The UN Prepares to Expose the Global Warming Lie


As we see our President throw money at Green Energy companies like they were his college Coke Dealers, there is a major report getting ready to hit the United Nations. Apparently 36 of 38 computer generated models were wrong, and now the scientific community is forced to admit that the earth is warming at roughly half the rate they previously stated.

Think about all of the hundreds of billions, or possibly trillions of dollars that the world has spent to be more environmentally friendly in recent years. Don't take that the wrong way. We should respect the earth but think about all of the decisions that are made based on environmental issues. The Keystone Pipeline comes to mind. What about Obama's current war on coal producers?

article-2420783-1BD2956A000005DC-553_634x376

When decisions that hurt us economically (like "green" investments that have not paid off) are the result of lies spread by the scientific community then I have a real problem with it. Hopefully the forthcoming UN report will force many world leaders to admit that the science was wrong.

The Daily Mail reports:

A leaked copy of the world's most authoritative climate study reveals scientific forecasts of imminent doom were drastically wrong.

The Mail on Sunday has obtained the final draft of a report to be published later this month by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the ultimate watchdog whose massive, six-yearly 'assessments' are accepted by environmentalists, politicians and experts as the gospel of climate science.

They are cited worldwide to justify swingeing fossil fuel taxes and subsidies for 'renewable' energy.

Yet the leaked report makes the extraordinary concession that the world has been warming at only just over half the rate claimed by the IPCC in its last assessment, published in 2007.

Back then, it said that the planet was warming at a rate of 0.2C every decade – a figure it claimed was in line with the forecasts made by computer climate models.

But the new report says the true figure since 1951 has been only 0.12C per decade – a rate far below even the lowest computer prediction.

The 31-page 'summary for policymakers' is based on a more technical 2,000-page analysis which will be issued at the same time. It also surprisingly reveals: IPCC scientists accept their forecast computers may have exaggerated the effect of increased carbon emissions on world temperatures – and not taken enough notice of natural variability.

Even scientists make mistakes, but it will be interesting to see the reaction to these forthcoming reports. You will get a huge "tell" when you see the reaction or lack of reaction by the Obama Administration. My guess is that there will be no reaction at all in Washington. They will act as if these findings do not even exist.

Why? It's because environmental policies tend to have very little to do with the environment. These policies are often times excuses to push agendas. Isn't that right Mrs. Feinstein?

We shall see. My guess is that very few republicans even bother trying to push this. With some of the recent Town Hall meetings I wonder how many of them really even care about doing their jobs. Isn't that right Markwayne Mullin?

Either way, we shall see. This is probably viewed as the most credible source of environmental science that the world has, and my bet is that our elected servants don't even bother reading the report.

Read more at The Daily Mail.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.






Comments

comments

  • John Patriot

    It was really only a scheme to collect a carbon tax, knowing that mother nature is doing more than humans to either raise or lower the average temperature of the Earth and that nobody can control the weather or natural disasters. They might create a Sun Spot tax though, because people are so gullible they will accept it as a do-good save the universe plan. I personally think these mad scientists do more harm than good.

  • On the Mountain

    Not takers on that bet, sir.

  • J J

    First, Al Gore and all of his cronies should have to forfeit all of the monies they made from their 'global warming' scam!!! Will they now take up the 'global cooling' scam and try to accumulate more fortunes on that scam??

    How many jobs and industries have suffered because of their lies?? The environmentalists who took airplanes and cars to attend conventions about global warming showing their hypocrisy to the world need to take several steps back and reassess their positions and the damage they have done!!! Hypocrites!!!

  • http://www.honoratus.com/ Snod

    Anyone with half a clue understood long ago this man made global warming pseudo science was a scam. Just another failed Progressive power grab that I hope will come back to bite them hard. People should be going to jail over this fraud.

  • John Patriot

    The word (scientist) should be removed from all written languages.
    Scientists form their own opinion on a subject of their choice and then twist their research to agree with it. So, it's only math.
    Mathematics can easily be used to show that global warming is a hoax.
    How long ago did we start recording temperature statistics?
    How much did the temperature fluctuate up or down from then to now?
    How many oxygen breathing humans were on the planet then and how many now?
    How many square miles of oxygen producing trees and other vegetation were replaced with concrete and buildings?
    What proportion of humans or vegetation should be destroyed to strike a balance?

  • aposematic

    Note to future generations of crooks, thieves, and politicians: After the approaching ice age ends, the Earth will warm again...prepare your children's children now for the wealth they too will be able to steal. Evil on occasion sleeps but never dies.

  • Jack Parker

    I doubt it. The whole man-made global climate change idea is a complete scam for some lazy, lying, hypocritical con-men (e.g. "fat" AL Gore) to fleece the American public. Since various U.N. personnel can make big bucks off it, there is no way they will admit it's all a hoax.

  • Lynn Graham

    they killed the golden goose, after they drained it dry , of course......thanks al

  • greyhound44

    Where's Al Goof??

