In an article published yesterday by Michael Snyder of the Economic Collapse Blog (one of my favorite writers, and someone I often look to for guidance), Michael lays out the case for why a Hillary Clinton indictment is virtually assured, even potentially imminent, based on reports coming from sources directly inside the FBI. He bases his position on what has already been reported by mainstream media, and by all accounts, appears as if it might even be accurate too, but it's only part of the story.
In his article, which I include after my video, Snyder explains the reasons why a Hillary indictment should be a foregone conclusion under any “normal circumstances.” Under “normal circumstances, Michael Snyder would be 100% correct in his assessment, however, the circumstances our country finds itself in today are anything but normal!
In the video below, I’ll review how in Snyder's analysis, he fails to take into account several very sophisticated constitutional maneuvers the Democrats have available to them, ones that all but guarantee Hillary will not only never be prosecuted, but that she’ll also never spend a single day inside the Grey Bar Hotel where she belongs. That includes even IF Donald Trump manages to win the election despite a very hostile electoral map, which I'll also cover.
In addition to explaining how the electoral map is presently shaping up, and what it all means, I'll explain why charges of treason will go nowhere, and why impeachment proceedings If/when Hillary gets her coronation will also go nowhere if attempted. Everything shared in the video is based on my own knowledge of the Constitution as an attorney myself, the words of Horace Cooper who is an adjunct fellow with the National Center for Public Policy Research, co-chairman of the Project 21 National Advisory Board and a legal commentator, and “The Great One,” Mark Levin.
As I explain in the video, many in the media (and elsewhere), are of the belief that in order for Obama to pardon Hillary Clinton for the crimes that are becoming increasingly more evident by the hour she is guilty of, that she would have to be indicted, tried and convicted, and all before Obama leaves office while he still has the power to pardon her. Constitutionally, nothing could be further from the truth. Recall there is already precedent for a sitting President to pardon a former President before he was ever charged with a crime, back when President Ford pardoned Nixon before any formal charges were brought.
Do you believe Loretta Lynch is going to bring formal charges against Hillary Clinton? Of course she won't. Not when Obama can be implicated in the email scandal, which we now know is fact. Do you realize that even if the Attorney General did have a moment of conscious and charged Hillary, then Obama could simply pardon her before the ink is dry on the indictment? Certainly, the argument could be made, that it would be “political suicide,” for Obama to do such a thing, but would it really? More than letting Trump succeed him? Not at all.
Once Hillary assumes her throne in the Oval Office, do you think it matters to Obama, or to Democrats just days after an election (when the American people have no recourse until the next election cycle in two years), if there are “political implications” of a grossly immoral act by Obama? If so, please explain what you base your rationale on. Once Hillary assumes the Oval Office, game over. Whether there are, or are not elections in two years won’t even matter.
Adding to what makes this election even more crazy, are two additional factors I cover in the video above about the wildcard candidacy of Evan McMullin, and if by Devine intervention somehow Hillary is excluded from the race. The second might occur if Obama does exercise an ounce of integrity for once in his life, and chooses not pardon Hillary, and she is disqualified from the presidential race. Then what? In the video above, I explain how Tim Kaine would NOT move to the top of the Democrat ticket, but rather how the Speaker of the House (Paul Ryan) would assume the role of President. Yes, you read that right.
There is also the possibility that if Utah somehow does not go to Trump because of Evan McMullin, the anti-Trump conservative independent who has thrown a curveball into the electoral map. If you do the math, there's a real possibility that that the electoral votes could add up to 269-269. Then what? Real Clear politics has a tool on their website that let’s you play with hypotheticals where you can manipulate what the outcome would be depending on who might win what states.
Take a look for yourself, and use some of the most recent data available, a lot of which is covered in the video below, and you'll see that the possibility of a 269-269 tie is possible. If that were to happen, that too would send the vote to the House of Representatives to make a decision. However in this instance, rather than the Speaker becoming President, the House can chose from ANYONE running, so long as that person has one at least one electoral college vote. Imagine the constitutional crisis a situation like that leaves the country in. This is all thanks to the Clinton's once again!
No matter what you think of Trump, think of how many deaths there could be during riots or a constitutional crisis. Furthermore, consider what the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said in the link listed below. The military knows we are dealing with life and death this election. You should too when voting.
Doesn’t it seem like most of us are collectively holding our breath as we wait to see what will happen with this election? We are now only a handful of days away from election day and the polls have really tightened up, there are unprecedented concerns about post-election violence, and the Democratic nominee for president could be indicted literally any day now. The American people are going to be absolutely shocked when the FBI finally reveals what they have discovered regarding Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified materials, corruption at the Clinton Foundation, and other “stomach churning” matters that normally aren’t topics of polite conversation. Without a doubt, a Hillary Clinton indictment is coming. The only question now is when it will happen.
The moment that FBI Director James Comey sent his letter to Congress, he knew that someone’s head was going on the chopping block. If Hillary Clinton does not get indicted, Comey’s career is over and there is a very good chance that he will be going to prison instead. There is no way that he would have ever put himself on the line like this if extremely powerful evidence had not already been found against Clinton.
Because without a doubt, the vultures are circling. Just consider what House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi recently told CNN about Comey…
…Nancy Pelosi has claimed that FBI Director Comey is “not in the right job,” following his decision to reopen the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s misuse of a private email server.
