Obamacare Provision: “Forced” Home Inspections


"Clearly, any family may be visited by federally paid agents for almost any reason."

According to an Obamacare provision millions of Americans will be targeted.

The Health and Human Services' website states that your family will be targeted if you fall under the "high-risk" categories below:

  • Families where mom is not yet 21.
  • Families where someone is a tobacco user.
  • Families where children have low student achievement, developmental delays, or disabilities.
  • Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.

There is no reference to Medicaid being the determinant for a family to be "eligible."

In 2011, the HHS announced $224 million will be given to support evidence-based home visiting programs to "help parents and children." Individuals from the state will implement these leveraging strategies to "enhance program sustainability."

Constitutional attorney and author Kent Masterson Brown states,

"This is not a "voluntary" program. The eligible entity receiving the grant for performing the home visits is to identify the individuals to be visited and intervene so as to meet the improvement benchmarks. A homeschooling family, for instance, may be subject to "intervention" in "school readiness" and "social-emotional developmental indicators." A farm family may be subject to "intervention" in order to "prevent child injuries." The sky is the limit.

Although the Obama administration would claim the provision applies only to Medicaid families, the new statute, by its own definition, has no such limitation. Intervention may be with any family for any reason. It may also result in the child or children being required to go to certain schools or taking certain medications and vaccines and even having more limited – or no – interaction with parents. The federal government will now set the standards for raising children and will enforce them by home visits."

Part of the program will require massive data collecting of private information including all sources of income and the amount gathered from each source.

A manual called Child Neglect: A Guide for Prevention, Assessment, and Intervention includes firearms as potential safety hazard  and will require inspectors to verify safety compliance and record each inspection into a database.

Last session South Carolina Rep. Bill Chumley introduced a bill, H.3101 that would nullify certain provisions of Obamacare. The bill would give the state attorney general the authority to authorize law enforcement to arrest federal agents for trespassing. It would make forced home inspections under Obamacare illegal in South Carolina. It passed in the House but died in the senate.

Kent Brown and Rep. Rick Quinn discuss "forced" home inspections under Obamacare in the video below.

UPDATE: Politifact has said this article is a lie. Snopes has claimed it is false. Both are left leaning sites, of course, but we have refutation of their claims from Constitutional attorney Kent Brown. Click here to read the refutation.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook.

Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.






  • Auth

    If you ever show up at my house for any inspection, expect that all methods to repel invaders will be used including deadly force. I will die before I submit to tyranny.

    Sic semper evello mortem tyrannis.

  • dntmkmecomoverther

    If they want a bunch of dead 'agents' just begin carrying out these idiotic 'inspections'...This will not go over AT ALL, and will put every 'inspector's life in jeopardy. Perhaps this is what 'must happen' in order for us to get our country and our freedoms back...God help us.

  • mathewsjw

    the Cheka did same for Lenin, or what happens when the Socialists R in control

  • DrDanno

    Unbelievable how totally moronic, pathetically misinformed
    and sadly manipulated this report is. The frightening thing is that a-holes on
    your site are armed and threatening lethal retaliation towards those who show
    up to assist these families in need because they have more firepower than
    brains.

    This article refers to The Maternal, Infant, and Early
    Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Competitive Grant program described in the
    original bill as follows:

    “What is Home Visiting?

    Home visiting, under MIECHV, is a primary service delivery
    strategy (excluding programs with infrequent or supplemental home visiting). It
    is offered on a VOLUNTARY basis to pregnant women, expectant fathers, or
    parents and primary caregivers of children, birth to kindergarten entry. Home
    visits target one or more of the benchmark and participant outcomes in the ACA
    legislation, including:

    Improved in maternal, infant, and child health;

    prevention of child injuries, child abuse, or maltreatment,
    and reduction of emergency department visits;

    improvement in school readiness and child academic
    achievement;

    improvement in parenting skills;

    reduction in crime or domestic violence;

    improvements in family economic self-sufficiency; and

    improvements in the coordination and referrals for other community
    resources and supports.

    The MIECHV program is one of several service strategies
    embedded in a complete, high quality early childhood system that promotes
    maternal, infant, and early childhood health and development that relies on the
    best available research evidence to inform and guide practice.”

    http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ecd/programs/home-visiting

    It’s part of the Social Security Act

    (http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title05/0511.htm)

    • WhatWillYouDoWithoutFreedom

      The only thing moronic is that anyone would believe anything you say. Crawl back into that hole that you crawled out of and tell your daddy Obumer that they didn't by the BS.

  • Bighoss

    Read carefully the article on E-Cigarettes, above. The "shocking report" is actually an advertisement for electronic cigarettes, and if you should order them, you will find that you have committed to order--and pay for--more of them in the future. The text explaining this is craftily dimmed down at the bottom of the page where your order information is to be placed. This is an egregiously deceptive advertisement and should not be supported on this or any other web site!

    Sleazy bastards!

  • ibelieveinfreedom2

    That pesky Constitution must be destroyed, for in it contains an amendment that allows citizens to have 'arms'. Good grief! that nonsense must be stopped or the citizens may fight back! And there's that other one ummm let's see, I have it here somewhere.... ah! Here it is.. #4 bla bla, bla bla bla.. secure....home... warrants... seizures... Nope, that's got to go, we can't have some peon telling us we have to have some piece of paper.
    It's all good, it's covered under "Affordable 'Healthcare'". Our job is done! Those idiots didn't even read it and we got rid of that "Constitution" nonsense in one fell swoop! BWHHHHHHHH!

  • JC

    quid enim sanctius, quid omni religione munitius, quam domus unusquisque civium?

    "What more sacred, what more strongly guarded by every holy feeling, than a man's own home?" ~ Cicero

  • melloe

    Most of you probably, or the author, did not read the actual referenced document. I realize reading is tough, but you might want to try.

    • Bighoss

      Yes, and they are allowed to move their lips as they follow the text with their fingers.

  • $4752944

    “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
    ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

    • JC

      “When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” – Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776.

  • kobrien674

    Well, since I served my country for 20 years in the navy with many deployments, that means I'm to be targeted for anytime inspections as a "high risk". The decline and systematic dismantling of America and our values, and concepts of liberty and freedom, continues as the progressive's socialist, Nazi-esque police state rises. I fear we're getting closer and closer to a 2nd Amendment issue.

    • JC

      President teleprompter wants to see how we live does he?

  • W_R_Monger

    This is a backdoor policy to undermine the Second Amendment. The first home that has unsecured firearms will set the precedence. Then the first citizen to refuse entry with lethal consequences will open the doors, literally, for trampling the 4th Amendment. This entire "law" must be repealed not merely defunded.

    • JC

      Its a back door policy to undermine the entire Constitution and everything decent in human existence. And it has got to be stopped dead in its tracks.

  • GVJaneAz

    I cannot believe these people, but actually I do think it would be good to inspect some of these homes, actual finances, et al...when they live the life of upper middle class, all on every description of welfare possible.

    • JC

      Surely you're not suggesting that upwards of 46 million Americans and illegals are living a middle class life style on the backs of honest hard working Americans are you? ;-)