Russia And China Prepare For The Day When They Will Nuke The US


While Barack Obama is busy gutting the U.S. nuclear arsenal, Russia and China are rapidly preparing for the day when they will nuke the United States.  To most Americans, it sounds very strange to hear that Russia and China are concerned about nuclear war.  After all, isn't the Cold War over?  Isn't that what politicians from both major political parties keep telling us?  Unfortunately, the truth is that Russia and China both consider the United States to be their number one geopolitical threat, and both nations have been systematically strengthening and updating their strategic forces.  At the end of last month, Russia held a large-scale military drill that involved the launch of four nuclear missiles, and the Chinese government released a major report for the public which included maps showing what would happen to major U.S. cities in the event of a nuclear attack by Chinese submarines.  Obama may blindly believe that wishful thinking and unilateral disarmament will keep the United States safe, but Russia and China are taking a much different path.  China-Nuclear-Attack-Against-The-United-StatesBoth of them believe that a military conflict with the United States in the future is quite likely, and they are rapidly preparing for that eventuality.

The major nuclear drill conducted by Russia at the end of last month made headlines all over the planet…

Russian strategic forces carried out a large-scale surprise military drill on Wednesday, launching four nuclear missiles that were closely monitored by U.S. intelligence agencies, U.S. officials said.

The drill began around 9:00 am ET and included the test launch of two land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and two submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs).

But this was far from an isolated incident.  In fact, it has been reported that Russian missile forces will hold more than 200 drills during the second half of 2013.

Things have very much changed in Russia since the end of the Cold War era.  Back then, Russia did not have a lot of money to put into the military.  But now Russian President Vladimir Putin is working very hard to strengthen and modernize Russian nuclear forces…

Russia is developing several new missiles, including a weapon U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed as a covert intermediate-range nuclear missile called the RS-26 that is being developed and tested in apparent violation of the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty.

The Russian government has denied the RS-26 violates the INF treaty and claims it is a new ICBM, which some arms compliance experts say is a violation of the 2010 New START treaty.

Russia is also developing a new submarine-launched ballistic missile and a new class of missile submarines.

The missile submarines are of particular concern.  Russia has introduced a new "near silent" nuclear submarine which is far quieter than anything the U.S. currently has…

The Borey Class submarine, dubbed Vladimir Monomakh, has a next generation nuclear reactor, can dive deeper than 1,200 feet, and carries up to 20 nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM).

Each of these "Bulava" ICBM's can carry ten detachable MIRV warheads, what they call "re-entry vehicles," capable of delivering 150 kiloton yields per warhead.

These subs have the capability of approaching the coastline of the United States without us ever even knowing that they were there.

Most Americans do not realize this.

Most Americans also do not realize that Russia has more spies inside the United States today than it did at any point during the Cold War.

Russia is more of a threat to the United States today than it ever has been before, but the American people are completely and totally oblivious to this.

Meanwhile, China is publicly bragging about what their nuclear submarines could do to us.

Late last month, the Chinese government released a report which included maps which showed the projected results of a nuclear strike on major U.S. cities.  This report was heavily covered by government-controlled media outlets in China such as China Central TV, the People's Daily, the Global Times, the PLA Daily and China Youth Daily.

The following are a couple of excerpts from that report…

"If we launch our DF-31A ICBMs over the North Pole, we can easily destroy a whole list of metropolises on the East Coast and the New England region of the U.S., including Annapolis, Philadelphia, New York, Boston, Portland, Baltimore, and Norfolk, whose population account accounts for about one eighth of America's total residents."

—–

"Because the Midwest states of the U.S. are sparsely populated, in order to increase the lethality, [our] nuclear attacks should mainly target the key cities on the West Coast of the United States, such as Seattle, Los Angles, San Francisco, and San Diego."

In recent years, China has been working hard to develop a new generation of inter-continental and submarine-launched nuclear missiles.  The following is from a recent article posted on the Washington Free Beacon

China is rapidly expanding its nuclear forces with new missiles, submarines, and warheads. At least one of the warheads is based on warhead designs stolen from U.S. nuclear weapons laboratories in the 1990s, U.S. officials have said.

The submarine-launched missiles that they have been developing are of particular concern.  The following is from a recent article posted on Investors.com

China's sub fleet is reportedly the world's second-largest, with about 70 vessels. About 10 are nuclear-powered, and four or more of those are nuclear ballistic submarines.

