Obama’s USDA to Hold EBT Transfers until Further Notice


When I first heard this story yesterday I wanted to get something out as quickly as possible and did not have time to write. Everything you have heard appears to be true. EBT benefits may be withheld in early November. At what point they might resume I do not know. But there is more to this story than a government shutdown or dirty politics.

obama_food_stampFirst let me give you a quote, video and copy of a letter from Mac's article so you can get up to speed, if you do not already know what is going on. Then we will start to fill in the gaps that we can. Mac Slavo reports:

…the USDA, which oversees the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP), has just issued an order to SNAP agency directors calling for their respective States to implement an emergency contingency program because of government funding issues. In a letter obtained by the Crossroads Urban Center food pantry, the USDA is directing state agencies to, "delay their November issuance files and delay transmission to State Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) vendors until further notice."

 

Here is the USDA letter in full:

ebt-funds-freeze
 

A lot of people are obviously in shock about this development and the natural reaction for a conservative might be to blame the Obama administration. Are they trying to make people hurt in order to villainize republicans over the government shutdown? Possibly, but there is more to it.

Here is what people need to understand. If you are on food stamps it is going to hurt whether this looming disaster is avoided or not. This did not pop up out of the blue. There was a planned cutback of SNAP benefits starting November 1, 2013 already in place. It was passed through congress in 2010 and was scheduled for this date.

Stacy Dean reported in December of 2012:

As policymakers deliberate over the "fiscal cliff" and calls are coming from some quarters for major cuts in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly called food stamps), they should take this into account:  SNAP benefits are already scheduled to fall next November 1, when the 2009 Recovery Act's temporary benefits boost ends.  Any further cuts would come on top of these significant reductions and would cause further hardship.

Benefits will decline for every SNAP household.  For families of three, the cut likely will be $25 to $30 a month — $300 to $360 a year.

That's a serious loss, especially in light of the very low size of basic SNAP benefits.  Without the Recovery Act's boost, SNAP benefits average only about $1.30 per person per meal.  Nutrition experts have long held that these levels are inadequate to meet families' basic food needs.

The Recovery Act boosted SNAP benefits beginning in April 2009, which helped to spur economic activity and assist low-income households during the Great Recession.  The Recovery Act called for benefits to remain at their new, higher level until the program's regular annual inflation adjustments overtook it.  In 2010, however, Congress passed legislation ending the increase abruptly on November 1, 2013.

The exact amount of the cut that households will face in November won't be clear until July, when the Agriculture Department (USDA) will calculate SNAP benefit levels for fiscal year 2014 based on June food costs.  But, the cut apparently will be roughly $8 to $10 per person per month, based on the Congressional Budget Office's current food-inflation forecast.

These cuts will likely cause hardship for some SNAP participants, who include 22 million children (10 million of whom live in "deep poverty," with family incomes below half of the poverty line) and 9 million people who are elderly or have a serious disability.

This announcement obviously coincides with an already planned cut. What I am telling you is that if you are on food stamp benefits then you are not going to like the end result even if you get your benefits in November. They were already scheduled to be reduced.

My hope is that this letter coincides with a recalculation of benefits and that it won't delay things for more than a week. I really do not know that it is directly tied to the current government shut down although I know that any opportunistic politician will tell you it is (while blaming the other party).

I think it is important that we do not jump to that conclusion but that recipients do expect that there will be a probable delay in their benefits. This would be typical of an inefficient government that always tends to wait until the last minute. If benefits are to be reduced on November 1st then this should have already been taken care of. It is my hope that this is the explanation.

With that said, the USDA letter does mention a concern over a "continued lapse in federal funding" which could point to something bigger. Will that be resolved when the shutdown ends? I do not know.

My suggestion is that people prepare for the worst and think about ways they can help out, or reach out, if benefits are delayed or cut off. I have some family members that receive EBT benefits and I have to be prepared to feed them if necessary. They may be forced to eat hot dogs and macaroni & cheese but I will help them all I can. Please keep this in mind. If you will not be effected then think of those who may be. If you will be effected then let loose of your pride and reach out. Family is family and we must do what we can to take care of our own.

Should you help someone who has been abusing the system for years? My opinion is that you should not. It may be time for some tough love. But we need to remember that not all EBT recipients are career welfare abusers.

Daisy Luther made this point yesterday:

We all know that the system is the victim of a lot of lazy people who have abused it for years, but not all EBT recipients fit that description. So please use some common sense and help out where you can.

Many of you have already seen the video and read the story about the 16 states that lost EBT benefits over the weekend. It was a temporary problem that was fixed, but…

This letter might very well tie into that. I see two distinct possibilities.

