This past Friday, the President of the American College of Pediatricians, Dr. Michelle Cretella, ripped the Supreme Court's decision to force every state in America to allow sodomy-based "marriage." Dr. Cretella argues that, "[T]his is a tragic day for America's children. The SCOTUS has just undermined the single greatest pro-child institution in the history of mankind: the natural family. Just as it did in the joint Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton decisions, the SCOTUS has elevated and enshrined the wants of adults over the needs of children."
At their website, the College has posted a wealth of information and scientific evidence that same-sex "marriage" is destructive to children and that children do best in natural families. In April, the College posted the following press release to their website, urging the Supreme Court to protect America's children.
The American College of Pediatricians urges the Supreme Court of the United States to consider the well-being of children in the case before them this week to legalize same-sex marriage. While the debate over the legitimacy of same-sex "marriage" can be viewed from many perspectives, there should be little debate about the effects it has upon children: Same-sex "marriage" deliberately deprives the child of a mother or a father, and is therefore detrimental. The College advocates for children in this debate from an objective position grounded in scientific evidence.
President, Michelle Cretella, states, "The court must understand the gravity of their decision in its impact upon children around the world. Every child needs a mother and a father. Same-sex marriage directly disenfranchises children of this right."
There is unequivocal evidence of the fundamental value of the married, father-mother family unit to the optimal development of the child. For more information, including a link to the Amicus Brief filed with the Supreme Court, visit the Same-Sex "Marriage" page on the College website.
The College joined an amici brief in the recently decided Obergefell v. Hodges case; in their brief they recounted that there is sound scientific research to defend traditional marriage while trying to discourage sodomy-based "marriage."
Despite being certified by almost all major social science scholarly associations—indeed, in part because of this—the alleged scientific consensus that having two parents of the same-sex is innocuous for child well-being is almost wholly without basis. All but a handful of the studies cited in support draw on small, non-random samples which cannot be extrapolated to the same-sex population at large. This limitation is repeatedly acknowledged in scientific meetings and journals, but ignored when asserted as settled findings in public or judicial advocacy.
You could say that the science on same-sex "marriage is settled,"… but you know those anti-science liberals -- they're always so narrowminded.