A Christian Filipino Nurse was abducted and gang raped by a group of Muslim men in the capital city of Libya on Wednesday.
The IBTimes reports:
The woman was seized outside her residence on Wednesday and taken to an unknown location, where she was sexually abused by up to six men, the Philippines' Foreign Affairs spokesman Charles Jose told reporters.
She was released about two hours later and taken to hospital for treatment.
The incident took place only a few days after a Filipino construction worker was beheaded, amid allegations he was killed for not being a Muslim.
Is anyone really surprised at this? This is taking place in the same country that the Obama administration backed Al-Qaeda jihadists against the late Muammar Ghadaffi, which has resulted in the same kind of ruthless and barbaric behavior of the Islamic animals that we are witnessing in Syria and Iraq. It seems every place that is "liberated" by the US, comes under the tyranny of Islam.
So why do they do this? They believe it is their right to do it.
First, consider that is part of the teachings of Islam. This woman was seized, or captured, by these men and as Islam teaches:
Sahih Muslim 3371—We went out with Allah's Messenger on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing azl (withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Messenger, and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
Sahih al-Bukhari 4138—We went out with Allah's Apostle for the invasion of Bun Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus [same as "azl" above]. So when we intended to do coitus interruptus, we said: "How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Apostle who is present among us? We asked (him) about it and he said: "It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul till the Day of Resurrection is predestined to exist, it will exist."
Sahih Muslim 3384—Jabir bin Abdullah reported that a person asked Allah's Apostle saying: I have a slave-girl and I practice azl with her, whereupon Allah's Messenger said: This cannot prevent that which Allah has decreed. The person then came (after some time) and said: Messenger of Allah, the slave-girl about whom I talked to you has conceived, whereupon Allah's Messenger said: I am the servant of Allah and His Messenger.
Would it even matter if this woman was married or not? Not at all…
Qur'an 4:24—Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess ...
David Wood points out the history of this verse:
Sunan Abu Dawud 2150—The Apostle of Allah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur'anic verse: "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." That is to say, they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.
Thus, the Qur'an allows men to have sex with their female captives and slave girls, and the Hadith provides numerous examples of how this was practiced. Yet we must follow this fact through to its logical conclusion. Muslims decided to have sex with their captives, whom they were later going to sell. Some of these captives were women whose husbands and families had been slaughtered by Muslims. Others had husbands who had been captured by Muslims. Would these women gladly consent to sexual intercourse with men who had killed their families or taken their families captive, and who were simply going to sell them into slavery when they arrived at the next town? Certainly not. But since the Qur'an and Muhammad authorized sex with these women (and said nothing about seeking their permission), we can only conclude that Muhammad allowed his followers to rape their captives.
Now consider what happens to this woman under Sharia. There are at least two examples I've written on that demonstrate that this woman would be found guilty of adultery and sentenced to prison. Just take a look at Australian Alicia Gali and Norwegian Marte Deborah Dalelven, both of whom were raped in Dubai, a land under Sharia law. Both women were sentenced to many months in jail for being victims of Islam's teachings and those that believe them.
Islam is a carnal religious, political totalitarianism that has no regard for women. America and the world had better be alert to the serious threat it poses to free people and instead of submitting to Islam, which is what Islam really means, not peace, we had better beat it down for good.
*The picture in this article is not the nurse, but was simply used to depict the story.Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.