The first possibility is that states were reacting to the letter and that caused a problem with the benefits database. I am not sure how those databases are set up, but if states were trying to make adjustments then it could have caused a glitch. That is just a guess. You may or may not agree with it. It is my opinion that it's possible.

The other possibility is one that the social networks are already abuzz with. There is a growing consensus that the EBT stoppage was a test to see how people might react. If they know that there is a benefit delay or cut coming in November they might have wanted to "look into the future" so to speak and see how people may react.

God help us if that is the case. This video is a good example of how crazy people can get in a relatively short amount of time. This is a story marked with some panic and much abuse.

The above video signals that even a short delay could see some people losing their heads. My personal opinion is that most of the problems came from people who were trying to steal from the system, but there were no doubt a few people who panicked and made a mad dash to get food with honest intentions.

You need to understand that any kind of delay in benefits or stoppage of benefits could result in extra-long lines at grocers, riots, looting and stealing and it could affect any of us. Stock up if you are able and think about protecting your family if things actually begin to get out of control.

In summary I just want to say that I am hopeful that this is not as bad as it first seems. We haven't had time for the story to unravel yet. Only small media sources are reporting so far and we haven't had any statements to the public on behalf of the federal government. With that said I do not want anyone to wait around when they can do some common sense preparation soon. I want our readers to know that this could be on the way and I want them to prepare as best they can just in case this happens.

My gut feeling is that it will not be as bad as we think but that it will be a major challenge going forward. I don't think the sky is necessarily falling but I do think there will be delays and hungry people do some crazy things.

Please prepare yourself in a common sense way. No one needs to panic but stocking up on extra dry goods and bottled water would certainly be wise.

The worst case scenario is pretty bad and I don't think I need to go into detail because many are already thinking it. If this is financial based, and the food stamp program is in fact insolvent, then it could trigger lots of things including a national state of emergency and martial law. That possibility is there as well and we need to be prepared for it.

I will update you when I know something. Hang in there and talk about preparation with your family within the next few days. It's OK to wait a day or two because we may have a break in the story that tells us that it won't be as bad as it now looks.

But don't wait too long.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.






  • Felisha Trezevant

    people are always harsh when it comes to people who have to be on food stamps, but you never know when you'll need some assistance too. be careful how you judge people. the very place that they are right now, you could find yourself there one day. of course some people abuse the system, but there are some that really need it.

  • shaitn

    I just love the a$$hats who rant about people just going out and getting a job like it will happen with the snap of your fingers. NO IT WILL NOT! Unemployment in lower level jobs is higher than it has been in decades. No one wants you to know that, but it's true. For instance, in the county I live in, I found out about an opening at a business. I went in and they were out of applications. I asked how long they had been looking for help and was told "just over 2 hours." In that short time, nearly 450 applications had already been turned in. I have been in management in nearly every job I have ever had. That is part of my downfall now, as companies are wanting low level employees and feel that, with my experience, they cannot pay me what I am worth. In addition, the requirement to insure employees under the Obamacare law has caused thousands of employers to not only downsize, but to limit the existing or incoming employees to part-time status so as not to have to offer insurance. Now, when you throw in the fact that, if you are employed at all, in any capacity, you have to have health insurance under the new law, and you may as well not even have a job, because insurance is so expensive. In my state, several temp agencies shut their doors rather than contend with the new healthcare law, and the rest downsized tremendously. In addition, my state refuses to expand Medicaid/ Medicare to include people who don't already qualify for them, yet have no income to get insurance. So, don't you dare have the nerve to say anything about anyone. I can only hope you never have to face the issues that people like me have had to face, and continue to face every single day.

  • relswick

    Im not for sure why people always assume snap users are unemployed i work 45 hours a week managing escrow accounts for homeowners insurance claims an am a full time student with two daughters and i unfortunately have to accept some food assistance even with a non bottom level job food is so expensive now a days i could make over 40 k a year and still need some help as is i make a little over 30 k so i get a little tired of the assumptions. .. i dont like using the benefits but if it means my kids will get a good wholesome meal then ill do it and there is nothing wrong with that u put your kids before pride not mention the other part of welfare that supports tax cuts, kickbacks, and bail outs to the corporation costs way more then snap does look it up. After school or promotions when i make more ill be happy a portion of my taxes goes to help less fortunate

  • Ben tarpley

    As a former Secretary of Agriculture John Block said many years ago concerning food.
    Food is a weapon.
    Food has been used throughout history as a way to "control" people.
    Why wouldn't did outlaw government in Washington not choose to do the same to punish the masses for going against what the ruling class wants?

    Give it time as your Big Brother, the Nanny State and the Surveillance State moves onto the Police State.
    REX-84 and Martial Law await the country.

    America: Land of the so called free and home of the homeless