Lady Parts Justice - Lesbians Feminists Hold Comedy Pro-Abortion Fundraising Telethon


Last night, the pro-abortion group "Lady Parts Justice" held an online streaming comedy telethon, to raise money to promote, and pay for, the killing of the unborn in the Lone Star State. Telethon participants were "invited to laugh and feel powerful" as they joined millions of American women "revitalizing an unstoppable movement standing up for reproductive rights."

You can find a Daily Beast article---praising this telethon---written by Sally Kohn a lesbian activist and Fox News contributor here.

lady partsThe theme for last night's macabre internet gathering---sponsored by NARAL Pro-choice America and the New York Abortion Access Fund (NYAAF) ---was "Clear Eyes Full Hearts Can Choose." The host organization, "Lady Parts Justice" was proud to team up with these New York based abortion rights charities to host what they characterized as a "hastily planned but totally heartfelt variety show," held in a NYC basement, "to raise money for Texas women in need."

After looking at their web page, I was left with the distinct impression men were not welcome at this telethon. The page stated something about men being "pervs" always looking to get lucky. I cannot imagine how desperate a man would have to be to hope to get lucky at a gathering of New York lesbians and feminists.

To be short, a Texas law restricting abortion to the first 21 weeks of pregnancy (a reduction from 24 weeks) and another law requiring Texas doctors performing abortions to have local hospital admitting privileges offends these Lesbian/feminists groups. They also take issue with the rising cost and decreasing availability of safe abortion procedures.

I researched Texas Abortion services. You may be surprised to find abortion is relatively cheap in Texas (starting at $295) and abortion costs rise with length of pregnancy. Apparently, the older the baby the more complicated and expensive it becomes to tear it from its mother's womb. Moreover, after 15 weeks, special procedures are required and in many cases, brief hospitalization has always been required for late term procedures. You can find a link to a licensed Texas abortion provider and associated fees here.

In support of their efforts to lower the costs of extinguishing innocent lives, the "Lady Parts Justice" webpage claims the following:

"Women are not faking rape and they don't have magical powers to deactivate rape sperm. We are not pregnant before we are pregnant, we can't have an abortion if we are not pregnant, and I think we can all agree, women shouldn't be forced to carry stillborn babies. Abortion don't cause mental instability and the HPV vaccine doesn't make girls mentally retarded. No women's boss should be able to demand information from her to decide if her reason for wanting birth control is moral enough to grant permission."

After my head stopped spinning, I tried, but I have not been able to locate any studies or statistics that remotely suggest that lesbian rape by heterosexual males is at epidemic levels in American society. It is also common knowledge that an obscene plurality of abortions performed in America involve pregnant heterosexual females involved in consensual heterosexual relationships.

Given the lesbian communities obvious and proud disgust for men, I am having difficulty grasping lesbian activists' passionate desires for birth control---they do not need---and abortion services they rarely, if ever, require.

It has been said that you can judge a society by how it treats its youth and its elderly. I agree. Given the callous act of America's lesbian feminists---the holding of comedy internet telethons to raise money for killing of the unborn---what is America to conclude about the behavior of our minority Lesbian community?

In 1973, after experiencing substantial pressure from the "Gay Liberation Front," the American Psychiatric Association (APA) removed homosexuality as a mental disorder from the APA Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.

As a consequence of that decision, today lesbian activism promotes the killing of unborn babies to further their adopted and absurd cause, "comprehensive reproductive justice." Looking back, perchance the APA decision to remove homosexuality from its list of mental disorders was flawed after all.

Something is very wrong with a society when we condone using laughter to raise money to end a child's life.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.






Comments

comments

  • mary

    A COMEDY TELETHON PUT ON BY A BUNCH OF WOMEN WANTING TO BE MEN. AND BECAUSE KILLING THE UNBORN IS SOOOOOOOOO FUNNY TO THESE TYPES OF SICKOS!!!!