In 2010, the Type 094 Jin class entered the service. It is capable of launching 12 to 16 JL-2 missiles with a range of about 8,700 miles, covering much of the continental U.S. with single or multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicle warheads.

Do you remember a few years ago when a Chinese submarine fired a test missile from just off the west coast of the United States?

The U.S. Navy did not even know that the sub was there.  If that missile had been fired directly at Los Angeles, it would have been incinerated long before the U.S. government could ever have responded.

Are you starting to get the picture?

In response, the Obama administration will not even comment on this latest Chinese report…

The Obama administration declined to comment on Sunday on provocative state-run Chinese media reports outlining Beijing's nuclear war plans, including land-based and submarine-launched missile strikes on U.S. cities that would kill up to 12 million people.

State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf and Pentagon spokeswoman Cynthia Smith would not respond when asked about the highly unusual Chinese reports published Oct. 28 in numerous major Communist Party-controlled television and newspaper outlets.

The Chinese reports included maps showing nuclear strikes on Los Angeles and the Pacific Northwest, along with the resulting radiation plumes stretching thousands of miles across the western United States.

You see, the truth is that talking about what China is doing does not fit in with the Obama administration's "progressive agenda".  Obama has been systematically disarming America, and most Americans do not even realize that it has been happening.

Most Americans just continue to believe that we still have a very robust strategic nuclear deterrent.

Unfortunately, that is no longer the case.

Back in 1967, the U.S. military had more than 31,000 strategic nuclear warheads.

Since that time, the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal has been reduced by about 95 percent,

The START Treaty that Obama agreed to back in 2010 will limit both the United States and Russia to a maximum of 1,550 deployed strategic nuclear warheads.

But that is not nearly enough of a reduction for Obama.

Back in June, he declared that "after a comprehensive review" he has decided that the United States can reduce the number of our deployed nuclear warheads by another one-third…

After a comprehensive review, I've determined that we can ensure the security of America and our allies, and maintain a strong and credible strategic deterrent, while reducing our deployed strategic nuclear weapons by up to one-third.  And I intend to seek negotiated cuts with Russia to move beyond Cold War nuclear postures.

That would leave us with around 1,000 warheads.

And thanks to the various treaties that we have signed, Russia will know where most of those warheads are located.

So this makes a scenario in which Russia and China collectively conduct a first strike against the United States much more conceivable.  If Russia or China knows exactly where our warheads are, it would be very easy to take most of them out in less than 10 minutes with a submarine-based first strike.

Of course most Americans never even think about such things anymore, and our politicians certainly are not talking about them.

But Russia and China are thinking about these things, and they are rapidly preparing for the day when war comes and they choose to nuke us before we nuke them.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.






  • Daniel Jackson

    This is being done by design, the U.S. will eventually allow a nuclear attack on the USA in order to bring us under the rule of the united nations which then no constitution or bill of rights would exist anymore and out elite leaders would not be blamed like they would under different pretenses. our leaders behind the scenes are not dumb , reducing our nuclear arsenal, conflict with iran, this is all being done for a reason

  • pduffy

    Another 'boogie man' that will make the people trust in the industrialized military complex to save their skins. This kind of talk is designed to get the sheeple to increase funding of the Pentagon, which is run by demons.

    Furthermore, if anybody launches nukes, it is most likely to be Barry Soetoro (AKA Barak Obama), and the target could be the USA itself. What better way to increase the power of the beast but to nuke a few key cities, and then blame it on the Russians or Chinese? The ULTIMATE FALSE FLAG!

  • Badkarma060

    Not to worry Obama has drawn a red line...

  • http://miraclesignsanddesigns.com Paul Wesley Miracle

    Do you honestly think that Obama got "rid" of these nuclear missiles? More like he wanted to mark them off the books in order to sell or give to his extremists buddies.

  • Que Dub

    Now, now, now china !!! Who will buy all that 5H1T ya send over here if ya nuke us??

  • Ratbite

    I sincerly believe that Barrack Hussein Obama would joyfully push ther button launching the missiles to destroy the United States of America.

  • jerry1944

    Well one thing for sure obambo is sure plucking us for them to make it easy

  • texrollie

    Maranatha! The Prince of Peace is coming soon!

  • catman

    Maybe we can hope that the first one over the north pole takes out the district of corruption.

  • SIRWIZARD

    Don't worry. Mr. Obama plans further deterioration of the U.S. Military and Nuclear Forces. That way, no one will suspect a thing until the really bright flash.

