Before I start, let me say that yes, there is conjecture here. I ask questions. I try to provide some answers. I realize that there are people who will poo-poo this article as not being "newsy" enough or too "conspiratorial." That's perfectly fine. If you're one, then I'd like to respectfully suggest that you stop reading at this point and move onto another article. If you fail to heed my warning, then you are responsible for having "wasted your time" reading it.

It is nearly impossible to prove things like what took place in Benghazi. What I mean by that is that we know something happened. However, people disagree over exactly what occurred. Having researched it, I am confident in my belief that Benghazi was a multi-pronged situation that was supposed to accomplish something for the Obama administration. In my opinion, Benghazi was supposed to be an event that ultimately would:

  1. appear legitimate with Muslims storming the Benghazi consulate to kidnap Ambassador Stevens
  2. distract Americans' attention so that the world would not notice that armaments and munitions were being diverted from Libya to the Syrian Rebels fighting Assad

These - in my opinion - are the two main prongs. Once Stevens was to have been kidnapped, Obama would have then come to the fore with this "brilliant" plan to exchange Stevens for the imprisoned Blind Sheik in a federal prison in North Carolina. Surely, no American would complain about this if it meant freeing one of our ambassadors.

I believe Ambassador Stevens was there solely (or mainly) to work out a deal that would get munitions flowing from Libya to Syria. In order for that to happen, there needed to be some type of cover, otherwise someone might see what was going on. Because of this, I fully believe the administration came up with a plan, like the one described above, and decided to "go hot" with it.

The problem? When the Muslims went to the consulate, they expected to find no resistance. Unfortunately for them, a couple of SEALs decided to ignore their orders and headed over to the consulate to defend it and the Americans there. Allegedly, President Obama was already asleep, which meant that Valerie Jarrett was the one to give the "stand down" order to all military who were prepped and ready for a rescue mission, except the SEALs.

img_nathan_mayer_rothschild_quote_fullscreenWhen the SEALs showed up at Benghazi, the Muslims began to think that they had been betrayed by Obama. They not only started fighting hard, but others came to help. Originally, the incident (without the SEALs) was to have been blamed on the 15-minute film that became well-known after the attack. When the SEALs entered the picture, things changed. Obama went with the prewritten script blaming the situation on the video and now Stevens was dead, not just kidnapped. The Muslims had no bargaining chip at all and Obama could not simply exchange the Blind Sheik for Stevens now.

By the way, you'll recall that shortly after Morsi was "elected" president of Egypt, he swore he would get the Blind Sheik out of prison, don't you?

Understand that much of what I've said can be proven, while the motives cannot. The theory is my own, and as such is open to correction. Some might go so far as to call it circumstantial evidence; court cases have been won on less.

This is the problem with things like this. Ultimately, each person has to decide for themselves what makes the most sense to them and then go with it.

Because I believe the things I've highlighted about Benghazi, I do so because those things make perfect sense to me. I didn't arrive to that conclusion without a good deal of reading and research. The links I've provided only provide you, the reader, with a cursory understanding of how I arrived to my conclusions. I'm assuming you've done your own research as well.

I believe the Benghazi situation is merely one of the ways that the Global Elite (GE) have worked since the early 1900s to literally destroy America; by gaining as much control as they could possibly garner. Though I believe many presidents (both Republican and Democrat) have had a hand in aiding the GE (an act of treason, by the way), there have been several presidents who have gone above and beyond to give the GE exactly what they wanted to have.

I firmly believe it actually began with the election of 1896 and has continued from that point through to, and including, 2014. It was prior to the 1896 election that three men - JP Morgan, John Rockefeller, and Andrew Carnegie - got together to do everything they could to "buy" a president. Long enemies of one another, they came together to stop an individual whom they believed had the ability to destroy their financial empires, William Jennings Bryan.

According to the History Channel's documentary, "The Men Who Built America," the three came together and decided that they would start promoting their own man, and castigate Bryan. They would not only do this in every paper or magazine they owned, but would line the pockets of editors of papers they did not own. They would spread the money around so that their man would win. They looked over America and found William McKinley, who eventually became the 26th president of the United States, winning with 271 electoral votes to Bryan's 176.

Are we to believe that what these individuals (who were Republicans at the time) did then, they stopped doing after they found success in getting McKinley elected? Surely, each individual will believe what they choose to believe, but the truth seems to be that once the elite got hold of the power in America, they never let go.

Dr. Dennis Cuddy,  has a great deal to say about what he calls the Power Elite and what they've been up to for the past few hundred years.

The Power Elite (PE) has been around for centuries, but a useful starting point for its “modern activities” would be about 350 years ago. In 1677 Sir William Temple (a sort of John Jay McCloy PE Agent) helped arrange the marriage of William of Orange (Holland) to Princess Mary (heir to the British throne). In 1688 another PE agent Thomas Wharton instigated the Revolution of 1688 replacing James II (a Stuart) with William and Mary as rulers of Britain. Shortly thereafter, William had the British treasury borrow heavily from the Bank of Amsterdam, whose bankers received a royal charter to establish the Bank of England which by 1698 was owed 16 million pounds by the British treasury. Indebtedness of sovereigns and nations is one of the primary means of PE control.

Cuddy has an excellent background for this sort of thing. "Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education."

Note the last sentence in the above quote. "Indebtedness of sovereigns and nations is one of the primary means of PE control." This is exactly how Mayer Amschel Rothschild started it all several hundred years ago with Great Britain. Once a nation becomes indebted to the Global Elite (GE), they own that nation or at the very least, can pressure that nation to do things the way the GE wants them done.

People who believe that the GE (call them the Illuminati, the Power Elite, or something else) is simply a fairy tale that plays well in books and movies, should do some more research. People as far back as Woodrow Wilson in this country have acknowledged that there exists a group of men with so much power that referencing them is done in a whisper (my paraphrase).

Next time, we'll be back with part two and we will detail how (according to various sources) the GE has made such gains in the U.S. and throughout the world, what their ultimate goals are, and how far along they are in making those goals a reality.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.