    • heygirlhey

      The only thing that is funny here is: the way you type, and the fact that you don't understand a basic difference between gender expression and sexual orientation. Please review your topics before you make an attempt to comment at them, failure to do so can show that you are uneducated in the topic and show that you are a biased reader.

    • mary

      The way I type? And you're the one that needs to re-read the article. (in lay terms for you) The article states that's lesbians are are putting on a skit to raise money for abortions!!!!! Obviously, you're the illiterate one here! Or maybe you just thinks it's hilarious that lesbians LIKE to kill the unborn!!!! ENJOY YOUR SICKO SHOW!!!!

    • heygirlhey

      No, you still don't understand the difference between sexual orientation and gender expression.

    • mary

      And you....the libtard that you are, have no clue what the rest of the moral and decent people mean by "MURDERING OF THE UNBORN, INNOCENT BABIES".

    • heygirlhey

      This isn't the argument I'm making, stop detracting.

  • chamuiel

    Yes, they are some very sick people.

  • ch2801

    Reproductive rights?.? To reproduce=make a copy of. And they want the right to murder that reproduction!

    • heygirlhey

      Do you oppose in-vitro fertilization?

    • ch2801

      No

    • heygirlhey

      Then according to your ideals, you're a murderer and child killer.

    • John DeMayo

      Again thesepeopleiswear, what if someone opposes in-vitro? What then?

    • Avenger

      Quit trying to sound like you have some profound point to make with your stupid in-vitro fertilization question. You are not a 'deep thinker' or even an original one. You spout off the catchy phrases you were indoctrinated with and think that makes you smart ... you don't have the ability to think for yourself and are resigned to voice stupid clichés that you've been taught are 'powerful'. There is no disconnect in being for in-vitro fertilization and for the death penalty and against abortion. Abortion is murder while the other two are not.

    • John DeMayo

      Arguing morality with the morally bankrupt. Why bother?

    • Avenger

      heh heh .. good point...

    • heygirlhey

      There is no biological difference between the zygote that is inside of a woman's uterus, or the zygotes that are created inside of a test-tube. The problem is, you people all think that life begins at conception. Well what you see is, typically in in-vitro fertilization, they make more than one zygote to increase the chances of implantation. Well what do they do with the one's that are leftover? They simply throw them away, you conservatives try to fight a point and you can't even find the whole problem with it. What it shows is that you simply see one fact, deal with it, and dismiss any type of information against your argument.

    • John DeMayo

      And what if one opposes in-vitro? What then?

    • heygirlhey

      Nothing happens, I'm just proving a point that all conservatives only care about what women do to their bodies.

    • John DeMayo

      I would add, the above article makes a different point and asks a different question. Why do lesbians care so much about heterosexual women's abortion and birth control? After all they do not require birth control or abortion as they do not accidentally conceive children. Perhaps you would care to share your thoughts on the articles topic.

    • heygirlhey

      Perhaps you would like to maybe make an attempt to look at the wonderful advances that science and technology have made in the past few years. Maybe the fact that lesbian women are still, oh wait they're women! They care about their fellow women, no matter their orientation or assigned gender. What you seem to not understand is that there are women who always have to take birth control to control their hormonal cycle, this includes women who have overactive glands in their body, or endometriosis. (You may want to look that one up.) It does not matter there sexual orientation, women who are born as women, can still conceive. What you lack is the basic knowledge of surrogate mothers and in-vitro fertilization. Doing this takes the "actual sexual experience" out of the equation, but what still remains is gametes, necessary for reproduction. Do 13 year old women not require birth control? Or are you one of the archaic thinkers that only believe that birth control is used by women who are "promiscuous" or avoiding pregnancy. You must remember that although I am a homosexual cisgendered male, it does not mean that I am not concerned about heterosexual men. There is no difference.
      The point I am trying to make is, that sexual orientation is orientation, it has no bearing on that person, besides the fact they will choose people who are of the same-gender, different-gender or gender-queer individuals.