  • hommedespoir

    Be very afraid. Be afraid that what this article is all about. This is tPTB getting ready to admit that their chemtrailing is for real. Be prepared for them to say the real reason for global warming (is the still-top-secret military toxic chemtrailing that) has been poisoning us for decades.
    Then refuse to believe another word they tell us

  • Raymond Michael Borland

    I have been saying there were major problems with climate science and their use of computer models since the mid-1990s. I am not a climate scientists but an M.D.-Ph.D. who did animal and pharmaceutical research during my career. I got my M.D. degree from Harvard Medical School where I helped teach physiology to medical students while I was doing a post-doctoral research fellowship in the Laboratory of Human Reproduction and Reproductive Biology. The studies I performed developing new drugs that were tested in animals before my studies tested them in humans were mainly well controlled double blind studies. When I saw that computer models were being claimed as proof of manmade global warming it was like seeing a claim an antihypertensive drug works to treat high blood pressure in the absence of studies in patients who have the disease but based on surrogate endpoints and computer models that did not even include all the factors that affect climate. Climate also is affected by chaos theory (non-linear equations) which makes it almost impossible to exactly predict even the weather more than 3-4 days out, let alone a hundred years in the future. The computer models are only as good as their ability to predict past weather/climate changes exactly as they occurred and to prospectively accurately foretell the climate in the future. We have never gotten this from the climate scientists. Instead we have been inundated with one article after another that presents speculation that isolated events ( a warmer summer in one country, a severe hurricane in one year, violent crime in teenagers, etc) are caused by manmade global warming which has never even been shown in the past two decades of NASA satellite data collection on a global scale. They talked about GLOBAL warming when discussing a drought in the mid-west USA. What is GLOBAL about any of these things? When they looked at graphs that appear to show no statistically significant divergence, they data dredged until they created divergence . They deliberately ignored the warm period before the mini-Ice Age, for example. They used unvalidated surrogate endpoints as a measure of global temperature which was blatantly absurd, things like the size of tree rings from fossilized conifer trees from one part of the world. Since tree ring size is affected by things like rainfall, diseases, length of the summer growing season, and not just average temperatures , in that small part of the world, it was pure arrogance and stupidity to claim that these scientists had accurate surrogate data that represented the average world temperatures. They even averaged data from weather stations in Siberia after 1980 when the Soviet Union collapsed and funding for many weather stations in Siberian was cut off and the weather stations were closed and removed obviously from the average. They apparently did not correct the database for the removal of data from one of the coldest parts of the

    planet. Was it any wonder the average of the remaining data points was warmer when you take out the coldest points? Dr. Michael Mann's was such an erroneous statistical model that it predicted a hockey stick exponential increase in global atmospheric temperatures that never happened, yet the media continued to talk about climate change and warming! When random numbers were fed into Mann's model they even produced a hockey stick curve! Talk about garbage in-garbage out but because Mann was a propagandist for the man made global warming political agenda, a "consensus of world scientists" (pseudoscientists) accepted his unsubstantiated fabricated hockey stick curve.. The politicians and UN were chumping at the bit to pass a trillion dollar Cap and Trade Tax to redistribute the wealth from developed countries to lower developed countries. The big lie was created to push international Marxism-socialism.

  • USMC and America proud

    Sorry, but this post got it wrong! This post said "Apparently 36 of 38 computer generated models were wrong, and now the scientific community is forced to admit that the earth is warming at roughly half the rate they previously stated." That is absolutely wrong! The climate specialists are now touting that we will see "global COOLING" for the next 15-30 years, maybe sliding into a small ice age period before it starts warming again!

    Just exactly like I predicted 15 years ago! There in fact, has BEEN NO global warming for the last 15 years, and we have in fact cooled about a degree! So if they want to tout half the warming, they are STILL trying to shove the false god of global warming at us!

    • Sam

      What does this do for Al the bore GORE? How will he be able to milk more out of society? Guess he will start having to use his jet to push up the global warming as he jets around the world.

    • Karen Griffee

      Thank you

    • USMC and America proud

      You're welcome! I just like having the truth when repeating a post. Even these guys seem to not question the UN's lines! But when enough people start to tell them they're full of it, maybe even start boycotting the backers, this kind of what I call 'evil science from evil scientists' will go away!

  • Macjamm

    They will just say they where half right not half wrong.
    So now we have time to really fix things. (CARBON TAX)
    Well i think they where all wrong.
    And this is just a scam to tax ALL LIFE ON EARTH through Carbon Taxes.

  • fliteking

    The UN will never admit the truth.

    Here is a shot of reality.
    http://www.naturalnews.com/041981_global_warming_computer_models_cooling.html

  • Andrea

    Curious. I doubt very much that the UN will ever admit any mistake they make without having a larger plot brewing.

    However, global warming certainly is a lie. Pity, though, further exposure of that truth means one fewer false religion for people to cling to..earth worship is futile.

    • http://www.honoratus.com/ Snod

      Climate change however is very real. The earth's climate changes as a matter of function not because of man.

    • DanielAllison

      Yep. We call it seasons down here in Texas. They just keep on changing in spite of Obama.

  • David Risselada

    I would question the U.N.'s motives behind this. They are unlikely to all of a sudden admit they were wrong and begin back tacking on agenda 21 initiatives.

  • Ray - Jesus is the Son of God.

    MUSLIM INBREEDING: The horrific results you never see..
    We often see the mental deficiencies of rampant Muslim inbreeding (first cousin marriages) resulting in aberrant, abusive, deviant and shockingly inhumane behavior. What we rarely see are the physical effects.
    FYI: Up to 75% of all Muslim marriages involve first cousins.

    http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/08/16/muslim-inbreeding-the-horrific-results-you-never-see/

    • Bonney Bacon

      And this has what to do with global warming/cooling?