and Right, forever invoking the propitious smiles of Heaven and the merciful blessings of our eternal God Almighty.

And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free (John 8:32).

Source

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.