    • Avenger

      Sure there is a difference ... the zygote in the 'test tube' cannot develop fully and will die if not implanted.

    • heygirlhey

      Does it still contain 46 chromosomes, please tell me what the biological difference is, the biological community would love to know?

    • Avenger

      The 'biological community' already knows ... it has 23 pairs of potentially viable chromosomes ...

    • heygirlhey

      There is nothing catchy about the phrase in-vitro fertilization, it is a medical term, therefore there isn't another way to describe it. The reasons I am spouting this out is because I am a biochemistry major, and when you actually learn Anatomy and Physiology along with Growth and Development, you learn more about the body. Reproduction is one of our basic functions, and thanks to advances in science in-vitro fertilization has become a new way for women of all orientations to be fertilized and birth a child. I am not going to type any more, but I would like to ask a question, according to your answer I will follow-up with a un-biased response accordingly. The question is: When do you believe life starts at, conception? If not, please explain.

    • Avenger

      Of course human life begins at conception. Calling it 'a mass of protoplasm' overlooks the fact that it differs from every other cell in the woman's body and can be identified as human by its DNA ... so science supports the view that human life begins at conception.
      Before you say there's a moral dilemma involved with IVF and 'extra' embryos, keep in mind that all a physician can do is aid the natural process. The rates of congenital disease from IVF births (such as spinal bifida, cerebral palsy, heart defects, etc.) is higher than in coital reproduction. IVF success is NOT 100% ... only about 22% (higher or lower depending on age of the woman) of IVF reproduction result in live births ... most 'don't take'. Then there's the problem of thawing the frozen embryo ... dismal success rate. God/magic/bilogy - call it what you will - determines which embryo results in a live birth. As smart as we claim we are, we cannot control the outcome of IVF.
      The real ethical dilemma comes from IVF to grow embryos for the harvesting of stem cells (ESC)...causing human life for the purpose of killing it for its parts; especially when the only successful stem cell treatments to date have come from somatic adult induced pluripotent stem cells.
      There is a difference in meaning between killing and murder. From a biblical standpoint killing is OK, murder is not. Killing is a justified necessity for self defense, eating, and, doling out justice. Murder is the taking of viable innocent life and is never justified.

    • heygirlhey

      Look at you, someone did their homework. Actually, I have no problem with the supposed "moral dilemma" caused by IVF. I also do not care that IVF can be used to make ESC, because what would you do with the zygotes that are left over? Would you freeze them, would you save them for later? Who is to say that they are going survive the thawing process. Who is to say that each of those zygotes created will not actually carry in the womb anyway because of genetic defects. In my opinion, life does not begin at conception.

    • Avenger

      Suppose so .. ms microbiology, among other achievements...

    • heygirlhey

      Ah yes, nothing like having a biology and being in the Army. And you?

    • Avenger

      Served 6 years in Army SF as captain ... where you stationed?

    • heygirlhey

      Camp Casey.

    • Avenger

      S. Korea? Trained to speak Korean at DLI in Monterey. Spent 18 mos. in Korea, all over the place. Loved it.

    • heygirlhey

      Yup, did that.

    • Avenger

      You a linguist? Well ... sorry for thinking you just another dumbassed indoctrinated liberal ... my apologies.

    • heygirlhey

      I really don't care about political sides, I majored in Biology, the only thing I care about it science and language. No offense taken whatsoever, it's not like I write my life story eh?

  • Susan

    Sick and evil, female hating (and God-hating) immature people who reject Truth/Biology for using other humans in vile ways---and killing others. Really creepy people.

  • Joanne Epperson Deist

    Ugh ... disgusting excuses for human beings.

    • heygirlhey

      Disgusting excuse for hair, get your homophobic face out of here. No one wants to see it.

