There is no debate as to whether our right to bear arms is under attack. This will be a perpetual battle between the forces of Tyranny and Liberty. Americans needs to now question all those who claim to be Pro-Gun and Pro-Freedom as to whether or not they are really on the side of Liberty or are they merely espousing rhetoric to garner donations for their various organizations? One such man is Stewart Rhodes of Oathkeepers. While Stewart Rhodes recently spoke out in defense of the Second Amendment, he failed miserably to identify one of the largest, well-funded, anti-gun groups in America, The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).

As of this, post it is a fact that Mr. Rhodes has not called out the Islamic agenda by American Muslims to disarm the infidels of our nation. He cannot claim that he is unaware of this and the information contained in this article. If he does claim to be aware, it will only prove that he is unfit to lead and command and he should step aside.

Some would say, "But wait I know peaceful Muslims." However, think of those that have carried out terrorist attacks. Many would say they were "peaceful" until the day they launched their attacks. America don't be duped. All Muslims are either:

1. Supporting the violent acts against non-Muslims and or are part of it.
Or
2. Are supporting the Islamic organizations who are actively seeking to subvert our Constitution and disarm America which, if they succeed, would guarantee another major genocide in this world of non-Muslims.

Real Patriots should be outraged by the attack on the U.S. Constitution by American Muslims and their leaders.

20130420-232531.jpgThe ISNA’s demand for gun control was in an article, with the unambiguous title “ISNA Seeks Gun Control," which cited their opposition to S. 2188, the “National right- to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2012,” and S. 2213, the “Respecting States’ Rights and Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2012.” An April 13th 2012 action alert on the ISNA’s website directs their supporters to contact Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to have him stop the legislation from becoming law. The same action alert states that ISNA is part of the Brady Center’s “Faiths United to Oppose Gun Violence,” and the Islamic group signed onto the Brady Center’s “Faith” group letter to Reid demanding he block the legislation.

infidels-coexist-not_thumb

This is not the first time that ISNA and the Brady Center have united to oppose the Second Amendment.

As noted by The Truth About Guns in February 2011, ISNA was one of the original founding groups of the “Faiths United to Oppose Gun Violence” when it was rolled out by the Brady Center.

However, the Second Amendment is not the only constitutional freedom under assault by ISNA and its leaders. As reported by Neil Munro at the Daily Caller, a group of representatives from many of the Obama administration’s favored Islamist groups met with Tom Perez, the head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, and now nominee for Labor Secretary. During the meeting, the Muslim leaders, including those from ISNA, called for a redefinition of anti-discrimination laws to punish criticism of Islam.

Aziz’s advocacy was supported by a second Islamist advocate, Islamic Society of North America president Mohamed Magid. He argued that “teaching people that all Muslims are a threat to the country… is against the law and the Constitution.” Magid asked Perez to change the federal government’s rules governing terror investigations, for more private meetings with top justice department officials, for the reeducation of FBI agents, and for more people to oppose criticism of Islam, which he labelled “religious bigotry and hate.”

According to the Daily Caller, when the meeting was finished Perez jumped on the stage to embrace Magid. Islam is a threat to the country. To say that it is against the law and the Constitution, meaning the First Amendment, and to use the protection of freedom of speech to bludgeon Magid’s perceived enemies demonstrates a profoundly perverse interpretation of the Constitution that should be rejected across the political spectrum.

Then again, there was a time when Magid himself and his organization were rejected. Back in June 2007, during the first round of the Holy Land Foundation trial, then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales cancelled a Justice Department outreach event because of, according to Newsweek, Magid’s planned presence at the meeting as a representative of ISNA. The federal prosecutors in the Holy Land Foundation case had just weeks before named ISNA as an unindicted co-conspirator.

In a related court order by the federal judge hearing the case, which was later unsealed, Judge Jorge Solis ruled:

that there was “ample evidence” that ISNA and other U.S. Islamic groups had acted in support of Hamas.

The Obama administration came under fire at the time of inaugural in January 2009 because one of the leaders at the National Prayer Service was then-ISNA president Ingrid Mattson. And yet the Obama administration continues to work with ISNA, granting the organization the highest level of access. In February, ISNA leaders were included in a closed door meeting with FBI Director Robert Mueller where they demanded a purge of the bureau’s counterterrorism training materials of anything or anyone they deemed “Islamophobic.” One of the pieces of items entered into evidence during the Holy Land Foundation trial was a strategic memo of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America that identified what their goal was in this country:

The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Process” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet.

At the end of that memo is a list of those organizations that the Muslim Brotherhood leadership identified as “ours.”

At the very top of the list was ISNA.

The Islamic Society of North America has a vision for America. And yet it isn’t one that treasures the protections on freedom recognized by the Constitution. Taking down the First and Second Amendments won’t be sufficient to realize ISNA’s Islamist vision. But for them, it’s a good start. .

Islam is America's number one threat. Every mosque in America is either supporting the ISNA and or CAIR? By failing to call out the Islamic attack on our 1st and 2nd amendment rights, along with other freedoms, I have to ask this question: Stewart are you an apologist for Islam? If not, then come out now and publicly stand against Islam which seeks to destroy our nation and absorb it into a Global Caliphate.

One organization that is clear about the threat of Islam is Gun Owners of America.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.