    We used to have a very competent and credible nuclear deterrence and I was proud to be a part of it. We had THOUSANDS of warheads, ready to go at an instant's notice. Now, thanks to Mr. Obama, we have fewer than 250. Is this treason or incompetence? An attack from within? History will decide...IF WE SURVIVE. Another comforting thought...Mr. Obama is planning to relax our sanctions against Iran to see if they'll stop their Nuclear Weapons program. That likely means Iran will soon join the nuclear threat against us. They have been rehearsing an EMP attack. If that happens, there'll be no bright flash, no mushroom cloud, perhaps only a strange green glow high in the air for a moment. Then, your car will stall...permanently. Everyone's will. The power grid will fail. For a year or so. Deliveries will stop. No food, no medicine. MILLIONS will die. China will invade the west coast under the guise of "humanitarian Relief". They won't leave when we get back on our feet. We'll have to throw them out. Russia may do the same on the east coast. Now. Feel better about Mr. Obama? What a hero. Aren't you glad you elected this liar? DEFCON 2. Prepare. It's going to get a lot worse before it gets better

  • Douglas W. Rodrigues

    In the event of any type of nuclear attack, the whole world would enter another ice age, and everyone would die. Maybe the Chinese and Russians haven't accepted that fact yet?

  • javadog

    I heard a discussion recently of the devastation just ONE of those subs could do just from the Gulf of Mexico. Throw EMP weapons into the mix and the damage would be beyond catastrophic.

  • $2398599

    Since we are now such a WUSS , economical joke of a country, we are certainly no threat to anyone. So why should China and Russia be out to kill us?

    • LittleRoot_48

      Why destroy our country and all its resources, when all they have to do is invade us and take over? Our military is being wussified and our great military leaders are being canned by the most corrupt president in US history. He's making it very easy for Russia or China to take over. I believe that has been his intent all along.

    • http://miraclesignsanddesigns.com Paul Wesley Miracle

      It's probably defensive, our leaders tried to take us to WW 3 not even 2 months ago. No duh Russia and China are now flexing their muscles. They are doing it to wake American people up, so that we know that they aren't going to be an easy target. I don't think any major power wants war these days, besides us. I mean any rational person can see that the damage will not be worth the gain. Even if you do win, everything gets nuked, everything is destroyed, and then you have to worry about radiation.

      Our government has been bullying the rest of the world for a long time, they are getting tired of it, and they should. Their is a oil war going on right now in the middle east, and we are losing it. (lets ignore the fact we shouldn't be there to begin with) But they know that our government will do anything to keep it's status as the world leader, or the world's currency holder, which all relies on oil. Russia's pipe line is circumventing that and most countries will soon move away from the US dollar. But if our mafia of a government can stop the spread of oil to other countries without using US dollars, then they can hold out for a bit longer. The Syria threat is still real, and is still happening. We almost went to war with them not only a few months ago, a lot of people seem to forget that.

  • Honorary

    It is a good article Mr. Snyder even I disagree with your article, China will never wedge war with the USA because the US owed them over trillion dollars, they will prefer to collect their investment in the form of interests, confiscated properties, etc. its much better to nuke the USA for what? then lost all the money, I don't think so.
    History had taught the Chinese that they had been conquered by the British for two opium wars, had to pay the Brits over 100 million pounds for losing the wars, lost Hong Kong for 99 years, Japan had came and raped Nanjing, etc. China will not let the history be repeated it again. China just follows the instinct of the old Asian adage: "If you want peace -you have to ready for war." Can you blame China for trying to protect her country.???
    Since mid April, the Chinese government said the increased US military presence in the Asia Pacific region causes a lot of tension, and they plan to send more miitary forces and strengthen their partnerships with neighboring countries.
    According to experts, due to the economic interdependence between the two countries, "Beijing will probably preven the use of milirary force and not cause an armed conflict. In order to try to expel Washington from the region."
    Mr. Snyder should tell the Nobel Peace laurette - obama to mind the country's economic, racial division, debt ceiling, etc rather than try to wedge war and support the Muslim terrorists.
    America had over 243 wars, it considered our Republic had more wars than annually since the country had been established.

    • ChristCrusader

      Which is better, to own the US, or to eliminate the US once 0bama finishes raping it, and then to own the world, and come back and rape the land of its resources?

