Do you believe that you know precisely what happened on 9/11/2001?  Are you absolutely certain that you know the truth?  If so, what you are about to see might shake you up quite a bit.  The events that happened 12 years ago on this day shocked the world and will certainly never be forgotten.  Thousands of innocent people died needlessly, and that day fundamentally changed the course of history.  But what if it could be proven that the "official story" that the government has been telling us about 9/11 is a lie?  Are you willing to use logic and reason to evaluate new evidence that has emerged, or do you have such an emotional attachment to your current beliefs that you are going to blindly believe whatever the government tells you to believe?  In this day and age, it is absolutely imperative that we all learn to think for ourselves.  For the next few minutes, please be very skeptical as you read the rest of this article.  Be skeptical of what I am claiming, be skeptical of what the experts are claiming and be skeptical of what the government is claiming.  Evaluate the evidence for yourself and come to your own conclusions.

More than 2,000 architects and engineers are supporting a massive worldwide advertising campaign entitled ReThink911.  You can find the official website right here.  According to these architects and engineers, the government's version of what happened on 9/11/2001 is absolutely impossible.

And it turns out that an increasing percentage of the American population is agreeing with them.  The following is an excerpt from a ReThink911 press release about new polling that has just been released…

On the 12th anniversary of 9/11, a new national survey by the polling firm YouGov reveals that one in two Americans have doubts about the government's account of 9/11, and after viewing video footage of World Trade Center Building 7's collapse, 46% suspect that it was caused by a controlled demolition. Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, collapsed into its own footprint late in the afternoon on 9/11.

The poll was sponsored by ReThink911, a global public awareness campaign launched on September 1. The campaign includes a 54-foot billboard in Times Square and a variety of transit and outdoor advertising in 11 other cities, all posing the question, "Did you know a third tower fell on 9/11?"

Among the poll's findings:

  • 38% of Americans have some doubts about the official account of 9/11, 10% do not believe it at all, and 12% are unsure about it;
  • 46%, nearly one in two, are not aware that a third tower collapsed on 9/11. Of those who are aware of Building 7's collapse, only 19% know the building's name;
  • After seeing video footage of Building 7′s collapse:
    • 46% are sure or suspect it was caused by controlled demolition, compared to 28% who are sure or suspect fires caused it, and 27% who don't know;
    • By a margin of nearly two to one, 41% support a new investigation of Building 7′s collapse, compared to 21% who oppose it.

Even though Americans have been hearing about 9/11 endlessly for the past 12 years, nearly half of them still don't know that a third building fell on that day.  A 47-story building named "Building 7″ collapsed perfectly into its own footprint at freefall speed, but no plane ever hit it.

So why did it fall?

The following is the official ReThink911 video about Building 7…

And of course the collapse of the other two World Trade Center towers would have been impossible as well without the help of controlled demolition.

But for many Americans, the implications of accepting that reality would just be too painful to accept.  It would mean that someone wired those buildings for controlled demolition ahead of time, and for many very patriotic Americans such a notion is absolutely unthinkable.

However, we owe it to future generations of Americans to put our emotions aside and to search out the truth.  Whoever was responsible for the events of 9/11 needs to be brought to justice, no matter who they might be.

And the families of those that were killed on that day deserve to know exactly what happened and why it happened.  The following is an excerpt from a great editorial by Dennis Maley in the Bradenton Times

For too long, government officials have been able to successfully leverage the emotional components of the tragedy to deflect questions they painted as either disrespectful to the victims and their families or crackpot conspiracies. But with over 2,000 architects and engineers having signed the 9/11 truth petition, most of whom have offered credible and detailed reasons why their expertise has left them at odds with root elements of the official version of events, there remain too many unanswered questions for us to continue to ignore those raising them.

Perhaps the most noted event of that day, in terms of skepticism, is the implausible "collapse" of building seven, the third tower to fall, which reached free-fall speeds and fell in its own footprint in the way that a controlled demolition does – despite the fact that it was not hit by a plane. Building seven's improbable collapse was not explained by the 9/11 Commission and has been routinely described by demolition experts as something which could have only occurred through a well-planned, coordinated demolition, aided by pre-placed explosives.

The two main towers also fell at near free-fall speeds, with concrete floors being pulverized to dust almost immediately (before the required force would be present) while the necessary deceleration that would be needed to generate the force to continuously penetrate each floor below was obviously absent. Quite simply, a building of that size and structural integrity would not seem capable of falling at such speed, while simultaneously expelling such tremendous energy in obliterating each floor – which was nearly 4-ft. thick and topped with 4 inches of poured concrete above and lined with interlocking steel trusses beneath.

The documented phenomenon of extreme-high temperatures at the twin tower sites, which inexplicably reached levels capable of melting iron and structural steel when a normal open air fire is not capable of reaching such ranges, also warrants a closer look, as does eyewitness accounts of "molten metal." Iron-laden spheres in residual dust at the site that suggest temperatures had to reach more than 2,700 degrees fahrenheit (the melting point of iron and structural steel) is also suspect. The use of thermite would be one possible explanation, though the pyrotechnic compound was not tested for at the site, a standard protocol when investigating such an explosion.

Why are so many Americans still so resistant to asking such hard questions?

Shouldn't we allow the evidence to lead us to the truth instead of allowing the government to define what the truth is for us?

Posted below is video from investigative reporter Ben Swann asking some more questions about the collapse of Building 7…

Why aren't there more reporters out there like Ben Swann?

Today, we live in a society where certain kinds of questions are considered to be "off limits".  But that should not be the case.  As Americans, we should all be "truth seekers".

After all, the truth will set us free, right?

But wait a minute, wasn't al-Qaeda supposed to be behind 9/11?  Wasn't that the reason why we have been chasing them around the Middle East for over a decade?

Well, these days the U.S. government is actually allied with al-Qaeda.  The Obama administration has been supplying Syrian rebel groups that are openly affiliated with al-Qaeda with weapons and supplies even though they are slaughtering Christiansusing chemical weapons and dismembering little girls.

And now Obama is telling us that we need the U.S. military to get directly involved in the civil war in Syria so that we can help al-Qaeda take over Syria and set up a radical jihadist Sunni government in that nation.  The following is an excerpt from a recent article by Paul Joseph Watson

The Obama administration's insistence that the United States intervene militarily on the side of Syrian rebels, who are being led by Al-Qaeda affiliate Jabhat al-Nusra, which the report states is the "most effective fighting force in Syria," has led to charges by the likes of Senator Ted Cruz that the White House is acting as "Al-Qaeda's Air Force."

The BPC report also warns that chemical weapons falling into the hands of jihadists in Syria could subsequently be used against the west.

"Potential jihadi access to the vast stockpile of chemical weapons assembled by the Assad regime and scattered across Syria is a potential game-changer though—not only because they could be used there, but because they could be smuggled out of the country as well," states the report.

The report highlights how Jabhat al-Nusra is under the control of Al-Qaeda leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri, who "personally intervened to settle a dispute between Jabhat al-Nusra and al-Qaeda in Iraq….and declared the Syrian group to be under his direction."

If you doubt any of this, just watch the video posted below.  It shows Syrian rebels singing a victory song about the destruction of the World Trade Center towers, praising Osama bin Laden, and calling him their leader…

Does that video make you angry?

It should.

12 years after 9/11, the U.S. government is allied with the very forces that supposedly conducted the terror attacks in the first place.

Something does not add up here.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter. You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.