    • Avenger

      So we can see from your comments that you suffer the mental disorder of 'progressivism' , are a homo and have no meaningful information to offer ... it's gotta be really hard to be you.

    • heygirlhey

      Please read my comments below so you can understand that your thinking is not only flawed, that you are simply an ignorant conservative. Don't try with me, my life is wonderful, great job in the army and promising career in the future.

    • mary

      SHHHHHH...I don't think normal, brave and intelligent military personnel would appreciate knowing the likes of you is in the military...."don't ask, don't tell" wasn't talking talking about your mental capacity!!!!!

    • Joanne Epperson Deist

      When there is no valid argument, personal insults abound. You display a great amount of anger for someone claiming to have such a wonderful life. Be gay all you want. While I personally oppose it, and it is my right, my disgust is aimed at individuals that have blatant disregard for human life merely because it is an inconvenience.

    • heygirlhey

      Isn't that what conservatives to do people who are gay or a minority?
      Oh, you'll never admit that, you will give more rights to a fetus than you will a LGBT person

    • Joanne Epperson Deist

      What do conservatives to do gay or minorities? I don't judge anyone, even if you kill a defenseless baby. I leave the judging to God, but I do have opinions and I am entitled to them. That's your first problem, you lump everyone together. I've never stated what my political views are, you just assumed, another problem you apparently have.

    • heygirlhey

      If you are on this website you are a conservative, and they want to prevent us from: working, adopting, getting a civil union, having visitation rights in the hospital, and they tried to keep us out of the military.

    • Joanne Epperson Deist

      Again you ASSUMED! Don't you learn? I am a friend of the author, THAT IS WHY I AM ON THIS WEBSITE. But aside from that, unlike you apparently, I go to liberal websites as well because I prefer to learn the information (both sides) for myself, not be spoon fed information by anyone (unlike you apparently). Your more than obvious reason for being here is trolling.

    • heygirlhey

      Nah, my job here is to try to get the sides of both stories and to educate others, if people sit here and they try to claim that they are pro-life, then they should probably look at the whole case. People only care about abortion for one reason, that's because they believe that they are murdering. But no one bats an eye when they throw away 8 zygotes, the same zygotes that you all say is human life. This is why I get frustrated, it's because it isn't about saving a human life, it's about rights. You can not fully support something without knowing the full scale, that is in my opinion a problem with today's society. You also said disgusting excuses for human beings, well my interpretation of that can be taken three ways. You despise them because they are homosexual, you despise them because they are pro-choice (not pro-abortion please learn the difference) or simply all the reasons above. Therefore, one can infer, that you disagree with the above article to the point that you consider someone a " disgusting excuse", harsh words in my opinion. If you simply consider LGBT* women, who are pro-choice a "a disgusting excuse for a human" I would love for you to tell me about the corrupt government politicians and labor camps that are instilled in North Korea, China, and the war ravaged countries of Africa. You really need to put things in perspective.

    • Joanne Epperson Deist

      Again, you presume to know what I am aware of and how I feel about everything you brought up. Just sit here shaking my head at the arrogance that no one else can be as educated as you. I was addressing ONE aspect. So just take that high horse you rode in on and ride back on out. I'm done playing your game. I would prefer to have a conversation with an OPEN minded individual who does not presume to be the know all, end all.

    • heygirlhey

      You sit here and yet again you try to say that you want to have a conversation with an open-minded individual, I engaged you in conversation by saying that you may be wrong for these several reasons. I also told you why thinking that abortion was the only bad thing about reproduction is wrong, Yet you sit here and try to say that they are "disgusting examples?" You must remember to make a point get across well, you should probably make an attempt to remove your emotions from the argument, and also try not to over-exaggerate the point, you will bore your peers. I don't presume to know all, I can make inferences, you are on this website, you agree with this man, (who in his biography states that his forefronts are the constitution and conservatism), you agree with his statements by making hateful comments towards a group of people. There isn't a lot of room to think here, I can infer, that you therefore are either a republican, or you side with conservative thinking, this doesn't take a trained analyst to figure out.