“Maybe he’s not in the right job,” Pelosi said in an interview with CNN.
“I think that we have to just get through this election and just see what the casualties are along the way,” she continued, refusing to answer a question on whether she thought the FBI director should resign.
If it turns out that this investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails was renewed for no good reason, Comey is going to be strung out to dry, and he knows this.
Fortunately for Comey, there are reports that indicate that the evidence the FBI is compiling in this case is absolutely overwhelming. The following comes from Infowars…
According to other uncovered emails, Abedin and Clinton both sent and received thousands of classified and top secret documents to personal email accountsincluding Weiner’s unsecured campaign web site which is managed by Democratic political consultants in Washington D.C.
Weiner maintained little known email accounts that the couple shared on the website anthonyweiner.com. Weiner, a former seven-term Democratic Congressman from New York, primarily used that domain to campaign for Congress and for his failed mayoral bid of New York City.
At one point, FBI sources said, Abedin and Clinton’s classified and top secret State Department documents and emails were stored in Weiner’s email on a server shared with a dog grooming service and a western Canadian bicycle shop.
If you even send a single classified document outside of a secure channel that is a major criminal offense.
So if there are “thousands” of these emails as some reports are indicating, that should be enough to lock Hillary Clinton up for the rest of her life. According to investigative journalist Jerome Corsi, what Clinton and her close associates have done is “an obvious violation of the law”…
“The rules for handling classified materials is you’ve got to handle them on secured channels. You can’t let them go on an insecure channel,” Corsi said. “Clearly, sending these emails to Yahoo.com – and we know some of them had classified material because they’ve been marked classified – is a violation of the law, and it doesn’t require intent.”
He said Clinton and Abedin could have avoided this entire scandal by establishing secure government accounts and not sending any of it to private accounts.
“This was such an obvious violation of law, and perhaps leading to an espionage case or a treason case, that when presented to Comey, he really had no alternative than to go forward,” Corsi said.
But this isn’t the only investigation that could lead to a Hillary Clinton indictment. According to Fox News Channel’s Bret Baier, the FBI investigation into corruption at the Clinton Foundation is also “likely to lead to an indictment”…
Two sources with intimate knowledge of the FBI’s investigations told Fox News Wednesday that a probe of the Clinton Foundation is likely to lead to an indictment.
Fox News’s Bret Baier said Wednesday that the FBI probe into a possible pay-to-play scheme between Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation has been going on for over a year.
Sources told the news network that the investigation, which is conducted by the White Collar Crime division of the FBI, is a “very high priority.”
One of the anonymous sources told Baier that the amount of evidence now being uncovered is equivalent to “an avalanche coming in every day.”
If what these two sources have told Baier is true, then this changes everything. The following is how Real Clear Politics summarized the most important pieces of information from this report…
1. The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far and has been going on for more than a year.
2. The laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson have not been destroyed, and agents are currently combing through them. The investigation has interviewed several people twice, and plans to interview some for a third time.
3. Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton’s secret server on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature.
4. Sources within the FBI have told Baier that an indictment is “likely” in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, “barring some obstruction in some way” from the Justice Department.
5. FBI sources say with 99% accuracy that Hillary Clinton’s server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that information have been taken from it.
It is also being reported that the Department of Justice tried unsuccessfully to stop the investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
At this point, the struggle between the FBI and the Department of Justice is being described as “a civil war”. The Department of Justice is obviously extremely pro-Clinton, and meanwhile over at the FBI many agents consider Hillary Clinton to be “the antichrist personified”…
The currently serving FBI agent said Clinton is “the antichrist personified to a large swath of FBI personnel,” and that “the reason why they’re leaking is they’re pro-Trump.”
The agent called the bureau “Trumplandia”, with some colleagues openly discussing voting for a GOP nominee who has garnered unprecedented condemnation from the party’s national security wing and who has pledged to jail Clinton if elected.
Perhaps if Hillary Clinton had not made it a habit to regularly cuss out Secret Service agents and other law enforcement personnel over the past several decades she would have more friends in the FBI.
To a certain extent, this is simply a case of the chickens coming home to roost.
And at this point, even some of Hillary’s biggest supporters in the media are turning on her. Just consider what Chris Matthews of CNBC is saying about her…
“You know what I think? I’m going to be more judgmental than Beth who’s a straight reporter. I’ll make a judgment. Every time I watch a politician engage in a certain pattern of behavior before they go to the White House, they continue to engage in that pattern afterwards. People don’t change because we swear them into the White House. They become that person big-time. And the Clinton's were raising money like this hand over hand, hand over fist, back in 1996, using—we called it Motel 6. They were hoarding them in, pulling them in by train loads of contributors and then letting them sit in the Lincoln bedroom for a while and charging them by the hour. You can still vote for Hillary Clinton, but remember, you’re getting this as part of the package, because that’s been their pattern.“
Voting has already begun in most states, and Americans are facing a historic choice.
If they choose to elect the most wicked politician of this generation despite everything that has been revealed about her, I think that will speak volumes about where we stand as a nation.
Our leaders in Washington D.C. reflect who we are as a country. If if we willingly send Hillary Clinton to the White House, the truth is that we will fully deserve everything that happens to us afterwards.
Article posted with permission from The Last Great StandDon't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.