    • Honorary

      Come on! you know that neither of them good. Don't worry, Christ is our Crusade, we're going to be all right with the comments of many good citizens and patriots on this bloc, we will be baaaack...
      "A nation can suffer its fools but cannot survive the traiter." Cicero

    • Des Malone

      jeezus is imaginary - people who live in reality

    • Des Malone

      They can flex their might when the US is engaging in a total economic collapse motivating China, Russia and other nations to make their own trade agreements and "de Americanize" the world reserve currency. US will try to threaten and bully and impose sanctions, and throw a tantrum but can't actually do anything about it...I think the nuke talk is muscle flexing. Nobody's stupid enough to destroy the globe filling it with perpetual radiation...China & Russia know if they have more nukes to bring to the table, the US can't threaten them out of taking out the middle man in the world's economy.

      The war China wins will be the economic war at the end of the day. They've surpassed us in the major areas. Like the other poster said, but still very much truth there, China is far too invested in this country, from commercial enterprise to land share and industry holdings to set off a nuke and destroy it - it'd cost all their gold to replenish an irradiated wasteland.

      They got the right idea - it's a predator prey market...if they out produce, out maneuver, out import, out export, out educate, and out perform the US, they win while Americans waddle around in a complacent, dumbed down, uneducated, illiterate stupor, hollering "We're Number One!" that is as obnoxious as "San Dimas Highschool Football Rules!!

  • slickzip

    When I was a young I always hit first

  • ChristCrusader

    This article is ominous enough without even mentioning North Korea, Iran, terrorist efforts, or 0bama himself while he's on an overseas "damn America" tour.

    fyi, Rev 17 & 18 sounds an awful lot like Washington, DC as the great city Babylon being destroyed by a nuclear attack.

  • dragonfFIRE01

    so what the world needs to start over anyway.

    • cleo707

      You folks need to wake up a EMP over USA would kill 90% of US population in a year. Russia and China would walk in. end game for the USA

    • Des Malone

      Walk in and do what? EMP fries everything. They'd be at an enormous disadvantage when they destroyed resources that would've otherwise made invasion and conquering easy. Nothing would work. After they attempted to dismantle the military, they'd have to deal with the people.

    • cleo707

      Resources would not be destroyed people would be and their electrical equipment didn't get fried, ours did. For those who say China wouldn't attack us think of this. Short term pain for long term gain!! The land is all theirs, new territory for the taking.

  • JBQ21

    This is really bad news for a Navy vet with 4 years of shipboard service. Nevertheless, the U.S. is deteriorating morally so quickly that an outside intervention used by God is actually inevitable.

  • Harold

    Thanks to Obamination!

  • Suzanne

    I have considered for sometime learning a foreign language, but couldn't decide what I wanted to learn. Maybe I should choose Russian or Chinese should this occur and I survive.
    Russia and China are becoming more of a threat to the US because of our impotent, incompetent and totally foolish government leaders. Disarming the US while Russia and China increase their armaments is like bringing a knife to a gun fight; these two powers know this. The US has no more deterrence against invasion. Russia and China will probably argue over how the US will be divided.
    When adding the loss of morality to this mix along with our crippled economy, which is on the brink of implosion, it is easy to see the US as ripe for the pickings.

    • JBQ21

      Actually, you may consider learning Farsi first. Valerie Jarrett is starting a class in DC. Iran may get here first.

    • Dominus_Venturae

      Learn Mandarin its easy. I haven't spent much time with Farsi but remember it was easier than Arabic for some reason. It'll still be difficult because you need to hear each word first because they don't write vowels. Russian is a little hard if you haven't learned cases from other languages like Latin or German, but it's easy in the sense that once you learn the alphabet you can read almost all of it. The best thing you can do in learning is a language is starting to learn now. Like every second you think about it whip up an app or open a movie. Learning requires a lot of time and motivation. So start now! Start with Mandarin.

    • JBQ21

      Actually, I love languages which is semantics. I would love to learn Russian. The alphabet is different. I have six years of Latin, three years of Greek, and 1 and one half years of French. I have been exploring this possibility.

    • Dominus_Venturae

      Sweet! Languages are the best. I have been learning for the past year Latin, Spanish, French, Arabic, Mandarin, and German. I every once in awhile study Greek, Russian, Swahili, Japanese, Hebrew, and Korean. Youtube is full of videos on each one. Glad I live in this time! Learning is too easy now and best of all its free! Best of luck on your journey.

      PS You should go on google books because they have the scanned thousands of Latin works all free to. You might be able to get job translating them!