    • heygirlhey

      I can get your political views just by reading your statement about lesbians who are pro-choice.

    • heygirlhey

      Conservatives believe that we have this so called gay agenda, which for one does not exist, secondly it is almost preposterous to have a way of thinking like that. Therefore, due to biased thinking and a dash of ignorance, the rights of a LGBT person is trampled upon while you instill more rights in the mass of cells that has hooked itself onto the womb of a woman.

    • mary

      What do conservatives to do gay or minorities? And you dare to correct someone else?
      The LGBT has a choice, the baby doesn't.......they're just murdered and tossed in the trash!!!!!

    • heygirlhey

      Just like you do with the LGBT community, oops.

    • mary

      Are you saying we murder them and throw them in the trash.....NOPE!!!! Just their gawdy pink tutu's!!!!!

    • heygirlhey

      No, transgender people are murdered everyday, and the lack of coverage surrounding this is terrible.

    • John DeMayo

      Thank you for your comments. I admire those of us with the courage to put a face to their thoughts and opinions.

  • Traditionist

    They look and are just like a bunch of mud hens.

  • Skepticles

    I notice that the author did not include in the article, any screen captures or jpegs of these lesbians in action. Thankfully.

    • heygirlhey

      I know right what a disgrace to see a group of human beings who aren't treated equally, what a shame.

  • Marcus Antonius

    I'm just surprised that these angry, men hating, lesbians didn't manage to somehow manage to link that all rapes against lesbian women were committed by "Bible-thumping, gun toting republican men out to "oppress" them. I have six words as to why I believe that the APA shouldn't have taken homosexuality off of that list of mental disorders : Harvey Milk , Dan Savage and Bradley Manning.

    • heygirlhey

      Lesbian is not synonymous with misandry.

  • Janna

    Nice work John. This was a disgusting event aimed at raising money for killing babies. And headlined by lesbians. How interesting. The irony is not lost here. This is society hitting the gutter. The celebration of death and debauchery in the name of "reproductive rights."

  • deeme

    That's ok go ahead and kill the greatest achievment you could ever have had. These people aren't just fooling themselves but fooling impressionable young girls into denying themselves an unconditional love. Nothing in my life , would of ever stopped me from having my children, and my first came at a bad time . I wouldn't of just deleted her but her three kids, the joy of our lives. How can anyone brag about such a thing, how can anyone feel that life moving inside of them and deny it the choice to life? If you put it up for adoption, you will never have regret. I have friends, who have a very hard time coping with their regret.

    • http://FreedomOutpost.com/ Tim Brown

      Amen!

    • heygirlhey

      Dear Tim Brown,
      Do you oppose in-vitro fertilization, do you think that is unnatural?

    • provemewrong

      WTF?? Aren't fertilization and abortion exactly opposite? I bet there are other websites that could use a wise commentator like you! Skeedaddle!

    • heygirlhey

      Actually according to your logic, if you oppose abortion you have to oppose ant-fertilization, but because most conservatives are lacking education in the biology field, they only care about what they see -pregnancy.

    • Avenger

      So what's "ant-fertilization"? Another know-nothing moron and useful-idiot for the left speaks ... with mentally-challenged people like you it's no wonder our country is in such sad shape...

    • heygirlhey

      Nah, I'm pretty sure I am not mentally-challenged, you are. And darn, I managed to spell wrong on the accident. My mistake.

    • Liberty for All

      I just bet you are proud of your highly refined commits . But fact is Killing is still killing regardless of what name you put on it . If it against the LAW to kill someone on the street it against the law of nature to kill someone in the womb .

    • heygirlhey

      You spelled comments wrong, just saying. But, I see your point, but you only care about one thing and that's the abortion. Tell me, when do you think life begins?

    • Jewely

      Well said.