The 2016 Presidential Candidate That No One is Talking About

There is a candidate lurking for a 2016 run that could change our nation’s history forever, and not in a good way. I am going to go on record with a prediction here and I honestly hope I end up with egg on my face.

It is my belief that a 3rd party candidate is being hand-picked and/or groomed as we speak. This is not just a normal 3rd party candidate that will get 1-2% of the vote. I believe this candidate will be more like Ross Perot and seriously complicate the election while guaranteeing that Hillary Clinton will become our next president.

mystery-man-HDIt’s time for a reality check. We need to look no further than the recent Virginia Governor’s race.

It was not necessarily the strength of McAuliffe that defeated Ken Cuccinelli. It was more the presence of a third party (Libertarian) candidate named Robert Sarvis, who was able to gain 6.5% of the popular vote. Most of those votes came from Cuccinelli and thus guaranteed a McAuliffe victory.

I do not fault Sarvis or the Libertarian Party for competing in this election and trying to win, but people need to understand that most third party votes will come from the GOP, at least until third party candidates from the hard left (Socialist Party, Communist Party, etc.) start to become more relevant.

OK, now here’s the point… Do you not think that the democrats know what happened in Virginia? Do you not think they took notes?

Do you not think that Hillary Clinton will use this same strategy to win an election in 2016?

Of course she will use it. Some say that she and Bill invented it.

The 2016 race is shaping up to be more than Clinton versus “To Be Announced” Republican. It is shaping up to be Clinton and some third party useful idiot versus that unnamed Republican. And that is a combination that is going to be difficult, if not IMPOSSIBLE, to beat.

I want to take you back to an article I wrote on October 24th, because within that article was an interview with Larry Nichols who was around during both of Bill Clinton’s presidential campaigns:

“Everybody thought Ross Perot was trying to win. As a matter of fact he got close to winning. Now all of the sudden he went crazy and kind of backed out and got back in. What people didn’t know is that he was put in as a ringer. Hillary was leading the charge for the health care program and Ross Perot had the computer contract, his company, for the health care program. Fortunately it didn’t get passed.”

That is a pretty bold statement coming from a former Clinton confidant. What we need to understand is that it doesn’t matter if Perot was a complicit “ringer” or just a guy who was trying to win an election. What matters is how he effected the election. He took enough votes from Bush Senior to put Wild Bill in office. That’s a fact.

Seeing as how the Clintons have benefited from this strategy before, don’t think that they will not go there again. Much of the controversy around Sarvis in Virginia is that it was democrats who were kicking in a large percentage of his campaign funds.

Why wouldn’t they?

It works.

Is is dirty? Yes.

Is it illegal? No.

I am an independent but a hard core conservative. I don’t bow to the GOP but when it comes time for elections you will see a lot of red on my ballot. I look at what happened in Virginia and look at the strong probability of Hillary Clinton being the democratic nominee in 2016 and it makes me nauseous.

She is nearly unbeatable and it’s not because of her virtues. It’s because her campaign will be run ten times more efficiently than Barack Obama’s ever was and probably 20 times better than recent GOP failures. These people have been there, done it and will do anything they have to do to win. Period.

It doesn’t matter what third party candidate emerges in 2016. The democrats will find a way to funnel money into that campaign and make the person more relevant than they ever should have been, just like one Robert Sarvis of Virginia.

Again, why wouldn’t they do it when it is proven to work?

This is why I am writing less and less about politics these days and more and more about personal freedoms and the need to stand up. My belief is that the fix is already in for 2016.

When people chant these catchy phrases like “by bullet or by ballot” I hope they mean it, because we might have to find out much sooner than you think.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

Print pagePDF pageEmail page



  • David

    Letting the RNC choose the candidate for you is going to be another disaster in the making. . .

  • David

    Stand with Rand 2016, the guy is out there getting his hands dirty with Detroit, which is more than can be said about the other 99 Senators. .

  • David

    Sarvis was not a Libertarian, he was a Progressive plant to take votes that would have otherwise went to Cuccinelli and Cuccinelli was also outspent by a huge margin.

  • Bonnie S

    re: "Most of those votes came from Cuccinelli and thus guaranteed a McAuliffe victory."

    Except that's not what the exit polls said.

  • js171

    I think Bush gets Georgia, Missouri, Nevada, and Kentucky without Perot. Clinton still gets 324 and demolishes Bush.

  • John Richard Walsh

    GOP is clueless about winning elections. They talk too much off campaign themes. Never run a third democrat leaning communist democrat as a third party candidate. lintons and Obama are communists yet got elected due to clueless GOP. Plus Obama is an illegal alien which GOP failed to exploit.

  • Richard Vandiamondsworth

    Sarvis was bankrolled by a taxocrat. We got a new word out of it, the fools who voted for him are lowinfotarians.

  • lotyuy

    Do not vote for lesser evils, the devil you know and the devil you don't should both be beaten, evicerated ,hung and summarily shot. Let the American people have their communism overnight and they will recoil in horror, let it slowly creep up over time and they will be indoctrinated. In the mean time, prepare for war. These morons forget it will take a mere 5% to set things right. We must rid ourselves of these ticks and leaches or die standing. I fear for my children's future, I do not want them to be slaves to the IRS as we are. Just remember to do what is just and lawful in the eyes of the constitution, it should be our guide. Democrats and Republicans are not evil people, they are ignorant of truth and history. We shouldn't turn against one another, we must hold accountable those who have betrayed the public trust, and those who have worked to dismantle it. We are all brothers and sister Americans, stand together. God bless you all.

  • maggiehunt

    The Democrats and Republicans were both behind this 3rd party "candidate" to leech votes away from Cuccinelli. People that vote for these decoys are their own worst enemy. Voting for a candidate with no chance of winning is playing right into the hands of the establishment. Do us all a favor in this country, stop whining about those "rotten politicians" when the candidate you knew had no chance of winning...loses, and wise up.

  • Marcus Antonius

    Whenever I hear someone say : I'm an 'independent' voter, what I hear is : "I'm too stupid to pick a side and whoever gives me the best line of bullsh@t , THAT'S who I'll vote for".

  • Jim Smith

    Republicans need to play the same game and back a big lib who is out for his self. There may be no problem anyway considering Obama's power grabs he may simply say after the election I refuse to leave I'm not done yet and besides I like the house and the food...

  • Hw00d

    remember this people, this vile women is a murdering tyrant, worse than Barry, she KILLS her own lawyers, lovers, and anybody else who tries to expose this evil redneck trailer park family. Chelsea is the love child of Webster Hubble, and this evil witch is complacent and in collusion w/ Barry and chinlessPrick Holder in the Benghazi lie.

  • Hw00d

    She is evil and should not be

  • Hw00d

    due to majority of Americans unpopularity with this evil, vile woman, she will not run in 2016...oh wait, I forgot this voting shiite is rigged and the political punks do what they want to now....carry on then

  • pearl87

    If Dean Garrison doesn't fault Sarvis for running, I do. He was a plant, pure and simple. He was funded by leftists with the intended result of putting a left wing Democrat in office and he cooperated fully with that effort. IMO he has ZERO credibility as a "libertarian". He is a fraud of the most devious and unprincipled kind.